iNow

It allows him to give exemptions to his friends and people who support him while punishing those who didn’t or don’t.

It's also a nonsequitur fallacy from "I'm on post #2" Logos to suggest that all voters had one motivation. Yes, millions of racists voted for Trump. No, not all Trump voters are racist. Many buy into his businessman better for economy / will fix inflation with magic narrative. Some have a similar reaction to transgender issues that we saw years ago to gay marriage. Others still just want to see the system as a whole get dismantled. There is overlap in these groups, too... This isn't exactly hard logic. But yes, racism was also involved. Full stop. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_views_of_Donald_Trump Try harder

You’re right. I can’t imagine how concerning it is watching from afar, primarily bc I’m forced to watch from within. Actually, I can imagine it from afar, too. It’s concerning from multiple perspectives.

So wishful thinking and a book written by a ghost author. Got it.

And nukes, which IMO is a better explanation for European caution than absent spines.

I’m sorry you’re so much better than everyone else. Life must be very frustrating for you.

He went with Pam Bondy, Florida state attorneys general and loyalist personal lawyer to Trump in his trial

Specifically 4 votes in the senate and the most any nominee can lose is 3. Now, we wait…

Prompting LLMs mostly <jk>

It’s called freedumb you pinko commie

Were there nuclear tips on the missiles Cuba launched in this scenario? Or were they non nuclear kinetics?

Depends on the platform. For those listed, the answer was embedded above

More on the vibes vs facts and news sources being predictor of voter behavior. Source: Pew Research Center; Graph and commentary from Axios “Conservatives have a significant advantage among news influencers — a major part of the trickle-down information ecosystem. Influencers on most of the biggest platforms are more likely to lean right than left, Axios Communicators author Eleanor Hawkins writes from new Pew data. Male influencers also outnumber women on those platforms, by almost a 2-1 margin.”

Surely one of sufficient yield would suffice

Or different definitions are being used

This whole annoying series of exchanges could’ve been avoided had you simply said some or even many voters are XYZ instead of painting everyone with the same wide wrong brush

I’m just reminding us that there are steps available between physical violence and passive acceptance

Mercury poisoning and brain worms will tend to do that to a person.

I'm saying it's both. Unsure what you're saying. Which... what, exactly?

I see it more as both/and rather than either/or

It didn't exactly add anything to the conversation anyway. Is likely a system penetration and response test of some sort: "What kind of genius could come up with such a brilliant idea, exploring the entire universe with just a brain in an age when people only had eyes?"

If it hasn’t happened already, the more likely outcome is simply that the report gets leaked and published for full view by all by all of the various media outlets, especially since: