Hrvoje1 Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 (edited) I woke up one morning, and realized that I don't have an answer to questions such as how life started on earth, and how it evolves. I had nothing better to do, so I started to investigate it a bit, wrote 4 short essays, and published it on a blogger platform. Here they are: https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-origin-of-information.html https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-revision-of-origin-of-information.html https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-connection-between-thermal-food.html https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-game.html They also present my naturalistic philosofical views. If you feel like it, give me some feedback, positive or negative, I don't care. Or, better to say, I can stand it. If I really didn't care at all, I wouldn't bother to write. Edited December 9, 2018 by Hrvoje1 misspeling in title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, Hrvoje1 said: I woke up one morning, and realized that I don't have an answer to questions such as how life started on earth, and how it evolves. Science has answers to how it evolves and is a long way to understanding how it started as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrvoje1 Posted December 9, 2018 Author Share Posted December 9, 2018 So, if science has answers, it's not anymore philosophical subject, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 Just now, Hrvoje1 said: So, if science has answers, it's not anymore philosophical subject, right? you can still ask why... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrvoje1 Posted December 9, 2018 Author Share Posted December 9, 2018 (edited) Look, if philosophy was good for Newton, it should be good for us too. He didn't bother to make sharp distinction between philosophy and science, so why should we? Edited December 9, 2018 by Hrvoje1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 28 minutes ago, Hrvoje1 said: Look, if philosophy was good for Newton, it should be good for us too. He didn't bother to make sharp distinction between philosophy and science, so why should we? They are distinct subjects now, whereas in Newton's time philosophy had a much greater say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 57 minutes ago, Hrvoje1 said: So, if science has answers, it's not anymore philosophical subject, right? Well, if science has answers it just seems a bit pointless making up your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 49 minutes ago, Hrvoje1 said: Look, if philosophy was good for Newton... Because we have moved on in the last 350 years. 1 hour ago, Hrvoje1 said: They also present my naturalistic philosofical views. If you feel like it, give me some feedback Learn to spell philosophical (or get a browser that corrects it for you). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrvoje1 Posted December 9, 2018 Author Share Posted December 9, 2018 7 minutes ago, Strange said: Well, if science has answers it just seems a bit pointless making up your own. Maybe it has some answers, but not all? Maybe not all scientists agree all the time on all points? Maybe you still have to figure out what scientists know, and you think you know too, but it's far from the truth? 3 minutes ago, John Cuthber said: Learn to spell philosophical (or get a browser that corrects it for you). Buzz off. Did I spell that right for you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 9 minutes ago, Hrvoje1 said: Buzz off. Unlike you, I didn't ask for feedback... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Hrvoje1 said: Maybe it has some answers, but not all? Maybe not all scientists agree all the time on all points? Maybe you still have to figure out what scientists know, and you think you know too, but it's far from the truth? not this again; are you bothering god again? Edited December 9, 2018 by dimreepr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrvoje1 Posted December 9, 2018 Author Share Posted December 9, 2018 No, what I meant is that someone may think he/she knows all the stuff that scientists know, but he/she doesn't. I know I didn't. So I investigated it a bit, and came up with these essays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiot Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 2 hours ago, Hrvoje1 said: I woke up one morning, and realized that I don't have an answer to questions such as how life started on earth, and how it evolves. I had nothing better to do, so I started to investigate it a bit, wrote 4 short essays, and published it on a blogger platform. Here they are: https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-origin-of-information.html https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-revision-of-origin-of-information.html https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-connection-between-thermal-food.html https://hrvojedj.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-game.html They also present my naturalistic philosofical views. If you feel like it, give me some feedback, positive or negative, I don't care. Or, better to say, I can stand it. If I really didn't care at all, I wouldn't bother to write. Whilst I appreciate that in all sincerity you have created a fair amount of work, I don't know why the mods are allowing this thread to proceed in this format since we have to go offsite to read anything. Anyhow I note that two at least of your blogs are about 'information' But I could not find anywhere where you told us what you mean by information. Quote For example, I wasn't aware of the fact that "information" is uncountable noun in English, unlike in Croatian, in which the word "informacija" has singular and plural form, since it means a piece of information, or a bit of information. Nor do I knwo what an uncountable noun is in English so please enlighten me about that. Do you mean 'collective noun' ? https://www.google.co.uk/search?source=hp&ei=qSYNXK-BLY3hkgW7_KGQCw&q=collective+noun&btnK=Google+Search&oq=collective+noun&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.912.3032..4494...0.0..0.1150.5450.5-1j3j2......0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131.GgD8PsRkloM In any case English and Science differ in their definition and use of the word. So any serious work using that word must provide a definition early on to define the scope of the discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrvoje1 Posted December 9, 2018 Author Share Posted December 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, studiot said: Nor do I knwo what an uncountable noun is in English so please enlighten me about that. Here you are: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/grammar/countable-nouns This is oxforddictionaries, is that authentic enough for you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 27 minutes ago, Hrvoje1 said: No, what I meant is that someone may think he/she knows all the stuff that scientists know, but he/she doesn't. I know I didn't. So I investigated it a bit, and came up with these essays. 1 And you do now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrvoje1 Posted December 9, 2018 Author Share Posted December 9, 2018 And why would mods not allow the discussion? Some of them already told me to go elsewhere to blog. So I did it. But it doesn't mean I cannot discuss it here. As for the definition of information, there are some here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information There are also theories about that subject, and I referred to them in these essays. Just now, dimreepr said: And you do now? Well, I know more than I knew before I did the investigation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 ! Moderator Note Rule 2.7 (emphasis added) Advertising and spam is prohibited. We don't mind if you put a link to your noncommercial site (e.g. a blog) in your signature and/or profile, but don't go around making threads to advertise it. Links, pictures and videos in posts should be relevant to the discussion, and members should be able to participate in the discussion without clicking any links or watching any videos. Videos and pictures should be accompanied by enough text to set the tone for the discussion, and should not be posted alone. Users advertising commercial sites will be banned. IOW, if you want to talk about something, post it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts