dimreepr

In answer to the topic title; the difference is intent. BLM had banner's that explained why they're protesting... And the easiest way to discredit that explination, is to provoke violence...

That's really interesting, because there is no evidence in history, that anyone thought the earth was flat; it's a modern phenomena.

Yes, they are; I didn't mention the height of the step. 😉

If they walk backwards from the start (testing at each step, how level it is), until the start can't be seen, then climb one step; then, as if by magic, the start is visible. 🤣 You should read their bible, "Disc World" by Terry Pratchett.

Thanks, glad I asked, shame I don't know any, sound's like it might be quite a laugh. 😆 Off the top of my head, you could mention the test track of one of the German car maker's, it's so long and level you can't see the end, until you climb up an ordinary step ladder.

I have never debated with a flat-earther, I've often wondered how they explain the fact that you can see farther, the higher up the observer? Perhaps you could ask for me, I'd love to hear how they explain it. 😉

Indeed, yet here we are...

Isn't doublespeak a reference to, the other side? If you have just shat on my rug?

Let me ask again, how many people do you know, that would qualify to be in the control group?

Only if you can tell a freedom fighter from a terrorist. He had very specific view's on the Spanish civil war. Yes of course, "but I find very little upside to, you have just shat on my carpet" - Frankie Boyle

How many people in the study, use cell phones?

Who guards the guardian? As can anyone who is anonymous on social media...

Eugenics' by any other name, smells as bad.

I can only imagine that

Is it possible that we're talking about different people?

He was my doctor.

Yet still, we learn. 😇

Some time's, more words explain less... 🤔

I wasn't referencing your mention of fish, I just think it neatly sums up the problem at hand. I'll paraphrase "Don't come to our country poisoning our fishing water's, then turn up 400years later, on your gap year, talking a lot of shit about fish." You can with an oportunity to learn.

BTW did you whatch Frankie at 25:30ish? Because you're talking a lot of shyte about fish. Frankie explained it better at 44:30ish though.

Because nobody is arguing that people aren't equally able; the aim is equality of opertunity. We're talking about people not spreadsheets, but while spreadsheets are used to prevent equality of opportunity, they're using different heading's. You should assume that my level of comprehension, is roughly equivalent to my level of eloquence; for further clarification just ask MigL. 😉

I was suggesting that you think about the consequences of what you're saying. Now I'm asking, what does that even mean? "if you wish to address poverty", teach people.. I encourage you to watch the it all, but the relevant part starts at 25:30'ish...

Imagine that...

One day, we will see the true value of affordable; but I fear that day will be one day too late...

Perhaps, but I have enough to eat in this one... I just wish you had Markus' eloquence.