dimreepr

Maybe you should read about Maimonides before we explore 'the enlightenment'.

It will be what it is... 😉

Yet, strangely, all of my free range duck's, voluntarily, line up at dusk to be re-imprisoned; maybe they feel safer... 😉

If I understood what? You haven't explianed anything, so far. And how does two word's, that you seem unable to comprehend properly, expose bias in any meaningful way?

Factory farm's are abysmal and should be properly regulated, but it's the only argument that vegans actually have. A well husbanded animal, arguably lives a much better life and death than it's wild brethren, and I'm happy to support that animal;bc I fookin love cheese...

OK, so you think that tapping into this AI epoch means that we can understand the reality of being a human better than actually being a human??? That's what the machines want you to think... 🙄 Philosophy is designed to strip away bias, not to find an algorithm that reinforces them.

Indeed, like the common vegan argument; that bc of factory farm's, all animal product's are tainted bc of the moral imperative to not cause suffering. I get that, but a more fundamental moral question must be, does a well husbanded animal live a better life than his wild brethren? If so, then we sould all eat freelance and be thankfull for the cheese...

If we both agree that said product is worth said price, then value is an objective truth between us;supermarket's upsize this phenomena, especially when they discount the product because of the sell by date; and thus it caters to every layer of imagined wealth over value. You seem to have strayed from the topic at hand: How does any of this, constitute or facilitate a new way of thinking?

In answer to the topic title, we can't help it; if science work's, something's will advance, it's an evolutionary imperative.

Well, a computer is an object which, unless subject to some sort of linguistically twisted reasoning, should be a clue. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this is seems like utter bollox. This for instance,"is Recognition, of a value given. It can't be either positive or negative.It can't exist.", I've already explained how fair exchange for both parties (work's). the subjective bit, and the value is the objective bit, agreed by both parties.

You lucky duck...

It depends, how many bears did you drink???

Indeed, once they painted themselves into a corner, they thought outside of the box... Yes, when in a pub fight possibility, shout "hold me back" and hope to fuck that your mates aren't so pissed that they just ignore you, and settle down for the nights entertainment... 😉

Hmmm, I strongly disagree with something I don't understand, "mind the gap"???

Haven't you learned anything??? 'Mind the gap' is an underground meme...

Indeed, which is my point...

Ok, so how does a computer replicate that?

How does binary provide a random number??? It's a very complex process, with maths way above my paygrade, that doesn't work; I do it by shuting my eye's and spinning around a couple of time's, before I throw a dart at, something...

Indeed, science should go underground and work on its gorilla tactic's... Even a pacifist can blow shit up, for the greater good...

But not in a way that makes sense. My bad, no disrespect @zapatos...

Simplification is only useful, if the teacher deems it necessary to lead the child over a speed-bump in their undertsanding. As I've explained, binary is not a useful method to explain reality...

I do indeed, as do you...

So, you respond to post's you don't understand with post's you don't understand, you are guilty of that...

Is it though, we're twelve pages into troll paradise, what if god did it; we both know he didn't, so we're just talking semantics...

Education should be an obligation of the state, if it wants to learn how to be a better state; but if it just wants to make money, then it doesn't matter what 'they' learn...