ahmet

oh , that musician! singer! it seems the time is passsed for him ,but he is ambitious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3w0SdcZLLo8 this is both qualified & and it seems it has the best timely manner... hhhyyy energetic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmFP-EUIhV8 oh,this musics seems like a parfumm

DANCE!!!!

this, follows very boring song after a well prepared or after the first song which is full of pleasure as classic for nancy.

many thanks and congratulations for this share!

actually , yes , this is again a subqestion of that core/key question. in this case,I would also like to ask a question what do you do when science does not respond anything on a case? the living event shows that you should eventually perform an action. but the interesting thing is that science is really not explaining everything in the current case or we still do not know everything. and this evolute onto qualitative thing ,like entropy. ....

you were mentioning hunger.

no,I only mentioned the existing/current time,not the past and not the future,exactly. and I underlined that I would protect my that situation (being statically and exactly "good") lol I did not say that you would need to,I only said that you could do. .so, lets start from a point. NOOOOOOOO

I have not described how being happy was. I only said that I was happy. sometimes in the past, I thought that this question might include such complex subquestions that could not even be possible to asnwer those subquestions. for instance can you describe (scientifically) how hunger was? (I think you perfectly can) and try to describe how the satiety was ? (I mean measurement,a clue : try to respond via quantitative expressions or something via chemical formulas) you will /should eventually reach a point ..but which point is really too difficult to find. (because that point will be qualitative and we know that qualitative expressions do not show their properties same at everywhere or not same to everyone)

you...you... you.. these are not as same meaning as "getting better" ,lets see each one by one: this is presumably "doing something" but not even "doing better". this is doing "something" better. no,I do not do that ,because I am good/fit in this regard. you have not seen my lovely body I think ,my memory is exactly "good" ,and I would protect this situation. not better and not the worse is demanded. hahahah a notation: I know that definitions and more clearly "things and what do we think about those things would be effective/important in philosophy". I think that having a purpose would be good in life. but personally ,I am (already) happy. someone reminded me from the "philosophy of science " course, a book ; I do not remember who had written that book but I approximately remember the name of book it was ; "nice/joyful science" within this,I think our point of view across life is effective on how tos and nots...(especially regarding "doing" science).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytGP7-NMlmw oh nancy! I can depict your portrait as the picture of lovely lebanese musics. somewhat from old days.

so,you mean if I don't get better, then I won't survive to..and won't adapt. first ,I thought (and also allege) : "being good" would differ from "getting better". I am still sure that I am good. also sometimes I can add : I am anciently way romantic and handsome hahahaha mmm,well, I can let you consider this probability however, which rule you exactly mention (is not clear),can you provide some additional contexts?

this will be off topic ,but based on your query;I can suggest you check these topics in complex analysis --- >> residues and solutions --- >> C-R equations --- >> analitic functions and their properties. also, further: you can look to: --- >> conform transforms strong integer, I have not heard it until now. (Weak limit does exist , but it seems no correlation with this) what is more, when you mention a conjuugate you mention just one complex number. But if you are finding more than one conjugate number ,then most probably you mention complex functions. For this specifically check please : C-R equations,this might be helpful.

all is good and well if we just consider BSc level maths (for science areas other than maths).(meanwhile,yes I am currently official educator (but I generally would be known with the things which I do as hobby or in my spare times. ))however, As a general point of my advice ,I can recommend side sciences. I also do not underestimate or miss that you particularly show some correlations maths with physics. but this is not sufficient to me.so,I can say that.(as I overviewed just one material (for educators)) I can say that you presumably worked hard. but working for useful things is also crucial and effecticve. Kind Regards ahmet

again I did not understand what '"strong" integer' meant and have you implied the symmetry via the underlined phrase?

gosh!, the only thing I am addicted is musics .. lets see a delicious one:

nope. the sun is shining every tomorrow to me even though the degree of brightness of shine is not as same as my personality hahahahaha

in this case, I prefer to say : I AM ALREADY GOOD , WHY AND HOW TO GET BETTER ?

what does "getting better " mean ? I may think inversely , because I would like to remain young ,healthy and , and,....and simply static. ahaha if you are asking what our purpose would be each, I am sure that each will change one by one if you are asking what should it be,then ,well you are trying to asnwer ,but this will include risks to respond. I personally do not explain purposes ,why to do that ? because I am very cute hahahah one very important sentence will be good to share : I LOVE MYSELF , THIS IS THE RULE TO FEEL HAPPY ,I BELIEVE.

sorry but I did not understand what you exactly imply or what the correlation was ,with this thread. could you provide more details please?

I knew this as "a medical knowledge that runs/works but does not have; a suitable place or is not convenient to be existed amongts the current, medical literatures furthermore, that is really available (I believe ,because I saw and observed!). maybe we might discuss it in suitable place of forum.

I was also thinking this. And gave a potential probability to wtf 's notation , stating or pointing out : [math] e^{i \theta } = cos(\theta) + i sin(\theta) [/math] formula. but as I realised that OP has no basic knowledge in analysis,I did not want to give any instructions in complex analysis. so, automorphism seems like useless to mention for ensuring the OP understand the issue

I suppose you cited my previous comment. well, but interestingly almost the same styles may have wide ranges of fans while that mentioned music was not being supported. All in all you might be right. because there are some artists that have good musics ,but just one sample is good. ,,or I have not heard the more. for instance this one: although I enjoyed this, it is listened just over 2 million. I have more smaples but this one seems enough for now. thanks for stating your opinion.

...removed. might be updated later.