Bufofrog

First you should actually print on the pictures the figure number so it isn't so difficult to try to determine which figure you are talking about. Secondly I didn't see any algebra in your post to comment on.

As exchemist said it won't work so building it is a waste of time. The goesouts can't be more than the goesins, that is just a fact of life.

I think the answer is a resounding yes. Mammals have been around for 200 million years and birds have been around for 150 million years. Sounds like it's working out just fine.

Oh thank god, you had all our scientific dogma was circling the drain...

I have no idea what that means and I'm pretty sure I don't I want you to clarify it for me..

This is where learning about the actual evidence and not relying on your 'hunches' is a good idea.

This is just numerology. In other words this is just seeing patterns where none actually exists.

I also suggest that you should discuss this issue with a medical professional.

It seems like the whole disproving relativity thing is going to be a rather large obstacle.

I guess it's fun to fantasize that you have come up with some new physics.

I bet you a dollar this will not be "considered the new frontier in physics". Oh I see this is just an advertisement for your book. No thanks.

Regardless of the efficiency of the turbine, you will have a lot of loss of efficiency by running an entire hydraulic system. It is cheaper and more efficient to just use the engine power directly to turn the wheels.

Looks like the thing would work in principle. However it seems to me that it would be much less efficient than using the pistons to directly rotate a shaft.

No thank you.

Really?? I don't think so.

They are both correct.

I'm in on 'it'?? Oh I see, you are just spamming your conspiracy site to get some hits... No thanks.

Gee, that's a pretty low bar... but what the hell. +1.

That is a huge claim. Could you demonstrate how that works? If you can show how information can move faster than light then your method will get plenty of respect.

You owe me the price of a new irony meter, mine exploded after that.🤣 All of the parts after this:

I'm sorry but none of this post seems to make any sense. I'm curious about this though, what is your definition of 'pure velocity'?

Humans are so good at finding patterns that can find a pattern where none exists, which is why I think numerology like this seems so intriguing to some people. It takes a bit of critical thinking to realize that there is really nothing there.

Right. Physicist working with engineers and technicians can. If you mean it is a really big project to develop a nuclear program, I agree. Nope, the 'cat was out of the bag' in 1940, all it would take was money and a desire to make a bomb. Well apparently even countries like Pakistan and North Korea did. Yes, are you aware that most physicist were already aware a bomb could be made by 1940?

Of course not. The worlds physicist all knew of uranium fission and the idea of a self sustaining nuclear reaction by 1940 at least. The hardest part of making an atomic bomb is refining the uranium or plutonium.

Assuming you are serious, here is a link from NASA on how eclipses work. https://eclipse2017.nasa.gov/how-eclipses-work