Trash Can

There are so many easy ways to produce hydrogen gas. Aluminum and hydrochloric acid might be the easiest. But my question is: Is it safe to inhale hydrogen gas? Or do you just violently explode into a puff of random inexplicable dead-ness? I seriously couldn't find anything from perusing the rest of the the world wide internetwebs... So please answer or you will feel guilty when I explode from inhaling H2, with only the innocent intention of saying 'wasuuuup' in a high-pitched voice. Oh the horror! Egad! Thanks in advance, --who_needs_a_signature_when_your_name_is_already_written_next_to_your_post...--

I dont know if any of you had herd of this b4.. but i read about it and was astounded.. The Orion Prophecy says that the world will end in 2012. "Its magnetic field will completely reverse in one go. Phenomenal earthquakes and tidal waves will destroy our civilization. Europe and North-America will shift thousands of kilometers northward and end up in a polar clime. Nearly the whole Earth's population will perish in the apocalyptic events" Also I knew that the Mayans and Egyptians made their calender stop in the year 2012.. Cuz why keep going when theres no reason too? Scary huh? Is this a load of bs or do you think it could actually happen? and even if the poles did swit…

i got a theory for mister Hocins most planets have moons and if a moon is made out of the right material it might pull to the planet and start rolling around it with every pass the planet gets denser and the moon gets denser making more gravitational pull sucking in more material and layering it on the planet and the moon to be compressed to make more pull the motion of the universe will keap this proses going:doh:

Randi lost CONTROL over his own challenge, the deluded fool See the URL below to see how we stopped the CHALLENGE as the little fraud would obviously not pay up: http://www.centerforinquiry.net/forums/viewthread/3283/P0/ and here's something entertaining for you folks: http://youtube.com/watch?v=dqD_wcH1lHs

According to Martin Gardner, Buckminster Fuller was a pseudoscientist. Bucky, in Martin's eyes, didn't know what he was talking about, notwithstanding his development of geodesic architecture and other accomplishments. One would find Martin's psychological status to be that of an anal retentive, or one who is a chronic pragmatist. It's all Freudian, of course, still Freud permeates the foundations of many other noted psychiatrists, such as Karl Menninger or Skinner or Jung. Humans go through a series of changes in psychological profile as they grow older, but those who are cursed with some forms of mental illness are that way because they suffer from either a neurosis or …

The Jesus bed connection. This holiday, think and remember. Before the word sleep became part of our vocabulary, the word dead was used, meaning not conscious. The word dead covered all the conditions for being found not conscious. People 2000 years ago, not yet having the word sleep, would have described what the carpenter Jesus was doing as raising the dead. With hindsight, through the study of history, we can now see and understand that Jesus was raising the sleeping, by giving them beds. The manger, praying before going to bed, and the spread of furniture with Christianity, all points to Jesus being responsible for the mass utilization of the bed, in the same way …

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1164894,00.html Using Bayes theorem, a PhD physicist has calculated the probability of God's existence to be 67%! I see no flaws in his methodology and must accept his results! He also maintains his personal ad hoc out-of-the-blue calculation places the probability of God's existence in the 95% realm. Since the value calculated with Bayes theorem is lower, it's clear evidence that it's correct! God probably exists. QED.

i was recently given the dvd "What the bleep do we know" and the dvd "Down the rabithole" it was intended to be some nice food fore the brain. unfortunatly it turns out it is cult propaganda from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramtha" too bad really. i was hoping fore peer reviewd science knowledge.

I like to invite the science people here to comment on my opinion below: Thanks for any comments. Yrreg

Hi All, If you have an opinion on GOD and EVOLUTION... voice your views through this survey.... -TEB

The Australian philosopher Colin leslie Dean points Godels theorem is invald for 5 reasons: he uses the axiom of reducibility, he uses the axiom of choice, he miss uses the theory of types, he ends in 3 paradoxes and he uses vicious circle statements. Dean out that Godels uses impredicative statements in his incomplertenes theorem that makes it invalid GÖDEL’S INCOMPLETENESS THEOREM. ENDS IN ABSURDITY OR MEANINGLESSNESS GÖDEL IS A COMPLETE FAILURE AS HE ENDS IN UTTER MEANINGLESSNESS CASE STUDY IN THE MEANINGLESSNESS OF ALL VIEWS By COLIN LESLIE DEAN B.SC, B.A, B.LITT (HONS), M.A, B,LITT (HONS), M.A, M.A (PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDIES), MASTER OF …

UNIVERSE'S INTELLIGENT DESIGN via EVOLUTION is a new and exciting thread. It covers many Controversys The Scientific Controversy Five of the scientific ambiguities among many that puzzle the Earth's people and their scientists are:***** *** #1. Does the Universe have an ether atmosphere (dark matter, dark energy, particles)?** #2. Is the Universe eternal?* *** #3. Was the Universe created out of nothing during a Big Bang?* *** #4. Did a God create the Universe?** *** #5. What is the origin of life? What say you about any of the above?

1 Theory 1.1 From Section 7.10.1 and Section 7.24.3 of the Antigravitation Engine Site (hereafter called the Site) it can be known that there exit the following relations: h' = 0.27 G M M v / (c c) , (a is not equal to 0) , (1) Delta t is larger than or equal to [(0.135 G M) / (pi v v v)] , (a is not equal to 0) , (2) and Delta x is larger than or equal to [(0.27 G M) / ( 4 pi v v )] , (a is not equal to 0) , (3) where a is the antigravitational acceleration (see Section 2.3 of the Site), h' is the antigravitational quantum of action, M is the mass of the object, and v is the speed of the object. Hence it can be known that in the antigravitational field th…

Meet MrSandman a CREATIONIST!!!!!!! Both Evolution and Creation can't be provened proving both are RELIGIONS. However, Evolution has been provened wrong on several accounts. Creation on the other hand hasn't. Ask me questions. I'm young, but have enough knowledge to tackle most of Evolutionist's Beliefs.

A friend of mine knows the director of a documentary film that is in post production and that has two Oscar-winning distributors interested in the rough cut. The title is "Einstein Wrong - The Miracle Year". Although the director is involved in the field for over a decade, it is not about his own personal ideas about Einstein being wrong, but about the growing community around the world who is showing Special Relativity to be wrong and General Relativity to have no mechanism. It is also a human drama about the family in this film and together the themes are creating a buzz in the documentary world here in Los Angeles. The film has a website and trailer at http://www.e…

Part A sea the very simple paper to understand Unified Theory of Electrical Machines and Introduction to the unified theory of the universe Mourici Shachter Holon, Israel shachter@netvision.net.il mourici@walla.co.il mourici@hotmail.co.il open attachment Unified Theory9XXX.pdf

I born in 1982.1.25 why you are you? if your name is A,and now you are in israel if there is a perrson,his name is B ,he is in parkistan then you are A,and you feel you are in israel,beacuse your body is in israel,it is right in physical. but,if you are B,and you feel you are in parkistan,beacuse your body is in parkistan,it is right too in physical. so , you are A or you are B both are right in physical. so , why you feel you are A,you are not B? you are A or you are B is same in physical but you feel you are A,not B. why you feel you are A,why not you feel you are B? beacuse your soul connect to A,not connect to B.

1 you are A,I am B 2 you are B,I am A 1 equal to 2 in physical 1 not equal to 2 in real world (beacuse your soul connect to A,my soul connect to B) I am God's servant.(1982.1.25) I only do what God like me to do. I thank God for God's bless to this world. you know you are x, it is right in pyhsical why you know it? if you know you are y, is also right in all science logic,right in pyhsical why you know you are x,not y so if you know you are x,it is right in pyhsical if you know are y,it is right too in pyhsical why you only feel you are x? why not you feel you are y? at 5 oclock x is at israel y…

How do folks? Name's teacher, lowercase "t" always please, even when starting a sentence, as I don't want to appear pompass. I also go by the screenname "Marchimedes", which is also my street name, when the name "teacher" is taken. The nerve. What I'm looking for is for people of intelligence to check my theory. But I'm posting here instead. If you don't like attitude, irreverant jokes, insults, bragadosiousness, haughty loquasious prose, and things I'm known for that you will become accustomed to when the bleeding stops, change the friggin channel. I can't spell to save my life. But poor spelling does not stop a pyramid from gettin built or negate …

So, what is your take on this question? It just popped into my head just now and I'm not sure what to think.

I need help in converting seconds and second-derived units into meters, kilograms, seconds, amperes, kelvins, moles and candelas as follows: 1s¹ = FORMULA = ? m (how many meters fits in 1s¹) 1s¹ = FORMULA = ? kg (how many kilograms fits in 1s¹) 1s¹ = FORMULA = ? s (how many seconds fits in 1s¹) 1sº = FORMULA = ? A (how many ampers fits in 1sº) 1sˉ¹ = FORMULA = ? K (how many kelvins fits in 1sˉ¹) 1sº = FORMULA = ? mol (how many moles fits in 1sº) 1sº = FORMULA = ? cd (how many candelas fits in 1sº) because I want to make fully consistent septenary system of units that are derived from day and week. I know dimension of these seven SI base units in geometri…

I came across this weblink last night, and I must say that it really did bring about a lot of questions...not only about the real occurence of certain events, but also the way of our government...It was really kinda creepy watching it. It gave me the chills. But that coulda been because of the background music included Neways, here's the link: http://www.sahaskatta.com/html/videos_2.html#Main. Basically, this video presents a different theory about the plane crash in the Pentagon, and I must admit that some of what was being presented in the video seemed kinda convincing, to say the least. It's pretty self-explanatory, so I recommend that you guys check it out. If an…

Time is very simple, once you get it. But “getting it” is very difficult. That’s because your current concept of time is so deeply ingrained. You form a mental map of the world using your senses and your brain. You use this mental map to think, and you are so immersed in it that you can’t see things the way they really are. You are locked into an irrational conviction that clocks run, that days pass, and that journeys take a length of time. It takes an open mind, and logic to break out of this conditioning. First of all we need to look at your senses and the things you experience. Let’s start with sight. Look at the picture below: The central portions o…

No formal language can be both consistent and complete But the universe is complete How? TIME! We exist as a succession of meta-languages, each one describing the next in succession They form part of an infinite set, which together is complete That's it! Time is simple! BWAHAHA! In your face, guy who started two "Time explained" threads!

Please , Who can explain following: 1A: A sentence in Bible Ezekiel Book: “… … a whirlwind came out of the north, … … Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures. … … they had the likeness of a man” (KJV, Ezekiel 1:4-5). 1B: The biological scientist definite that human DNA molecule is a “right-handed” double “helical chain” that is composed by “four kinds of nucleotides” that they encoding the “human biological body”. 1C: Obviously, Ezekiel saw a DNA “helical chain” as a “ whirlwind”; saw “came out of the north” as DNA “right-handed” helical; saw the “four kinds of nucleotides” as “four living creatures”; saw “encoding human biological…