ahmet

ok ✔️

presumably this means that atoms have 3D placement. also @joigus 's comment. And what about the use of these compounds (i.e. metabolism), how does body differentiate whether such compounds are not useful/usable (i.e. harmful) or vice versa? note: I know or can accept that not everything could be classified as harmful things and vice versa , there might also be something like not harmful and not efficacious. But, here in turkey , generally medical doctors (professors) tend to say that trans fats were harmful. I am trying to understand the case.(implication). from my particular master program notes, I also know that unsaturated acids were a necessity and efficacious. simply ,how and explanation for the opposing case? from this comment ,I understand that trans fats' melting point is high. they tend to clog the veins. So ,problems are occuring in the mechanism. is this the consistence really? and does this show also that , they were not needed in fact? another question: I think we do not know or previously define how the compounds act,right? for instance ,here we know that unsaturated two forms have same formula, but because of their geometrical placement they are not same. one of them has tendency to be harmful while another one is efficacious and needed. but, in fact, we can only realise this after observation and experiments (I know that this detail is already known about TFAs) otherwise, it cannot be said whether a compound was previously harmful or efficacious (before it created and used (i.e. experiments and observations) all in all,I am again not sure really. bacause some scientific criteria might illuminate the way.

As far as I remember (from high school) it is about geometry. but...do not well what happens with these or do not know how these metabolised. I shall check the link(s). actually ,I remember this from high school but, what is the difference between these exactly? (seems same)

ah yes. trans fat is a form of unsaturated fat. thanks. And could you show me or explain: what is the difference between elaidic acid and oleic acid? a notation: I saw one turkish professor speaking on tv channel , she was blaming trans fats and advising to avoid from them. (But why ,because charonY's reply indicates that body could break down trans fats.)

hi, yes trans fats. so, as we can say that metabolism consists of catabolism and anabolism , can we say that your this answer indicates that body could either produce (naturally) trans fats or break down them? so this means ,YES human body can break down trans fats(?)

with a note before starting: I could not differentiate it well so this thread might either be considered in medical sciences or biology forum. sorry for the case. hi, I wonder whether trans lipids/oils usable in human body? among the contexts,I know that not all of saturated lipids were trans , in trans lipids , hydrogen atoms are inversed at bond points. and not all of saturated lipids / oils were useless. but do not really know anything about the certainty of information appearing in the thread. equivalently, can we say that once we obtain trans oils in known forms , then is that impossible to move away these lipids from the body up to death?

ahahaha something came to my ming like : to divide a penny from a point over its boundary along its diameter (maybe via hammer).

of course.but you can create something from theoretic parts. I mean that you could create your own application. anyway, yes. this thread is about engineering texts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vwn16r0S0_k

well, I say that ,because perspective is really effective. to me, if you have that you can achieve very bright things. but eventually we shall be able to say that these are different issues. --->> perspective --->> working hard. one of them conains talent while another does not have to. ,and a response to your another implication: I am almost sure that we would be able to create something new via rather general (even basic) theorems. for instance, bernhard bolzano had lived between 1781-1848. but that does not mean that his thorems would not cause new results in the far future (e.g. 2200) I do not really believe that any book's importance/value/prominence would be measurable via its cover page (i.e. appearance) nnnnever !

ahahahaha ha aha ,congrats for your effort with such studies. but, I do not think so. it all depends on your perspective to me.

mmm, yes some of the songs I listen might/may contain ,I think this one is one of such musics but again natalie horler's voice is good,I listened her many times in the far past. the background of the music that this artist does may contain electronic dance music

mm does this mean that ...they were (particularly or " a bit" ) monotone. I shall again respect. Here in turkey we have very well fixed sentence (like in the manner of idioms but a sentence that have predicate) "pleasures and colours are not discussible" . So, whatever you say, I know that I (should & would) respect that in this regard.-but normally , I enjoy/prefer the musics which enables me to obtain/create/produce or have inspiron and sometimes intuition,in general.

a ha ah ah I respect that , really I already almost totally believe the power of "freedom" so, you and everyone is perfectly free about what to listen. hahaha haha really I have also though like that many times, but cannot stop myself sharing the musics I like. oh my gosh !

hahahah hahah ha ha , that girl really has not discovered how the love was! hahahah haha anyway, music fits you tamiga & bad. artistica , congratulations anas otman. nay nay nay , nay nay nay

I am a teacher in one of the branch of science. So,I think I can observe something from the top of the portrait or a map and normally can make some distinction between the speakers. But that thing whatever we say should NOT of course pass the treshold of the reality. I clearly remember what I said, feel free please to speak more clearly. I am again sure, this OP of topic is not unintelligent. What is more, he can understand and make distinction between what intented to be said and what sounded ftom the text. but unfortunately this user does not have sufficient (as swansont says "fundamental") contexts of maths. Thus everything is problem for him in this regard. anyway, perhaps some people do not want to accept the reality or cannot see it well. a recommendation: as independent researcher and maths teacher ,here I could not really judge what the OP would like to learn or ask in the work of maths. so, I recommend the topic to be closed.

oh,I am not sorry. because I have not sufficient time to worry for anything

instead this sentence, you should use this sentence, I think. "generally making somethings worse is easier than making that things better"

lol , this is not valid or inconvenient for mathworks. meanhile, I can remind that that man was not a mathematician as I know,he was physicist. And here, I do not encourage anyone to work for pure maths. I only know the way.

I do not know really such videos. Maybe causing by the novelty of the area,because springer's one journal (taht almost newly founded) publishes basic contexts too. but.. I am sure that you would be able to find many written materials on the issue/topic and do not know why you do not try that.

so, does this mean that in fact, we did not need to use soap? interesting. if not; how do we remove viruses from the surface of our hands? addition: I was almost forgetting bacteria.sorry. but the question still stands. may I ask a question: I remember you had said that we would have a probability to face a new diseaase (i.e. pandemic) in a thread. now turkish media announces a mutated version of covid19? if this case satisfies your (or proves that you were right in your prediction), how did you reach that information?