Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Endy0816

  1. Just to note, most posters here dislike video "proofs". Serious time sucks.



    There is ambient electricity. The problem is tapping it in an efficient manner.


    Mainly thinking Telluric currents, Earth's magnetic field and your neighborhood leakage. Mostly low energy sources or come with high inefficiencies.


    The easiest issue to pinpoint in SEG is that the permanent magnets would lose energy. You certainly could get something to spin for awhile running off them, but it wouldn't go on forever.


    For that matter if you did have a free energy source that for whatever reason required magnets, electromagnets would be more reasonable to work with instead.




    ...and there are some impossible things. You cannot breath in a vacuum no matter how much you believe.


    Your thoughts can impact reality and your perception of that reality, but reality still has the final say.

  2. Really nobody knows for sure, so you are free to believe whatever you want on this one.



    My own thought is that a singularity wouldn't be a singularity anymore in an environment without space itself existing.


    MU/0 => MU


    Cyclic universe theory with an entropy reset going on in between.



    Best fit in terms of observable phenomenon. There are plenty of other theories out there though. God, vacuum fluctuation, colliding branes, you name it.

  3. Once more unto the breach...



    In physics, Planck units are physical units of measurement defined exclusively in terms of five universal physical constants listed below, in such a manner that these five physical constants take on the numerical value of 1 when expressed in terms of these units.


    the gravitational constant, G,

    the reduced Planck constant, ħ,

    the speed of light in a vacuum, c,

    the Coulomb constant, (4πε0)−1 (sometimes ke or k), and

    the Boltzmann constant, kB (sometimes k).



    So from this we see that these units were made up wholesale for a specific reason.



    1Q = e72b7e167f60ba883f3dcf1d84bbe605.png


    If Planck Charge(Q) did not have this property it would not be Planck Charge. It must equal 1.875 x 10-18 coulombs or it would not be Planck Charge. Electric charge does not equal this, thus, it is not Planck Charge.


    This allows us to say something like 5Q instead of 5 times that entire mess up there. It is purely for convenience. In no way does it somehow dethrone Electric charge.



    This came off stronger than I typically care to write, but I really see no other way of getting through. Please for your own sake take it to heart and consider your stance.

  4. They can obtain location data legally from public information your phone broadcasts, legally from the provider and less than legally through hacking. Might as well give up the ghost on that one.


    I was just thinking an anonymous database for everyone located within some radius of a crime. When something occurs an automated non-binding request for assistance goes out. Something reasonable that balances both privacy and security.

  5. We commonly don't do this in the US for many of the same reasons listed. Considering the religious and human rights issues I strongly doubt there will be any national implementation. I find it more than a little concerning that other countries think we're happy to microchip ourselves.


    IMO more useful would be tracking all the phone GPS data. Would help to rapidly narrow down potential suspect/witness pools.

  6. First Inow, I do not like tools. Especially ones who are programmed! Shows exactly how really high someones I.Q really is!


    Lets first look up deficit. Here is the definition just for you. Deficit: The amount by which a sum of money falls short of the required or expected amount; a shortage.


    The difference between the shortfall and the actual amount is turned to debt. As our government does one of two things to counter it. 1. Has the fed create more money to pay the debt with interest! Or 2. sells bonds to another party with interest. Both incur more debt. Which is cyclic and brings about a bigger deficit. Then is repeated.


    If you cannot understand this concept, then perhaps you should study Keynesian economics. But to help you out, make sure you read this link:http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That is actual debt!


    As to your opinion, it is just that, believe it or not! In either case you get the real repercussion's very soon. Why I dont follow blind men! They tend to have serious shortcomings!



    Federal Deficit: An excess of the federal government's spending over its revenue


    A deficit may lead to debt, but they really are two different things.


    You reduce a deficit through balancing revenue and spending. You reduce a debt by making payments.


    The payments could come straight from tax dollars or you can increase the total amount of money in circulation. Either option is equally valid if not equally wise.

  7. Qpl^2 / ( 4*pi*ε R) != h–bar* C / R (3)


    This is true. If two things were not equal in the first place they won't be equal in the end.



    You doing the equivalent of saying: 1 = 2.


    I don't know any other way to put this. Whatever you think, the two terms are referring to different values. They are not the same. You cannot set them equal.

  8. Isn't cancer just mutated cells?


    Wouldn't a strong immune system with a lot of immune system cells, the mobile cells, be able to invoke apoptosis on the mutated cells?


    Just seems pretty deluded to think that the human body cant defend itself as a whole when it receives the proper nutrition.



    The pathway for apoptosis itself can suffer from mutations.


    There might actually be nutrition based preventative measures. Neither of the two sugars I know of are in anyone's normal diet though.

  9. You've posted on this going back to at least 2008, across assorted forums and discussion boards...


    Yes, as far as it goes, Gravity is a force.


    You would be best off looking at the principles of orbital mechanics, aerodynamics and atmospheric phenomenon. Based on historical evidence I doubt this will occur, but one can hope.

  10. I would think that introduced undesirable traits would be selected against pretty quickly once they were discovered. Introducing a ditch weed version would probably be a good idea though.


    There are a number of modified cannabis and opium plants already out there. Most work to improve the potency though.

  11. bla bla bla




    Would you not find this insulting if someone did this to you?


    Don't insult and don't demonstrate willful ignorance. Not hugely complicated. Some of your posts are perfectly fine, others demonstrate inappropriate behavior and were rewarded appropriately.


    You want to smack someone down, smack them down with statements of facts and numbers. You attack the person and you have already admitted that your own argument was insufficient.

  12. I had some thought that a black hole might instead represent a tunnel going forward through space-time as far as the external Universe is concerned.


    The "why" might just be the result of a force that has no counter force. I remember looking at Coulomb's law and seeing a similar breakdown state that isn't observed in reality. I don't think anyone can offer a definitive answer though.


    So your stance is that the whole world with all it's wildlife are only here for our enjoyment. It any animal does not bring us enjoyment or food it has no purpose?



    No, my stance is that other species are here for their own sake. We should keep them around to help ensure our own survival.


    More than reasonable considering it includes every genome on the planet.

  14. I base my actions on how much of the modern support system I have access to. Don't kill unnecessarily, but be willing to kill if your own survival depends on it.



    Broadly speaking we need other life to provide us with novel genetic variations. No easy way to simulate it all, nor see the compound interactions that occur as a result.


    Other life can act as a disease vector, but our own farm animals are some of the worst threats. We could eliminate that risk at present and will, literally, have more palatable options in the future. I don't see that as a viable reason.

  15. Sounds like a vanity press issue. Universities will probably start asking for quality assurance reviews of the journals. You'll have to be published within that subset for your paper to be recognized.

  16. He's gone, but yeah, we've never seen any particular proof for one.


    Universe likely came from something resembling a black hole. Not sure the definition fits with the state space itself was in at that point, but only word we have that fits.


    I would think there would be re-collapse issues if some part of it continued to exist after the initiation of the Universe. Besides that there would be the question as to why some matter "exited" and other matter did not. I don't see any particular reason it would play favorites.


    I'm of the opinion the Universe might just cycle through different initial conditions. Not sure how or if ever we'll be able to prove or disprove such conjecture though.

  17. The "E's" don't represent the same thing. All energy, but different forms in different situations.


    As a quick example:




    [latex]\tau = 2\pi [/latex]


    Tau [latex]\tau[/latex] is referring to two different things, torsion and Pi doubled.


    I can write:


    [latex]-n\cdot b' = 2\pi [/latex]


    but it won't make much sense.


    Hopefully this helps.

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.