Bufofrog

It doesn't seem difficult to me either, unfortunately the SC ruled in 2008 that the 2nd amendment says that gun ownership is the right of every citizen. So now I hope I never accidently cut off someone in traffic or heaven forbid that I get lost and have to turn around in someone's driveway.

Every time gun laws are struck down or not passed the law makers or judges throw up their hands and say there is nothing we can do because it would violate the 2nd amendment. Clearly the second amendment is in need of a rewrite. How many needless gun deaths are going to happen before we change the amendment, I shudder to think.

I think it is time to rewrite the 2A so that it is no longer a right to own guns.

The rest of the world thinks Americans are nuts, stuff like this makes think maybe they're right.

What was the math you were doing that resulted in "this 2 to 3 number"? If you write the equations out I'm sure someone here could help you.

It depends on how the code is written.

The only important information is what you are experiencing, just relate that to your doctor.

No.

Why would he fall faster than light?

At that point it would become part of evolution, but CRISPR itself is not part of evolution IMO.

I would say no. CRISPR has nothing to do with evolution.

I disagree. The points that can be explained should be.

It's hard to put a stop to an urban legend. For instance the majority of the republicans in the USA think the last presidential election was fraudulent. Never underestimate the stupidity of people.

No.

If only you were, then you could learn something. It's a real shame IMO. This is pointless. To your credit you have been able to annoy me.👍 I'm out, have a good one. 🤣 OK, now I'm out, glad I checked one last time. That's a hoot!

I would explain it to you but history has shown that you will ignore the answer or dismiss it, so why bother. I will ask you how do you think solar cells work. I also suggested you goggle "how does a photon transfer energy to an object". With any luck you will be able to find a description that is simple enough for you to understand. Good luck!

A photon that no longer exists cannot be measured. Is this not obvious to you?

Yes. No. Yes.

I guess you're done with the tides discussion?

No it's your bad faith arguing that leads me to that conclusion. Is that what you think is going on here, your genius is not being recognized?

That and other comments simply sounds like anti-science trolling.

Ha ha, it sure doesn't. Do you know what a bad faith argument is?

Using a polarizer. You can easily look it up, just google, "how to measure the spin of a photon". You seem to have this attitude that if you don't know something or if it doesn't make sense to you then it must be wrong.

I don't want to watch a Youtube. Since this is a discussion forum perhaps you could let us know what in the video you find interesting.

Because that is how graphs are made. The graph you supplied makes no sense at all.