Politics
What's going on in the world and how it relates to science.
4364 topics in this forum
-
Donald Trump had four years to lead the United States and failed us by his own choosing. Whether it be in foreign policy or domestic policy, he did not protect the nation as commander in chief. Trump talks a lot but doesn’t say much other than to hurl insults and make false statements. Quality of life is not a business …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 483 views
- 1 follower
-
-
I want to hear others' opinions on under what circumstances should war occur, and how it should be waged. (I'm aware that there are existing bodies such as the Geneva convention which regulate the rules of war). I'm not of the opinion that war can never realistically occur, but obviously there should be restraints on it.
-
1
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 627 views
-
-
Intelligence suggests Russia is planning to invade Ukraine in January apparently with the intent to take it over. Likewise, China has been stepping up plans to seize Taiwan. Have been talking about it for years, but seem to sense more opportunity in todays global political climate. Should US respond if/when either of those two things happen? If so, how and for how long? Does your answer change if both events happen at the same time? Game it out…
-
3
Reputation Points
- 1.8k replies
- 201.8k views
- 6 followers
-
-
On social media, the word "feminism" gets thrown around a lot, often, to my knowledge, without subscribing to much of an academic definition. My perception is that it has almost become a "dirty word" on social media, and often just refers to anything a person happens to dislike (e.x. associating the term with misandry or dysfunctional "whiny" individuals rather than more historical or academic uses. As an example, if a person types "feminist" into Youtube search results, many of the search terms lead to videos of individuals behaving obnoxiously similar to what you would find if you searched for "Karen" videos or for other politically charged terms such as "SJWs"). S…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 986 views
- 1 follower
-
-
While I don't consider this a serious proposal, these are my thoughts on how totalitarianism could have beneficial social effects in the right situations. It's purely a devil's advocate argument. Everyone is treated as equal and human under the law, but obviously people aren't equal in terms of other qualities. As an example, the type of people who identify as "incels" are obviously defective in most if not all redeeming human traits. Whether this is a product of bad genetics, bad environment, bad character, or a combination of multiple factors, I'm not sure, and it is probably multifaceted. But, regardless, I don't see any redeeming value in allowing such indiv…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 20 replies
- 1.7k views
- 1 follower
-
-
My view is that most human issues (e.x. mental health support) are applicable to all humans, regardless of whether they are men or women. I see a tend of fragmenting issues into "men's and women's issues" (e.x. "men's mental health support or women's mental health support). While there might be specific issues, such as mental health issues, which are more prevalent specifically in men or in women, I think most would agree that promoting mental health in all people is a good thing, so I don't automatically the this fragmenting of issues along the lines of sex/gender necessary.
-
3
Reputation Points
- 84 replies
- 7.7k views
- 3 followers
-
-
With the Supreme court deciding that checks and balances don't work unless you can avoid checks and balances... Can Biden just... take care of TFG now? But you know... officially? A blacked out CIA hit with the presidential seal on the heavily redacted documents should count right? National security and whatnot. Also do we all know where this is going now? Once the lower courts rerule and defines the difference between an official and a private act, Trumps legal team is just gonna cry foul on that one too and demand the Supreme court delivers it's own definitions and rulings on that also, after it sits in the damn docket until it has at least an inch or so of dust on…
-
2
Reputation Points
- 31 replies
- 2.6k views
- 1 follower
-
-
The US does not allow Ukraine to attack Russian bases with long-range missiles (ATACMS). This war looks like if you play Starcraft with somebody, and say that you allow him to use only hydralisks against your tanks; if he uses mutalisks, you will break the computer. I suppose some people here have played Starcraft and understand my metaphor. I am afraid that Ukraine is losing the war because of such asymmetry. This is absolutely terrible, a victory of Putin will be a total catastrophe for the humanity like the victory of Hitler. I hope that the USA will nevertheless allow Ukraine to use ATACMS, despite the Putin’s nuclear threats. And this leads to a risk of a nuclea…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 630 views
- 2 followers
-
-
My view is that the term "conspiracy theory" is often misused to refer to theories which are considered "patently absurd". As an example, I've heard the "flat earth theory" referred to as a "conspiracy theory", even though it's technically not one, just a fringe theory. (Though some flat earth believers do believe that there is a conspiracy to manufacture false evidence of a round earth). A lot of conspiracy theories are absurd on the basis of common sense alone (e.x. the idea that alien lizardmen secretly rule the word), though others, even if false, are more plausible (e.x. that JFK's assassination was part of a political conspiracy), and some, like Watergate, have…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 16 replies
- 1.5k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Hello, I create music using AI, and I want to show my music video "The world of post-truth": youtube link deleted I hope my post does not violate the forum's rules.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 397 views
- 1 follower
-
-
My thought is that, hypothetically, if a form of government were able to meet people's needs and protect people's rights on par with or better than a democratic system of government, then the "structure" of government itself would be irrelevant. Democratic governments aren't an end in and of themselves, but a means for meeting such needs. In practice, though, certain types of governments (e.x. totalitarian states) have a well-recognized reputation of violating human rights - and it may be likely that even the worst dictators imagine themselves to be "benevolent dictators" in the likeness of Plato's Republic. In pure theory, though, what would a superior form of gover…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 16 replies
- 1.6k views
- 1 follower
-
-
My thoughts are as follows. Marriage generally consists of both a legal institution and a private ceremony. A private ceremony and whatever non-legally binding vows they take is purely in the domain of the individuals getting married, their loved ones, their church, and so forth. (e.x. Some churches would hold gay weddings even prior to same-sex marriage being officially recognized by their state). Marriage in the legal sense obviously can't and does not obligate people to live together, or even have a formal ceremony (e.x. in most states that I'm aware of, people who decide to live together as a couple can file for common law marriage if they meet the legal requirem…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 618 views
-
-
Doctors grapple with how to save women’s lives amid ‘confusion and angst’ over new Louisiana law A lifesaving drug used to stop postpartum hemorrhaging will be pulled off emergency response carts once it becomes a ‘controlled dangerous substance.’ When a woman starts bleeding out after labor, every second matters. But soon, under a new state law, Louisiana doctors might not be able to quickly access one of the most widely used life-saving medications for postpartum hemorrhage. The Louisiana Illuminator spoke with several doctors across the state that voiced extreme concern about how the rescheduling of misoprostol as a controlled dangerous substance …
-
1
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 616 views
-
-
I see "democracy" used as a rhetorical term quite a bit, so I'd like to attempt to better define it. In developed nations, such as the US and the UK, I'd define democracy as a representative system of government which allows democratic participation (e.x. voting for representatives and executives) which includes a Constitution that guarantees rights. It may also include institutions such as an electoral college in which popular vote isn't always the deciding factor in an election. I'd argue that this is different from "pure democracy" or "direct democracy", and that this is a good thing, since such things would effectively be mob rule and allow the presumed majority …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 905 views
- 1 follower
-
-
For the first time since the good old days, a far-right Nazi-affiliated party has won a state election. Both states are located in the East. The party is buoyed by anti-EU and foreigner sentiments (though, as per usual, in these areas the percentage of foreigners is very low). Also, they are pro-Russia, as it is often the case in European far-right parties. https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/01/europe/far-right-germany-regional-election-win-intl-latam/index.html Surveys suggest that especially young people are voting for the extremes and about half of the voters indicated that they did not vote for them out of protest but out of ideological agreement. Considering that …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 10 replies
- 918 views
-
-
Logical is that a travel with transport facilities which are moving with lower speed costs less than a travel with transport facilities which are moving with higher speed. Logical is for ordinary people to be transported with transport facilities which are moving with lower speed, because they are cheaper. It would be normal for ordinary people in the world to be transported by zeppelins or ships and not by airplanes.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 11 replies
- 1.9k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Using AI technology for the power of good, a former Google employee made all of the 900 some odd pages of Project 2025 searchable and filterable by topic area. Not all heroes wear capes. https://www.25and.me/?topics=
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 1.6k views
-
-
What is the difference of corporatocracy system than corporatism system? I thought Corporatocracy is an economic, political and judicial system controlled by business corporations and corporate interests. The concept has been used in explanations of bank bailouts, excessive pay for CEOs, and the exploitation of national treasuries, people, and natural resources and not say other tax cuts for the rich and allowing company mergers. Some people say the US is more corporatocracy system than corporatism. But I hear corporatism is the merger of large businesses and corporations and the government. That basically the businesses and corporations run the government.…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 1.8k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Some one said Trump wants to ban birth control, casual online dating, ban same sex and push christian views. Is this true or is it more fear base than reality? I thought Trump is back paddling on abortion now to get more votes?
-
1
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 669 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Shots have been fired at former president Trump while he was speaking onstage at a political rally in the town of Butler 35 miles north of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania within the last hour today. According to the rolling BBC News channel, a sniper with a rifle opened fire from the roof of a low building outside the perimeter of the rally. Witnesses say that a number of shots were fired, and that up to 4 people in the crowd behind the stage were hit. Trump himself was apparently grazed on the ear by a bullet and fell to the floor behind the rostrum before the stage was swarmed and surrounded by Secret Service agents. Blood could be seen on his right ear as he was bustled i…
-
2
Reputation Points
- 69 replies
- 5.6k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Hello. This problem maybe started sooner but at least since 2021 many Iranian users has been lost their accounts in many important websites. This can cause giant terroristic attack to USA and Europe because if one person be target or be victim for replacing his or her identify it is a way for a 9/11 but if many users it equal many 9/11. For example, imagine i can claim to some people i am owner of this website, imagine i can invite many scientists to a location and hostage them or kill them. My internet from 2022 has been a location for many Iranian governmental websites that does not work in logical methods like before. I had reported terrorists an…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 799 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Hello. I am from Iran. Internet of Iran have been bad since 2021. From 2021 Fons and criminals have gained power in Iran parallel to the government. Iran have been lost its polices. User of apps and websites do such actions that i think they have been replace with new persons. when use Telephones and cellphones for call police and security-services it answer by gangsters and felons. Nearly starting revolution of women life liberty , in west Tehran, in Ekbatan Horizon complex towers and around it, Islamic resistance ordered to gangster to kill best modern women and their families and give identify documents to Jihad Afghans and Pakistanis…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 829 views
-
-
1_If Iran be on hand of Islam because Islam is a anti-humanity anti-women violent culture and religion therefor it is not, good for all modern non-Muslim countries and cultures. 2_If Iran be on hand of hoodlums and gangsters of Mafia it will be worst than Islam. 3_ From 1401 Iran has been gone on hand of Mafia beside Islamic culture and now these two bad things are added together to make a worse whole. 1+2+3 => Please do Iran like Syria you will be able obtain all oil of Iran free and these people that like violence and they love MAFIA can live like 1400years ago. Men of Iran are anti-free-women and must be killed. Make your children and grand…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 919 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Ok, so with last night's debate over, and Joe Biden's cognitive impairment on full display for the world, finally a consensus amongst establishment Democrats is forming that he's got to step down to avoid a catastrophic defeat in November. So the question becomes, who should replace him? I think Gavin Newsom or Gretchen Whitmer would be likely candidates, although I'd personally prefer Bernie Sanders, but we all know the corrupt DNC won't let that happen. What do you think? Will the Dems mobilise to replace Biden or will they let him take us all down with him? If they do plan to replace him, who should be put forward?
-
3
Reputation Points
- 432 replies
- 37.6k views
- 2 followers
-
-
We dive into President John F. Kennedy's powerful inaugural address that challenges us to prioritize collective progress over personal gain. We explore the importance of civic duty and the impact of community service, highlighting inspiring stories from historical figures like Clara Barton to modern-day heroes. Join us in reflecting on how we can contribute to the greater good and build a stronger, united nation.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 8 replies
- 991 views
- 1 follower
-