derek w

All particles have a field.

What happens to wave function at absolute zero?

The universe has created consciousness,therefore it must be included in the laws of physics. Golden rule of physics,the universe has the ability to create consciousness

Surely from the moment of the big bang,the laws of physics that are imparted in the universe must have the ability to create consciousness,otherwise it's a complete waste of time? What would be the point of a universe without consciousness?

All particles have a wave function,so does it not stretch the wave function of all particles that travel over vast distances? Could it be that the energy is absorbed by space thereby allowing space to expand? Thanks for the reply.

If the wave function is being stretched by the expanding universe,where is the energy going?

there is an article in new scientist :- "It's confirmed : Matter is merely vacuum fluctuations"

Physics reduces things by taking them apart to find out how they work,so physics reduces down to the quantum world. If you make a conscious decision eg:- to get out of bed in the morning or lay in for another five minutes,the quantum world has to go along with your decision.

I don't know if consciousness is an external phenomenon. Should it not be included as part and parcel of the universe and therefore part and parcel of laws of physics? sorry think I accidentally pressed the reputation button instead of the quote button.

Without a consciousness that is aware of the universe,there would be no point the universe being there. Could it exist without consciousness?

Is it true that there is no experimental proof that anti-matter is attracted by gravity?

From the motion of the electrons

Put a float valve in the bottom tank,that will shut off when full.

An electron can't be smaller than it's wavelength. The nucleus is smaller than the electrons wavelength.

What happens to the water after it has run down these slopes?

Wave function is balanced,it has peaks and troughs about a point of equilibrium.

x = y-1 therefore x=y

Is spin anything to do with the center of mass and center of charge not being at the same point?

It's not just proton + proton collision. It's proton + proton + kinetic energy.

T>0 anything less than that does not exist.

The best analogy between quantum and classical physics is "the pilot-wave dynamics of walking droplets". In this example the droplets and the wave function are separated rather than having duality.

Is it plausible that the wave function does not exist in 3 dimensional space? That our 3 dimensional is a surface of a 4 dimensional space or a cross section of 4 dimensions.

one other point,it would take the bullet the same time to fall to the ground,if you fire it out of the front or back of the car.

light will fall to earth at the same rate as any thing else.(9.81m/s^2)

Are all particles considered to be an excitation on the same field? Or is there an electron field for electrons,a positron field for positrons a photon field for photons,a gluon field for gluons etc? With energy being transferred from one field to another?