Moontanman

DST, in the winter, causes students to have to wait in the dark for the school bus in the mornings.

Good question, I have no idea, I was not asserting that we need to be looking into it but knowing the curiosity of humans I would be surprised if no one has looked into it.

The difference between how and why is how our technological civilization was formed, how is always important, why is often nothing but a subjective desire.

The question was how not why.

I know I am ignorant on this topic but I would be surprised to find out, that if no one knows how a charge creates an electrical field, that no one is looking into the problem.

I read it as the energy of expansion cooled into matter or at least that is how it was worded when I read it in several articles many years ago. The wording "expansion of energy" was "energy of expansion" is this significant?

Evidently the difference is that the starch is considered a more pure form of the root and the flour includes fiber, protein, and other impurities. IMHO it appears that the starch is what's left over after all the nutrients are removed but that is just me. Evidently there is a poison that needs to be removed as well but I have no knowledge of this. @Externet Were you aware of the poisonious nature of this flour or is this article mistaken? https://www.starchprojectsolution.com/faq/cassava_starch_flour_1137.html

The Blair Mitch project!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudaelurus or if you prefer a video description https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNrt90MJL08 Cats started out from a small animal that resembled this

Sadly I have to agree with you on this and the victims of this disease are anti vaccers!

Thankyou, I had first learned of this "interpretation" several months ago and the way it was worded and my own ignorance of the subject made it sound interesting. I had assumed it to be mainstream science, I wish such information was graded a bit when it is consumed by interested laymen like me.

I tried to find a source that didn't include a video but this is the best I could do on short notice. I'll try to find more suitable sources but the OP has not explained his own idea yet so I'll wait and see, it's possible this is his idea. https://www.technology.org/2021/02/28/does-time-cause-gravity/ https://mediaplayer.whro.org/program/pbs-space-time/e/does-time-cause-gravity-5hns3m

Isn't it the current consensus that the flow of time and mass causes gravity?

Talk about dad jokes!

Now that is witty!

Put that hotdog in my bun!

Could have been a movie, Lady Chatterley's Mickey Mouse Lover?

Just one more reason to assert that religion is the great filter! Is this the same voices that said that reversal of roe vs wade wouldn't keep women from having an abortion if their lives were in danger?

I disagree, truth is that which comports with reality, truth by definition has to be objective. 50 billion flies refers to the old saw about "Eat shit, 50 billion flies can't be wrong"

If you want to convince anyone of the existence of your god I would suggest you start by not using the ignorant lying sack of steaming monkey shit called Dr. Zakir Naik as a source. The number of people who are converting to islam or the number of people who believe islam is meaningless. You need to provide empirical evidence for the existence of a god then we can discuss whether or not your god exists until actual testable evidence is given all you are doing is preaching and that is not allowed here.

Yes.