dimreepr

It's only a problem in multi-variable logic.

Indeed, joigus; are you batman?

I wonder when that equation really worked...

Like a BEC is different, where light just walks by...

I've not given you a neg rep, but they are an excellent source of understanding... But thank you Prof, are you using google to translate between our language's?

Not everyone can afford to choose the more expensive option; like in "The grapes of wrath" the company employs it's customer's. To exploit starvation, to the point of throwing away excess food and guarding the dump. Unregulated corperation's have no morales, that's where I think some of us are equally culpable, a vote doesn't cost anything. But we're to busy guarding the dump.

ohh, I give up...

Yet you insist on steering it...

You weren't...

No, just a lack of understanding...

because it's funny, when you guys try to explain it...

Doh, It was intended as a joke... 😣

I could explain it to you, but I'm not sure where our relative understanding, coalesces...

Not even the person who first coined it? For instance, you're a "Thorhamanitist" I know what it means, do you?

If you can't read it, is my point. Maybe it's cultural... In some culture's it's common to invoke a deity before doing something dangerous e.g. saying "insha allah" before overtaking a lorry on a blind bend; it would be arrogant to assume they're blind to knowledge or understanding.

Newton's message is written in the most robust language known, in a continuous culture that has been building on that understanding, to the point that we understand why his message is incomplete; let's not forget, he was also an alchemist and given his prophetic qualities, had he solely focused on that, it's plausible that he might have been. Not concrete but plausible, paganism for instance, given their (original) knowledge of herbs and natural remedies'; It's reasonable to assume they we're the scietists of their day, and there's no evidence to suggest that's not same for Buddha. I'm not saying Einstein will be deified, I'm just saying it's plausible; every empire has it's day and then dies...

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

I recognise that shame... 😣

My incompetence at getting my point across, is underlining my point; transfering my understanding to other's take's skill and talent (not my wheelhouse). Markus, you are living proof that what you say is possible, but even you had to be taught the fundamentals before you can teach yourself to the level you've achieved; I believe that may have blinded you to my point, which is, prophet's are rare. But as chinese whispers demonstrate the longer the chain/wider the gap, the greater the message is corrupted. So, given enough time or a long enough chain, understanding is lost; I understand that mathematics is a very robust language, but that's because I've been taught the fundamental's well enough, I'm just not capable of understanding why (I'm in the middle of the bell curve). That's why I believe Einstein could become a prophet like deity.

I could teach you how to grow your own, but I doubt my teaching would enlighten you... 🤪

What was once written by man can be written again, but without a teacher what language would we use? We're all subject to the enthrall of our teacher's, enlightenment is understanding that we're not limited to their teachings...

Did they get, counselling? It's a bitter sweet symphony...

And getting more so, on this swing of the pendulum; let's hope the next swing will stop the clock, though history is not on our side...

I'm not assuming your level of understanding, but for me, I believe he was a genius and often argue in his favour; Imagine this site bereaved of those capable of filling the gaps in my understanding, Markus et al, I wouldn't just stop advocating his genius. Like Trump...

But they have knowledge of the paper and it sort of makes sense, why would it fade away with so many advocates?