dimreepr

If we both agree that said product is worth said price, then value is an objective truth between us;supermarket's upsize this phenomena, especially when they discount the product because of the sell by date; and thus it caters to every layer of imagined wealth over value. You seem to have strayed from the topic at hand: How does any of this, constitute or facilitate a new way of thinking?

In answer to the topic title, we can't help it; if science work's, something's will advance, it's an evolutionary imperative.

Well, a computer is an object which, unless subject to some sort of linguistically twisted reasoning, should be a clue. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this is seems like utter bollox. This for instance,"is Recognition, of a value given. It can't be either positive or negative.It can't exist.", I've already explained how fair exchange for both parties (work's). the subjective bit, and the value is the objective bit, agreed by both parties.

You lucky duck...

It depends, how many bears did you drink???

Indeed, once they painted themselves into a corner, they thought outside of the box... Yes, when in a pub fight possibility, shout "hold me back" and hope to fuck that your mates aren't so pissed that they just ignore you, and settle down for the nights entertainment... 😉

Hmmm, I strongly disagree with something I don't understand, "mind the gap"???

Haven't you learned anything??? 'Mind the gap' is an underground meme...

Indeed, which is my point...

Ok, so how does a computer replicate that?

How does binary provide a random number??? It's a very complex process, with maths way above my paygrade, that doesn't work; I do it by shuting my eye's and spinning around a couple of time's, before I throw a dart at, something...

Indeed, science should go underground and work on its gorilla tactic's... Even a pacifist can blow shit up, for the greater good...

But not in a way that makes sense. My bad, no disrespect @zapatos...

Simplification is only useful, if the teacher deems it necessary to lead the child over a speed-bump in their undertsanding. As I've explained, binary is not a useful method to explain reality...

I do indeed, as do you...

So, you respond to post's you don't understand with post's you don't understand, you are guilty of that...

Is it though, we're twelve pages into troll paradise, what if god did it; we both know he didn't, so we're just talking semantics...

Education should be an obligation of the state, if it wants to learn how to be a better state; but if it just wants to make money, then it doesn't matter what 'they' learn...

IOW a transaction is considered fair when both parties agree... So, what's your point, as it relates to a new form of philosophy (the question asked)?

To be fair, the last time I explicitly called someone a troll I nearly got arrested, it's hard work to figure out a more subtle implication...

Someone in the bible, do you deny that tolerance was mentioned in the bible? I think it might have been Jesus, whoever he/she was. 😉

It's a really ill defined question, to base a model on... When does a bar fight become a war? Can a pacifist accumulate agression with exposure? And is that an illness? What is it your asking?

Not in the classic sense...

Yes, but only when you're ready to listen, and there in lies the irony that you don't understand...

Do you want me to explain?