dimreepr

Depends on the quality of the teacher, ChatGPT's children might actually learn from human history...

How can you stop every Tom, Dick and Harriet from using what they think, is a useful tool (for a blacksmith)? Everyday we hear report's of AI growing crops more efficiently and curing cancer etc. and the media sc/treaming how this is the universal remote control to any chanel we want. This topic is still very much in the 'human' political arena.

I don't think AGI is inevitable, but if it is, I think it's way off. What would be the point of trying to develope it, if we can build every individual AI in a different aspect of humanity? Besides I think humanity will learn to adapt to that reality, well most of us, but some of us will always ask question's of the reality that's before us and maybe inspire a reality adjustment.

Not everyone thinks it's wrong... The comfortable among us think we're in something approaching the sunlight upland's, whilst trudging through the swamp of despair; the light at the end of the tunnel might be an approaching train...

Indeed, no one is immune to the human condition, we make emotional decisions and then try to legitimise it with rational reasoning, it doesn't really matter where we get our validation, as long as we respect the author; Deep Blue, Watson et al, beat the best humans, what better validation? For those who don't really understand why the et al don't represent intelligence...

So then we become the savages?

The problem is people just want their somer and will, "March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream" - Pink Floyd - Sheep lyrics,to get some more. Edit, darn it, now I've got to go utube and listen the the album. The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it. -Omar Khayyam, translated by by Edward FitzGerald The fuse is lit, lets hope the government invested in sand bags.

Tim Harford has a BBC radio series called 'cautionary tales' in which even the smartest of us, are susceptible to make stupid decisions.

Probably. Indeed, but isn't that wally some kind of reality?

I was thinking in terms of the universe and the space it takes up, I think, as in an infinite boundary does not = infite monkey's. My apologies for not understanding the math to explain myself more correctly or fully understand your point, but thanks for your patience.

I'm thinking the infinite monkey hypothesis is wrong bc infinity has limits, there can't be an infinite number of monkeys, as we know them.

Not now perhaps, but it has the potential too; as it can be argued, is true throughout our technological evolution. The only real answer is, when or does society feel like a dystopia. Let's not forget an AI will learn from this topic... 😉

Carefully, I hope... 🙂

I can only assume that you think neurons in other parts of the body, is a brain in and of itself, maybe it's more complicated than that... Why would they... My experience of the magic shroom, led to signals I couldn't quite see... 😉

Aren't we just circling back to the nature of a paradox, namely it's existence?

Just remember that you're asking an infant ATM, and while I agree that the computer will never understand the question you're asking and will probably always have blind spots, due to the "lost in translation" effect. Assuming Moore's law is also applicable to AI, then how long do we have before experts/professors are disagreeing about the correctness of the answer?

I'm here to learn, how does this differ from the infinite monkey's hypothesis?

But an actual representation of randomness is rejected bc of our expectations.

Isn't Murphy's law sufficient?

No they don't, every revolution, begins by trying to guard against the inequities of the previous regime, both left and right extremes; then they get on with living their lives. Time and money/power then gets to work and a few hundred years later, the guards have been subverted or submerged and the orginal intent is pushing up the daisies. " the new power becomes even worse than the previous one." That depends on which end of the cutlery your looking at food... 😉

I know they're humans, are you suggesting that they're magic humans?

Nope, it's the political equivalent of a pendulum (metaphor) and like a pendulum it has to complete it's swing, that doesn't equal worse; it's an equal and opposite reaction, not too mention that there's many examples, throughout history, of the pendulums swing being significantly retarded and actually leading to a better world... 😉

The roman empire was once bought in a public auction... What I meant was, a diminished empire will still have influence beyond it's death, just look at Hollywood (not bc of jews)...

The last great empire was reduced to the Vatican, just a thought...

This visit from the King seems to show a greater sense of deference, in the upper echelons of American politics, than it is here in blighty; or is that a bit of BBC bias? I wonder how deep in the American societal psyche it goes?