Bufofrog

It seems to me that there is not enough energy from sunlight to sustain a large mobile creature. I base that on the fact that there has been life that is sustained by sunlight only for billions of years and yet there have never been (AFAIK) any photosynthesizing life larger than microscopic that was mobile.

Magnetic fields don't warp space. You can't move faster than light. No thanks, seems like not that great sci fi.

Anti-5G bracelets? Oh, for the love of...🙄

Yes you are correct heavy water has some slightly different properties than normal water due to the higher mass of the heavy water molecule. These are subtilties that I don't think the OP is asking about, he does not seem to understand that the chemical properties of the elements are to the most part due to the electrons configurations in the elemental atoms.

The OP was asking about elements.

That's probably true. In about a billion years from now the oceans will have boiled away and then life will end.

That is not correct. The physical properties an element are due to the number and configuration of the electrons, properties are not due to the number of neutrons.

So what is your point? It can't be this, "The Singularity is at the heart of every unit. That is why I say there is only one Truth", since that makes no sense,

Incorrect.

Still doesn't seem like physics to me. If there was infinite "positive energy" at the beginning of time then no matter how big the universe gets there will still be infinite "positive energy".

What's that supposed to mean? I don't recall where in the bible Jesus discussed physics.

If there are 2 observers in different reference frames they will measure the lengths as being different, so yes the same ruler (for instance) will have 2 different lengths, one for one reference frame and another for the other reference frame. I think that has been said multiple time in this thread. Are you going to just keep asking the same question?

Bringing up UFOs to bolster your ideas doesn't seem like a winning strategy.

It does answer that question, but I guess you didn't understand.

The simple reason you did not see the link is because I'm an idiot. Here is the link.

This a 10 minute video that will explain why light moves more slowly through a transparent material and upon exiting the material returns to c. If 10 minutes is too long, just watch the last 4 minutes.

There is no force needed. If I put a hot object in cold water, the heat will be transferred to the cold water without a force. The rapidly vibrating molecules of the object 'bump' into the slowly vibrating molecules of the water. This causes the slowly vibrating atoms to vibrate more rapidly and of course the hot molecules vibration will slow. This is how the energy is transferred and it will continue until there is no delta T between the hot object and the water.

I think what he is doing is because in the Torah the writing is in consonants only, so when he uses the English word God he only uses the consonants. Why he is doing that is beyond me.

I suppose you could use a gas generator. That would be a good Christmas present for someone with an electric car.

Reference 1 of the OP can't be found.

I haven't taken time to read much of what he wrote. He didn't take the time to discuss what he was doing, instead he just sited sources without explanation for his equations. If he can't take the time to explain what he is doing I am not going to take the time to go through his sources to see why he is doing. [shrug]

His calculations look within the rather large error bars for the estimates of the number of blackholes in a galaxy. Essentially you estimate the number of large stars (that collapse into blackholes) over the life of the galaxy and estimate the life of such stars and then you have the number of black holes in the galaxy. There are a lot of errors in the estimates as you can well imagine hence the large variation in the number of black holes estimated.

"Will my fly wheel battery/generator break the law of energy conservation?" No.

Thanks, that makes sense. Maybe the CO2 and heavier gases like H2SO4 are what is left of the atmosphere.

It is? I thought it was basically a big science fiction subject. I have heard the importance of a magnetic field to keep an atmosphere, but then I think of Venus which has an absurdly dense atmosphere and almost no magnetic field. So how important can it be. If this last part is considered a hijack please disregard, that was not my intention.