Speculations

Space exists between locations. Nothing expands until a new location exists, expansion is the addition of possible locations.

The soul, ego, independent consciousness is a central tenet of most religions. However, Science cannot allow for the belief of an independent consciousness that survives death. If I am correct, the scientific method depends on the senses as the only source of reality. However, to maintain some sense of balance, I think that it is only fair to allow people who are believers in a soul to come up with an experiment. I can only come up with one, as follows, which is a safer alternative to killing the experimental subject: A person, or people, who claim that their consciousness can leave their bodies during sleep, an maintain some vision or hearing, are safely lock…

most people sometime wonder if what we as humans experience as life every day is real or not who said what we see as reality is not just a dream? are we really here or are we just more likely to be here than some where else any thoughts?

This Info come From a Hidden Remote Viewing of A Unknown Library Law1.you must use hidden hebrew orders..intact(A-J)..below Law2. in the examples below shows that number2 (Master)has power over number one(slave)..things that stays on top.. Example#1 1.swine flu -A 2.pandemic -B or 1.Snake -E 2.Moth balls -I Plus 1.Planets -C 2.Sun -F or 1.flood -G 2.Katrina -I 1.influenza -G 2.Eggs -I Here's some items.. I convert english into hidden hebrew orders.. Adolf's Anything Goes Chart Air -A fermium -A graphite -A krypton -A uranium -A antimony -B berkelium -B chromium -B dna -B dysprosium -B fire -B F…

I think we can express the four space/time dimensions as motion in four directions. 0 dimensions = point. It has no direction, so no dimension. 1 dimension = line. The distance required a moment to exist and it has length. The expanding line has movement in two directions. We can call these directions (dimensions) length and time. 2 dimension = triangle. The corners move outward in three directions (dimensions). Length, time and width. 3 dimension = tetrahedron. the four vertisies move in different directions to create the expanding tetrahedron. The directions (dimensions) are length, time, width and height. So movement in at least four directions is r…

I have question which could be difficult to answer I believe it is about consciousness This is it What if you were beamed (then two being exactly you) to two planets e.g. mars and Venus what planet would you see and why?

Is still the typology taken seriously?

The thread theory, I was surfing the net, and stumbled upon this. http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1106&st=0&sk=t&sd=a Proof of these ropes can be seen, here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:First_Gold_Beam-Beam_Collision_Events_at_RHIC_at_100_100_GeV_c_per_beam_recorded_by_STAR.jpg Those lines are, EM ropes!! Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedElectrons would be made of EM ropes, entangled like a ball of yarn. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedThis is not my Idea, nor my posts. I just agree with them. http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic…

The electronic structure went astray when everyone hopped on the Bohr bandwagon. Electrons are NOT likely to form spheres and xyz orbitals around a nucleus. Indeed, orthogonality is only applied within each level when it should be applied to all levels. Thus, the current model has lots of interpenetrating orbitals - why don't e's bump into one another? Why aren't the orbitals repulsing one another in the overlap regions? Scientists had a chance to select the correct "aerospace" model when they found it necessary to “hybridize” their orbital network to actually explain even simple molecules. They chose, however, to go their merry way and ignore the fact that their base mod…

I have been defining the primary origin in relation the founding structure of perception, as we witness an observer effect. We represent a singular origin with a blank page and the point thereon, and primary origin is merely a comparison between that which has no relative and that which is irrelevent. It could be either, there are no differentiating qualities, so by contrasting the possible undefinable states we represent singularity as a demonstration of opposites, is and isn't perhaps. I find accurate notions of an origin pertain to having 1 discernable element, we say location because two things can't occupy the same space. So the primary origin consists of…

For some years I have been advocating a classical explanation of particle and atomic structure. This has been rejected by those who believe that only Quantum Theory should be used for particle physics. This article shows how the table on: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=32854 (structural Fractions) combined with method used to create a table of elements on: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=38485 (table of elements) and the explanation of particle structure given on: http://69.5.17.59/clf8.pdf (CLF model) can be combined to explain the difference between atomic radii predicted by QT and classical atomic radii found by the inter…

Actually I was wondering if anyone could explain what this guy is talking about? He says matter is a wave in aether. http://glafreniere.com/matter.htm " The material Universe is solely made out of Aether "

Kyrisch I think you are on the right track - ALL things have a potential to be True, False or Neutral simultaneously. 2 + 2 = 4 But divide 4 by 3 and you get 1.3333333 remaining not 1 Divide 3 by 2 and you get renmaining 1.5 not 1 Note how the remainder of these numbers are > 1 Haven't got time to discuss now but 1 is never actually 1 exactly so 2 + 2 = NOT EXACTLY 4 (TRUE)

After reading a whole bunch of literature regarding extraterrestrial civilizations and the Fermi Paradox, it has me wondering about a lot of things. Well, the first reaction is, what the hell?! For one, it is reasonable to believe that there should be a huge number of advanced civilizations out there even if the Rare Earth hypothesis is true just simply because of the sheer size of the Universe. But on the other hand, we have not have any success in making contact, or even detecting a single one, and there is no reliable evidence that some form of extraterrestrial intelligence has ever visited Earth. It should be no surprise that SETI hasn't detected anythi…

Anyone know of any other theories besides evolution and creationism? Im looking for a theory that unifies creation of life and the laws of physics. I find it odd in the world of physics there is a very thin line for an experiment to work or the laws of physics to work, yet in evolution there is a lot of play i.e. mutation -> new being .

According to many theories (including string theory i believe) there is a type of multiverse which contains many many other universes. In my understanding, the laws of physics apply only inside a given universe. With that what can we say about the physics in the multiverse? might these multiverse physics allow for multiple multiverses? discuss.

I believe that they are fake and it is a bunch of bs. But I saw on the discovery channel a lot of ghosts story. Are these stories just made up for viewers? Well, there is a new movie the haunting is CT. http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.ap.org/horror-film-draws-unwanted-visitors-conn-house-ap Ed and Lorraine Warren, the researchers became famous for their discovery. People actually believe this?

I'm looking for an explanation of what four dimentional space-time means in terms of understanding the nature of time. Admittedly, I cannot really conceive of what a four dimenional structure would look like. I've heard all the analogies of imagining a two dimensional space with time as the third dimension, so I'm not looking for anything like that. Calling time a fourth dimension and weaving a "fabric" of space-time seems to give time some spatial qualities that I'm having trouble reconciling. If all points in a 1 dimensional line are present within a 2 dimensional plane, all ponts on a 2 dimensional plane are present within a 3 dimensional cube, all points in a 3 dime…

I'm not very knowledgable on neuroscience but from what I've gathered there are 4 main categories of brainwave frequencies which dominate the brain of the average man. 1.) Beta waves - Predominant when the mind is most active and busy. Good mindset for multitasking and quick thinking 2.) Alpha waves - Predominant when the person is calm and relaxed or in a meditative state. Good state for learning, reading, coming up with ideas and creative tasks such as painting 3.) Theta - Supposedly these brainwaves or dominant in the brain of someone who's dreaming or else on the verge of sleep. Also dominant in people under hypnotic trance 4.) Delta - Dominant in the brain of so…

there is this wide pervasive thinking that time, in and of its self , has some real physical essence to it inotherwords time has influence on the movement of objects is this true ?

Sorry, have an idea eating away at my head and have to post it. So if thermodynamics, or energy flows from states of high to low or what not, does this count down on the quantum scale? I know I have posted this question here before but I am still not in an academic position to work on such yet. So with that in hand bear with me. Ok, so energy or what not flows from high to low, and in-between for it to exist, or satisfy conservation laws, would that not in its own right give probability for some kind of order and time? This is where einselection and decoherence bugger me so much, more so in regards to chemical systems. For instance the earth is in a process of g…

relativity says that all objects consider themselves to be at rest and no experiment that they can perform can indicate otherwise. but if space and time are quantized then a moving particle should 'see' spacetime differently than a stationary one. imagine walking past a picket fence with evenly spaced pickets while a strobe flashes at exactly the same rate that the pickets are passing you. you would see the pickets as being stationary. now imagine that space and time are quantized into discrete units (arranged in a grid). if the minimum nonzero velocity (along one axis of the grid) for any object is one space quantum per one time quantum and all velocities are integ…

Thief here... Before this thread dies.... I saw the note early on in this thread. I was disappointed to see it was all but ignored. Time does not exist. It is not a force...such as gravity. It is a form of measurement....a cognitive construct....created in the mind of man...a cognitive tool...to serve man. Numbers go the same way. Numbers are cognitive tools...which we use to examine our 'realities'. Take away the numbers....take away the clocks....nothing stops.

http://www.steorn.com All seemed dead a year ago when everyone even people who previously supported them were saying they were a scam. But yet today with various activity including a new video on there site and yet another thing to sign up for, they still seem to be going. What makes it all so bizare is that various companies invested a lot of money in the idea and there is an air of seriousness about it all and was right from the start, talks at universities and the such. http://windsolair.blogspot.com/2009/04/steorn-at-standstill.html I can't see that Steorn could possibly get away with this being fake, investors would eventually take legal action and I can't …

I sometimes fell about the uncomfortable thought that since blood groups appeared, that statistics could show a link between blood and wealth or mentality. Suppose this were in some sense right, and that a couple forms, in which a partner had a "stronger" blood, that the other would be beaten, in some sense. Or that for example depending on the blood distribution in a family, the oedipus complex could be increased or decreased. Do you have any idea about this.