Everything posted by Bufofrog
-
Guided evolution (split from Evolution not limited to life on earth?)
That is correct, there is no end goal.
-
Two plus Two Dimensional Spacetime (t,x) and (y,z)
That doesn't make any sense that I can see. This is just word salad.
-
Neutral simultaneity for two frames.
It seems that this is meaningless. So after writing the equation you now agree it is meaningless? This also seems like meaningless word salad. Velocity is constant and instant acceleration?!?
-
The Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles
Sorry, I clearly misunderstood what you were saying. I think you misspoke when you said this: I don't believe a particle can exist in the center of a black hole, but for sure a particle inside the event horizon will never leave the black hole
-
The Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles
Every electron has a black hole at it's center?
-
Relativity Crisis
Did you get your Physics PhD from a home schooling environment or something? There seems to be some rather glaring holes in your physics education...
-
The (Earth's) magnetic North_Pole attracts a magnet's south_pole
Happy Festivus!
-
The (Earth's) magnetic North_Pole attracts a magnet's south_pole
That (attraction) is correct (not wrong) glad (happy) that You (not me) have realized (discovered) this.
-
Can science prove God ?
Why not? I don't know what 'this' is but don't bring it up if you've been asked not to.
-
Can science prove God ?
Yes, a Geiger counter can be used to measure length. My car is 15 Geiger counters long would be an example.
-
Can science prove God ?
It is your opinion that is what the Bible says. There many Christians that think only humans have souls. I was just curious what your take was.
-
Can science prove God ?
Does that mean that bacteria have souls because they do not have hearts and they are alive.
-
The Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles
What is the photon orbiting? Why does the photon orbit? Are you saying photons don't follow a geodesic?
-
The Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles
Yikes!
-
Is entropy always low in a way?
I have a pet Chubachabas and he thinks reopening a closed thread is a bad idea.
-
The ebb and flow is the result of the rotation of the Earth and the gyres
Demonstrably false. Tides are due to the gravitational influence of the moon and the sun.
-
The Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles
You are required to present your idea here. The reader should not have to download a paper or a go to a site to get answer to their questions.
-
The Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles
Since a photon can only move at a speed of c, how can a particle that is stationary in my frame be made of photons?
-
Can science prove God ?
When I write God with a capital letter that is not an expression of any belief system it is just grammar. I find it very strange that you think I was being insincere. I don't think holding down the shift key when I type the letter g is particularly taxing, so it doesn't matter.
-
Can science prove God ?
No. Why are you asking such an absurd question? You asked what is the difference between soul and conscience, I was trying to indicate that if you look up the definition of those words you will understand the difference.
-
Can science prove God ?
Google the definition of soul and then google the definition of conscience. Compare and contrast the two definitions. That should answer your question.
-
Can science prove God ?
I'm not sure what sincerity has to do with it, but I was just answering your general question, not specifically about your feelings. That would be evidence of a conscience not a soul.
-
The mechanism of formation of rogue waves
This is demonstrably wrong, much like your other threads. I don't see how kinetic energy time kinetic energy can give a result in Henry's.
-
Can science prove God ?
I personally write God with a capital because ai think when having a discussion with a religious person it is antagonistic to write God without capitalizing. I just don't really have any faith in things without evidence, if accepting something without evidence brings you comfort then I think that's just fine.
-
Analyst theory Universal Tools
This can't be right because you are saying a speed is equal to a wavelength. The speed (m/s) cannot be equal to a wavelength (m).