Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6789 topics in this forum
-
What do we think about them? Total BS or something else? Please post where your argument is coming from (Religon, Experience Ecs)
-
0
Reputation Points
- 11 replies
- 3k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Here you will find the story of the U.S. Air Force craft - a triangular shaped craft called the TR-3B. Questions to follow. I found this here: http://www.darkgovernment.com/tr3b.html But if you Google it, this same exact story is all over the internet: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=The+TR-3B+is+Code+named+Astra.+The+tactical+reconnaissance+TR-3B+ " The TR-3B is Code named Astra. The tactical reconnaissance TR-3B first operational flight was in the early 90s. The triangular shaped nuclear powered aerospace platform was developed under the Top Secret, Aurora Program with SDI and black budget monies. At least 3 of the billion dollar plus TR-3Bs were flying by 199…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 41 replies
- 26.9k views
-
-
Hi, I'm a real armchair scientist and my scientific knowledge is based largely on fervent web searches / books / TV shows rather than proper education, so forgive me if the following is completely absurd! I've been attempting to learn about subatomic particles, specifically how the Pauli Exclusion Principle affects them. From what I've read, fermions with the exact same attributes cannot occupy the same space at the same time. So, how does this work with black holes? Could it be that the gravitational forces are so great that time becomes infinite within the event horizon, thus allowing all particles to occupy a single subatomic 'space'? Or could the fermions …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 3.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Aliens headed for earth 2011/2012 What do ? http://beforeitsnews.com/story/175/068/Giant_Spaceships_Heading_Towards_Earth.html http://www.disclose.tv/forum/giant-spaceships-heading-towards-earth-t31730.html http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1190461/pg1 http://www.thegic.org/group/aliencontactandabductee/forum/topics/giant-spaceships-heading Go on http://www.sky-map.org/ and search these. Then zoom in, Each one is a different ship. 19 25 12, -89 46 03 16 19 35, -88 43 10 02 26 39, -89 43 13 08 50 47, -89 38 09 14 38 50, -88 40 42 14 59 06, -88 21 24 23 13 00, -88 53 11 Opinions? They cant be space rock. I Dont think theres s…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 17 replies
- 6.8k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Proof of God: Before beginning we must fully understand which methods and techniques can be defined as proof in the modern era, and what route we should take to verify the scientific or pseudo-scientific theories and hypothesises. There are three modes of observation: Mental; examination through the mind, Physical; examination through the body, and Empirical; examination through the self (both the mind and body). The physical mode of surveillance tends to be the most common, where things can only be proven through corporeal evidence – whereas the mental mode of study is infrequent and frowned upon, where things can only be proven through psychological means. The rares…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 1.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
This place is titled... "SCIENCE" Forums???? Really? This forum is a sad and shameful example of Ignorance On Display. Along with a Nazi syndrome power trip on censorship. This place is a JOKE. Your refusal to be told you’re WRONG is Pathetic. If you have serious doubts about electricity… go stick your finger in a light socket. WHY…WHY WHY…would anyone exclude something that RULES on planet earth. WHY…WHY… WHY…would anyone think that electricity doesn’t exist throughout the entire universe. Does Earth have some kind of special unique physics? NO. The Einstein crowd has that covered. I will leave you silly buffoons to your follies in virtua…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 14 replies
- 2.9k views
-
-
How does the Electric universe theory explain time dilation(an observed fact). Time dilation was predicted long before it was observed. In fact, it is so easy to derive that you can do it with minimal algebra skills. Now, let's see a derivation of time dilation using Electric Universe since Relativity is such nonsense. Relativity has an equation for it already, so when you derive your formula, the two can be compared. The comparison could even be tested. Go on and do a derivation for us, Just the Facts; it is the first step toward you being taken seriously. And please don't reply to this with a post that gives swansont BINGO.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.7k views
-
-
I believe I'm in the correct forum for this thread. It is Modern, Theoretical about the Physics of light. So... I believe light is a plasma phenomenon. The light travels through stimulated plasma and travels as far as the source will sustain. It is the overall strength from the source that determines how far… and how fast the light travels. There is no “Speed Limit” to light. It is a reaction process. Like a child on a swing. The harder you push, the faster they go. The brightness, distance and speed light travels is variable depending on this factor. The reaction is to the heat created by the source. The more heat, the more light it makes. It is only plasma afte…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 20 replies
- 4.2k views
-
-
I find that the quantum theory is wrong! I get a new formula to describe the spectrum of all element! my formula not only can describe all spectrum of all element, but also can describe their intensity, can I paste my formula and my calculation Here for release science news? please give me an instruction!
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.8k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I'm going to go the opposite direction of Stephen Hawking and bet that by the end of this year, we will have a generally accepted theory that unifies relativity and quantum mechanics. I will also predict that there will be an explosion of related scientific discoveries over this year and the next few. In previous great years in the history science, there have always been few people working on the cutting edge of science, relative to the number of scientists working today, and the world took a long time to catch up. Today, there are so many brilliant minds who have a hundred years' worth of understanding of modern physics, who are ready for the next level of puzzles th…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 2.1k views
- 2 followers
-
-
I'm not sure whether anybody watches the news regularly but I've noticed that the President of the United States of America always has the same hair-style whenever I turn the TV on. It's always short, he doesn't let his hair grow long and free. I bet he'd need to have frequent hair-cuts to keep his hair short all the time, but why does he do this exactly? Is it a medical condition? Or does he keep it short because he doesn't want to look more 'foreign' and cause him to potentially lose votes in the US? Does anyone actually have the answer to this question? If not, what does everyone think? What's with his short hair?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 1.4k views
-
-
Greetings! As a teenager I developed a treat, I did not have before. I clearly remember the difference between then and after. I know, you will not believe me, but I would still like to share my experience, if anyone would be interested in my words. I noticed my body has a system of muscles, that, how can I explain, make me change my mood. They run right underneath the skin forming a coordinate system formed from vertical and horizontal stripes. I can feel them. They help me concentrate even within my body. All people have this system, I am sure, yet I became aware of it. It is not a belief, it is awareness of it, spontanously born in me in my teens. Before, I was…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 1.5k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Good Day to all. Respectfully…. I don’t know anyone here at this site. Nothing personal is meant by these remarks. I try to remain friendly and respectful to all. I have been at too many various forums to be too concerned about what happens at anyone of them. I do like this site…. so far. I find it quite unfortunate that in some cases the Moderators at forums like this too often think of themselves as the Great Gate Keepers of science. They attempt to keep out any ideas that aren’t in Lock Step with their own beliefs, or of the so called majority. Instead of being “FREE THINKERS” they become more like Nazis trying to maintain the accepted status quo. They…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 10 replies
- 1.9k views
- 1 follower
-
-
The expansion of spacetime is commonly called "The Big Stretch" (Carroll & Ostlie. Intro. Mod. Astrophys.), and is often likened to the blowing up of a balloon. Musing naively from the analogy, balloons only blow up, when something provides an internal pressure, in excess of the surroundings. Speculation: The closed "3-Sphere" of spacetime is being "blown out like a balloon", by a radiation of "hyper-particles", emanating from "interior Hyperspace" (the hyper-space topogically inside of the hyper-sphere of spacetime). These "hyper-particles" impinge upon the "inside surface" of spacetime. As they "rain down" on spacetime, they produce a "pitter-pa…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 2.7k views
-
-
Allegation (?): Enzymes are "spring-loaded", storing Mechanical Potential Energy (MPE). When an enzyme binds with a reactant, the "spring-loaded catch-mechanism" is tripped, "trapping" the reactant into the enzyme's active binding site. This "clamping" process imparts the enzyme's stored MPE into the chemical bonds of the reactant, thereby supplying some significant fraction of the Activation Energy (AE) required to run the relevant chemical reaction (MPE --> AE). Then, the "clamped" reactants bind, into their new chemical combination, which has allot lower total energy. So much energy is released, in their (exergonic) reaction (RE), that the new chemical compound …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
I find that the General relativity is wrong! I get a new formula to describe the bend of light ray, the general relativity only can describe the bend of light at sun point, but can not describe the orbit of moving light when they through nearby sun! my formula can solve this problem! can I paste my formula here for release science news? please give me an instruction!
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 2k views
-
-
Dear admin : Thank you for your kindness! now I paste my calculation and formula, I want to know what time my post could return science news? please give me an instruction!
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
- 1 follower
-
-
If the scale of time and its relation to gravity was exaggerated to the point that one person could stand in a 20 foot hole and their time frame move twice as fast relative to someone standing at the edge of it....would we even notice? I don't understand how light relates with gravity to determine if we could *see* someone moving faster because their time frame is faster relative to our time frame. Since the speed of light is constant, it seems like we could definitely see each other moving faster or slower, in our different time frames, but is that true? I'm sure I'm not asking that right. But maybe someone knows what I mean?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 26 replies
- 4.4k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I have been following these forums for awhile and apologize if I hijack the thread. The current term for miniatoms aka hydrinos is hypoles. Apparently there is some work going on by Jacques Dufour, Sergio Focardi and Andrea Rossi that may be relevant. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338 Jaman aka Joseph
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 2k views
-
-
Firstly this in Speculations because that is what it is, speculation. While it is an outgrowth of my readings in Climate Science it is not directly involved in the current climate debate and doesn't effect the CO2/AGW argument. (Or at least it isn't intended to.) However I would like to put forward this idea for examination and criticism. I'm also curious if such "limits" occur in other sciences. Background. In this thread I likened the climate to the Drake Equation. I use this comparison to show the many different factors involved in working out the forcings that effect the global temperature. It demonstrates the many factors and could theoretically be used in cl…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 1.3k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I like the idea that the universe could be described as a four dimensional fractal equation. A fractal is similar at all magnifications, and at first glance it would appear that our universe is not. But what we describe as the universe probably does not encompass the entirety of existence. It could be that our universe is one of many, and that the reason we can't see it is that we are not able to look at things from far enough away. Or close enough. Quantum particles popping into existence briefly could be far more than they seem when considering the smaller scale of the equation. I realise that analogies between the orbits of subatomic particles and interstellar obje…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 2.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Atheists are now supporting Intelligent Design Yes you read the title correctly. You can be an atheist and be a supporter of intelligent design. Some atheists and agnostics can support and are supporting intelligent design. So what exactly do atheistic intelligent designers believe? Well most of them seem to believe the atheist intelligent design theories of John Gribbin “the multiverse theory” also known as the “designer multiverse theory”. Many scientists are currently supporting this theory including Martin Rees and Bernard Carr. I have posted many links on the multiverse theory at the end of this article if you want to research this theory deeper. On…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 190 replies
- 28.7k views
- 5 followers
-
-
I think I heard somewhere that Jews/Muslims aren't allowed to touch or eat pig because they think it's dirty. However, is pig really that much more dirty than say beef or chicken? Have any objective scientists out there determined whether there is a big difference in the amount of bacteria living in the meat of pig compared to other forms of meat? Is eating pig as opposed to other meats really such a huge threat to human health?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 9 replies
- 79.4k views
- 2 followers
-
-
science, wake up, you are in the Matrix. --------------Jin Guangnian I have proved a lot of accepted theories in Physics are wrong. Let me start with the mass of Earth. I found out human being still don't know the mass of Earth. M=gR^2/G , this formula shows how we calculate the mass of Earth. It's too simple. Human being just pretend we know the mass of Sun, Earth, Moon, Jupiter, Saturn and so on. In my research, I found out 3 mistakes in Mr Henry Cavendish torsion balance exp. 1 the distance between two balls is too close, the balls can't be treated as a point. 2 when we calculate the force between 2 balls on the ground, the law of univer…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 18 replies
- 3.3k views
- 2 followers
-
-
(1) Living quantum systems can cause & control Wave Function Collapses At deepest root, all physical systems are quantum systems. And, living cells are "self-measuring" quantum systems -- "at its most fundamental level, the living cell is a quantum system, which measures its own internal state" (McFadden. Quantum Evolution, p.164). Thus, quantum systems that are "alive" can cause, or "self-trigger", their own Wave Function Collapse events (quantum evolution by von Neumann Type I process). Moreover, modern human science has hinted that quantum Wave Function Collapse, normally an unbiased random process, can be biased, so that quantum possibilities, latent in…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 1.9k views
- 1 follower
-