Bufofrog

I'm not sure what that graph is supposed to tell us, but it sure isn't a Minkowski diagram. The only way that graph makes sense is if t'= -t and x' = -x

I would do it the way the Clauser and Aspect's experiments did it. That is not true. The uncertainty principle say for certain pairs of measurements you cannot give an accurate measurement of BOTH of the attributes at the same time. You would need some sort of spaceship.

There is nothing wrong with having unsupported beliefs IMO, but they certainly are not science.

I seriously don't believe you. If this was a good faith question I would take the time to answer you but you are simply denying theories that you don't understand, so it would be a waste of my time. Just read and try to understand the article that you provided, the answer to your 'serious' question is in the article.

Mr. Srocket, if you would have read (and understood) the article you supplied you too would know that dark matter and dark energy are completely different things and not somehow 'intertwined'.

They have nothing to do with each other so they certainly aren't intertwined. I guess since they both have the word dark in the names you somehow through they were related to each other, which is kinda humorous.

Yes. Yes. No. Does that surprise you?

Humans are apes. If I understand your question correctly, the answer is mans ancestors like Australopithecus and Homo Erectus died out.

We are actually orbiting the galaxy's center of gravity. The SMBH near the center of the galaxy is exerting less gravitational pull on you than a car in your driveway.

Asking a chat bot a scientific question is a waste of time, it is just a chat bot. That is philosophy not science. What is length? I can measure or count using some arbitrary scale but fundamentally what is length?

This is not in the religion section so there is no need to bring it up religious concepts.

It's way better tool than illogic.

I didn't know there was a conundrum,

That is an insurmountable problem for your idea I'm afraid.

-1. You have been polite and respectful but you ignore members criticism and continue to double down on things like "photon wraps around itself" which is absurd.

Sorry, but this is just looks like unevidenced, illogical arm waving.

Yes.

Sure. Exactly, its belief without evidence. I do not have that type of faith. I don't trust knowledge that can't be verified.

Are you saying only empirical evidence should be accepted?

I don't know. I'm sure if God exists he could come up with something convincing. Notice that by pressing your finger tips to the keyboard letters you can look up the evidence for the BB and evolution.

That is kind of an absurd thing to say. If the evidence is not trustworthy it is by definition not evidence. Seems like you just want to argue for fun which I am not interested in.

You are quite simply wrong. There is lots of evidence for both of these theories, so faith is not necessary. The evidence is literally at your finger tips if you could be bothered to look. On the other hand there is no evidence of God and there is no evidence of the biblical creation, so it takes faith to believe in those.

Don't you realize that science fiction is imaginative movies and literature? The fiction part of science fiction should have been a big clue.

What a monumental was of time.

A new poll came out that said 7 out of 10 republicans are morons. Specifically, the poll said 67% of the republicans say Biden's election was not legitimate, which is the same thing as saying they are morons.