StringJunky

I'm like that with vodka, so Everclear would probably be worse.

This Havana syndrome anomaly has come up again in India. Any scientist here have any hunches what spectrum might be being used? Officer accompanying CIA chief develops ‘Havana’ symptoms -AP Could sub-sonic be beamed sufficiently narrowly to pick out a narrow area in the direction of someone?

Do you really need to know stress energy tensors before you can visualize curved spacetime properly?

This seems an interesting paper on consanguinuity and distribution: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419292/

If one becomes inexplicably depressed , with no known current cognitive/emotional issues, either internal or external, that, would imo, probably point to a persistent endogenous or organic cause. I'm a 40 year+ on/off chronic depressive, and can experience it spontaneously, even when my life seems to be going well and basically happy in myself. Being acutely depressed over one-off life issues, such as job loss and bereavement are responses to known events... and natural. The ability to distinguish between endogenous and reactive states is likely down to assessing behaviour patterns and life events timeline. There is everything in between, of course.

It's almost as if "It's not in the rules it's allowed". That's a path to more criminality and disorder. We generally act in the spirit of our laws, which are not necessarily specific, and the GOP seems to be mining into that type of subversive abuse of principles society stands on to operate with some degree of amicable consensus.

Just thought I'd add that I think current methods of the GOP regarding the OP are beyond the pale.

Ironically, Airbrush's flight of fancy will then appear to be true to a future observer with no prior knowledge of the earlier state.

I would have thought you'd enjoy knowledgeable feedback.

... for once! :p

Very good. Pat on the head, Sir! Your post heads in the direction of how my own sense of science has been emerging. It has been regularly reiterated by swansont over the years that physics is about behaviour, so we need to get rid of these 'thingies'.

My undersrtanding is that if a particle is subquantum, it's 'nothing' in the sense that it can't interact with quantm-level particles of the Standard Model. They are nothing because, ordinarily, their behaviour has no quantum level consequences.

Externet. You may find this BBC article of use - It's about somebody's Nigerian great grandfather who dealt in slaves with white slave traders: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-53444752 CharonY is correct in that this subject is massive and complicated... you can't tell the story with one sweep of a general brush covering 3+ centuries.

It was just a descriptive to differentiate from an explosion. In inflation, there is no central point of expansion.

Someone here may have an idea of the steps leading to the initiation of inflation.

The process is one of all-over inflation, not a leading-edge explosion.

WAG

I don't think freedom to harm others is in the Constitution, they should realize.

Some food for thought, maybe: https://www.thelightbulb.co.uk/resources/5-reasons-why-my-led-light-bulbs-arent-lasting/

Sorry, I read it the wrong way... the limitations of reading text.

It's easy and consequence-free to be an armchair military tactician with hindsight to work with.

Read some of the upgrade blurb and spam should go down.

What was that saying: 'Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence"

Lets just forgive them the most audacious attack in living memory, dig three thousand graves and forget about it. I think not. Nobody knows the consequences of their "solutions" until they are carried out.

As long as one is absoluteley sure it's not smouldering in any way. I wouldn't bring spent charcoal in, just to be safe; it can produce carbon monoxide if stll glowing unseen. You probably meant that anyway, but I'm just highlighting that point for those not familiar.