dimreepr

A new low in a long list of facile arguments: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/04/trump-nra-london-hospital-knives

Today you learned, the internet has a lot of shit... to be angry at.

Use a pillar drill clamp horizontally, held in a vice you can also hold a steadying platform in the same vice, works a treat.

Air works best: http://wiki.lspace.org/mediawiki/index.php/Death's_Scythe

Lol +1

That's why I don't report them, they're generally just confused. And it's quite funny.

P.S. that ones for me, not Raider. Xposted

Indeed, I keep forgetting to add an emoji. P.S. that ones for me, not Raider.

Who knew?

Guns don't kill people, but people with guns...

People don't kill for fun...

History would suggest otherwise... India, America, South Africa etc... Afganistan, for example, every nation that sought to subjugate them had more/better guns ...

LOL, OK I concede that point. Well, history suggests more guns doesn't lead to victory...

Most martyrs would disagree...

Would it be possible to have an edit history feature?

Who knew a servant would resent an arsehole from the ruling class?

The chemistry of being called a fucking moron perhaps.... wait for laughtiming (oh shit).

That's why the NRA spends so much money, they realise the slippery slope isn't always a bad thing, even if it leads to an ever-diminishing balance sheet.

The problem only seems intractable, big money/power is often the source of its own downfall. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_matchgirls_strike_of_1888

That's kinda my point when I started this topic, only one side wins... People. Of course not, but people are people and some people lose their shit if they lose their phones, even if they didn't have them yesterday. I'm 100% sure that if you (zap) had the choice to kill or hand over your gun, you'd make the right choice.

I do have some sympathy, I've personally witnessed someone go into meltdown because they left their phone at home and won't get their hands on it for 6 hours.

There are always sides, however benign and well-thought-out the regulation, the only real difference is when they aren't well thought out or benign, there are no guns to take revenge on the pricks...

Do I have to quote you?

It's about which side will pack the biggest political punch, after all, there's no-one more determined to end smoking than an ex-smoker. It was a throwaway line with a satirical twist about which side wins; when only one side can ever really win.

Perhaps or perhaps the money needed is exponential.