Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/04/21 in all areas

  1. I think what he is doing is because in the Torah the writing is in consonants only, so when he uses the English word God he only uses the consonants. Why he is doing that is beyond me.
    2 points
  2. 1 point
  3. The second image is an analogy which visualizes space as being 2 dimensional and bent through a third dimension. It is not representative of reality. In it all of space is the surface shown as a grid. And while the diagram shows the Sun and planets as solid objects sitting on that grid, they would better be represented as circles on the surface. Like already stated in order to make it simpler to present, 2 of the spatial dimensions are removed. Here's am animation that gives an idea of what this same analogy would look is you included the other two dimensions The other thing to keep in mind is that the "Curvature" of space-time is not an actual bending of anything. It is a term used to convey the idea that space-time deviates from the rules that govern Euclidean geometry in the presence of mass. It is called curvature because it gives results like those you would get if you try to do plane geometry on a surface that is not flat.
    1 point
  4. You won't be banned for disagreeing with anyone. You are at a science forum, and while certainly this is in the religious section, the scientists here, and others like myself, have every right to question your "absolute claims" specifically when they are not supported by evidence. The bible is simply an obscure book, mostly based on myth, written in an obscure age, by obscure men. If you want yes answers with no questions asked re your claim, then your best bet is to go to a forum where similar unscientific beliefs are the norm...Freewill is imho, simply a product of evolution that enables reasonably advanced Apes to make decisions, reason, chose, and act independantly. Others might argue that in reality we do not have freewill, as that and us, are governed by the laws of physics. Also the quantum world and/or determinism may have some effect on what some may determine as freewill. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40509-014-0008-4 "Quantum theory and determinism usually do not go together. A natural combination is quantum theory and randomness. ... But I feel that we should not give up the idea that the Universe is governed by a deterministic law. Quantum theory is correct, but determinism is correct too". https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40509-014-0008-4.pdf Abstract: Historically, appearance of the quantum theory led to a prevailing view that Nature is indeterministic. The arguments for the indeterminism and proposals for indeterministic and deterministic approaches are reviewed. These include collapse theories, Bohmian Mechanics and the many-worlds interpretation. It is argued that ontic interpretations of the quantum wave function provide simpler and clearer physical explanation and that the manyworlds interpretation is the most attractive since it provides a deterministic and local theory for our physical Universe explaining the illusion of randomness and nonlocality in the world we experience. 6 Conclusions: "In this paper, I reviewed the interpretations and the fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics, arguing that, contrary to a popular view, quantum theory can be considered as a deterministic theory describing Nature. The theory has two parts. The first part is physical, mathematical, the one to which I attach the words “ontological” or “ontic” (without attributing a distinction between them). It is a counterpart of the theory of particles and fields in classical physics. This is the part of a theory about what is in the physical Universe. Although I discussed several approaches, I find by far the best option to take the wave function of the Universe, and only it, as the ontology of the theory. Major part of the paper explains why I have this view. I also review numerous recent works on the subject pointing in this direction. The theory of the wave function is a deterministic theory without action at a distance. It is the theory about what is, irrespectively of us. Even quantum observables, like momentum, energy, spin, etc. which are frequently considered to be the starting point of quantum mechanics, are not considered ontological in this approach. Thus, various uncertainty relations between quantum variables do not lead to indeterminism". ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: personally, I havn't got a bloody clue as to where freewill comes from, but am inclined to accept that it is simply a product of evolution.
    1 point
  5. When it happens (which all available evidence thus far indicates as the most likely outcome), that definitely won’t be the reason.
    1 point
  6. I've seen a solar panels on police stations and a few churches around here. Also, the works department just added some more. Several other community buildings have had them for years. These might be enough to charge the city's vehicles - except they haven't invested in any electric ones, and have cut back on the plans for the new city hall - just not enough money. No municipal government ever has the money to carry out its optimistic plans.
    1 point
  7. I believe the answer is that no one knows for sure. https://www.insidehook.com/article/vehicles/electric-cars-more-likely-catch-fire
    1 point
  8. That IS plastic surgery !
    1 point
  9. If someone thinks you need an MSDS for the stuff you put on your food, they have failed to understand risk assessment.
    1 point
  10. 1 point
  11. To expand of swansot's post: When you look at the spectrum of a distant light source like a star or galaxy, the spectrum will contain bright and dark lines. These are the emission and absorption lines from the different elements in the source. Every element has a distinct pattern of lines that occur at a particular point of the spectrum. If the light from the source is absorbed/scattered, you will see a dimming of a certain part of the spectrum, but those lines will still be there, in the same pattern and same part of the spectrum because all that is happening is that you are receiving a smaller proportion of light from one end of the spectrum. With red/blue shift, what we see is all these spectral lines shifted to new positions in the spectrum. So for example, a pattern that normally is in the yellow part of the spectrum will move towards the orange. You may not even notice much of a change in the overall "redness" or "blueness" in the spectrum as a whole, as non-visible frequencies shift into the visible at the red end, and visible light at the blue end shifts into the non-visible range.
    1 point
  12. No non-baryionic dark matter effects have been observed either (all experiments failed to show these effects), that doesnt stop scientists and crackheads believe fairy dust is real and makes up 85% of the matter in the universe. Can I at least have the same treatment ? Thanks. So that means that Fritz Zwicky, who invented the term Dark Matter, was uneducated as well, because that gas theory is his not mine ! I find it amusing that scientists who obviously confirmed his theory, by detecting that huge amount of gas he predicted to be the missing or dark matter, are also the ones who infirm it, by inventing a lame excuse like 'but its baryionic matter'- which has no relevance whatsoever, as Zwicky never said it has to be non-baryionic, and it makes no difference if the missing dark matter is baryonic or non-baryionic, or both. They probably just added that part to get funds for countless failed experiments in search of their non-baryonic fairy dust.
    -1 points
  13. I'm no bot just A very vivid writter with very vast amount of knowledge and understanding. Know we have freewill some deny it but to deny that we can choose is to deny the very thing we are and that is to be human. We human can make our own destiny did freewill exist before creation ? yes it was the devil and he is an example one that I do not like but still he coveted the lord's power and wish to be on his throne that is only he's. He was without flaw and yet he went to error and paid the price no being human isn't the cause of freewill, the devil choosed to do wrong because he thought and thinking of your conscience is what makes us think we were not made like the devil but we have something he does not salvation ! Really your thought you process and what you use with eyes are all part of human recognition in this world but never believed what your eyes say but what your heart says for he put good in your heart and is what gives us the tools to be on the path he wants. Proverbs 3:5-6“Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight.”
    -1 points
  14. Neither , I am discussing my thoughts on the physics the internet has learnt me and asking for help to produce The Theory Of All Theories . I want a share in that nobel prize and if you help me we can all put this theory together . I have proofs , models and dark energy being lights density fits nice , a+b=1/t a singularity that is expanding and pushing galaxies away .
    -2 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.