Speculations

20 reasons which show evolution is not science Most of the quotes are taken from evolutionists own words found in there own books and articles. 1. Evolution has never been observed Evolution has never been observed and leading evolutionists have even admitted evolution cannot be witnessed in the lifetime of an observer. The lack of a case for evolution is therefore most clearly recognized by the fact that no one has ever seen it happen. Richard Dawkins: ‘‘Evolution... hasn't been observed while it's happening.’’ G. Ledyard Stebbins: ‘‘… the major steps of evolution have never been observed.’’ 2. Evolution relies upon non-observable time periods…

I'm pretty sure that's dead on.

Anyone be leave david wilcocks theory's on youtube. David Wilcock has some good youtube presentations on space and time ECT he believes their were people on mars some time ago who were like a big influence on life on earth, not saying he is right in any way just that he has his shit together so to speak. He says something is going to happen in 2012 that will change life on earth forever, guy is worth watching.

Is Area 51 real and is the government hiding something from us? Is there any proof of its existence?

I think this is the correct place to post this... I had an idea... Although it could be someone elses and I didn't know or forgot... Perhaps gravity [and perhaps other forces] act on space-time. This would cause the space-time to 'crumple' around high gravity objects which would mean time gets progressively slower the closer you are to those high gravity objects. [so space-time has 'higher density' near things with gravity.] The slower time is because more time has to pass. Now there are two more 'side ideas': 1. Gravity [and other forces] may be free from the effects of time. This would mean as an object passing a high(er) gravity object would move slower because…

Hi Instead of dark energy [2] driving matter [5] outward in an unknown way, it is more convenient to state that is pulled by / accellerated by distant matter. [6][7][8] This distant matter could be pushed off as a dust shell in the first hot phase of the big bang expansion proces. This distant matter is than forcing the universal cooled dark matter to move and to expand. The distant matter could behave like the Oort belt [10] It could be that this distant matter was not superheated because of the one sided pressure, so this matter could be also mostly dark and in its ancient pre- big bang form. The observed universe expansion is than accellerated b…

Trying to grasp a single meaning from the many scientific experiments today leaves me at a total loss. Look at the link below and tell me, is it for real? I personally hope so! Scientifically, hypotheticals abound in many sciences and most are considered gospel. If not scientific, they means nothing. Look and this and think of it as a possible road to discovery. The heading as presented, I'll wait for an honest and civil question?

Error in Rigour by Amitakh Stanford 4th September 2010 Science has been elevated as the sole authority to explain the workings of the world and to decide what should and should not be taken seriously. Science determines what should be believed, what is superstitious, and what is nonsense. In a sense, science has become the self-proclaimed judge of everything. From this vaunted position, science has imposed its will on everything, and spread its tentacles into politics, religion, education, culture, medicine, law, and practically every other field. Under the “rule of science”, anything that is supernatural or metaphysical is often scoffed at …

Hi all. This is kind of a shameless request for ideas. I'm writing a science fiction novel, part of a series in fact. The basic premise is that each star sends out a coded gene sequence in an eleven year cycle that, when created in a lab forms a sort of dark substance that then encircles the star in a dyson sphere. This substance allows for the transmission of radiation output in a narrow focus to other stars. ie, the stars are brains that act as neurons on a galactic scale and humans are the cells that create the neural links between these giant stars. This is why there is apparently so much matter missing from galaxies. The stars are obscured by dyson spheres, and the d…

Question: What is a graviton? Why are we consumed with an idea that can only be explained mathmatically, but in no other fashion? I'm not looking for an arguement over something I know absolutely nothing about, but just wondering? Is the universe based on such antiquated ploys as entropy and gravity, or will the LHC in Cern shake our brains to their roots? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

QuantumEnergetics. Quantumenergetics is based on new fundamental discoveries of quantum of space-time(quanton) and super-strong electromagnetic interaction (SEI) made by VladimirLeonov in 1996. On the basis of new fundamental discoveries the theory of Superunificationof fundamental interactions of electromagnetism, gravitation, nuclear andelectro-weak forces is completed. It is important that new fundamentaldiscoveries have the widest practical application in the development of quantumenergetics. It is discovered that the single source of energy in the Universeis the quanton in the structure of quantized space-time, which is the carrierof super-strong interaction (SEI…

This idea came to me the other day. If you look at the cell, the energy economy of the cell is based on the stored energy within reduced carbon and nitrogen compounds. This is one side of the energy equation. On the other side of the energy equation is oxidation, with O2 being the most potent terminal electron acceptor. From the oxidation, ATP energy is created, which can then be used to help enzymes drive both reduction and oxidation reactions on both sides of the energy balance. As an example of where I am heading, there is a normal middle aged spread where the body gains weight. Although the DNA has not changed relative to its genetic content, the energy balance …

4..MATTER WOULD BE THAT INVISIBLE EMPTY LOOSE THING THAT YOU HAVE NEVER DIRECTLY SEEN OR TOUCH BUT MAKES UP EVERY SINGLE THING YOU HAVE EVER COME IN CONTACT WITH IN THE UNIVERSE.<BR><BR><BR>Biological matter immitates many of the fonctions exibited by the universe so far.It grows(expansion), it eats,(combustion)<BR>at puberty we are fully opperational and can generate more biological matter (BUT at WILL). <BR>the vascular pump, the liver , the kidneys the lounghs all very advanced components witch we have no direct access to I call these the fully automatic fonctions.The fully automatic fonctions of biological matter act a lot like solid …

Many diseases can be traced back to the genetic material being turned on and off in the egg after fertilization. When we first started cloning we didnt allow the DNA to to go through this process and thus dolly the first successful cloned animal, died from numerous genetic diseases. If we were to do the same with human DNA and clone one incorrectly, we can trace many genes that make a person autistic, have varying cancers and other problems. Then through isolating many genes for certain disease we can make gene therapies that can halt, stop or even cure. Considering that isolating the genes by sampling the genome of certain groups of people with said genetic problems it …

Hello, I am new here. Could there be, that bright stars, we see on the sky are only a half of the clockworks of the sunshine, we receive on the planets? Could it be, that bright stars are feminine and dark stars are masculine, also exist. Bright meaning, that they are noticed by their sunshine, dark meaning, they are sucking on the sunshine instead of shining it away. These dark stars would couple with the bright stars and suck on them, causing them to sweat the sunshine around. The sunshine would spread evenly around, as the star rotates around her axis. In other words, can the stars be sweating the burn, because something is pulling on it? When the dark star would…

MYSTICAL OCTOBER PROOVED STRONGER NOT STRANGER MY LOST IS A FOUND WILL I SPIT OUT OR SWALLOW ,MOONLIGHTS AND SHADOWS SHARED FEATHERED HINTS I FALLOWED . IT ALL CLIMAXED HERE IN THIS KNIGHT THEY CALL HOLLOW. THE STORY OF SELF IS A LINK NOT A KNOW. A BEAT MUST BE STRONGER THAN A THINK THAT JUST WANDERS SILOUHETTES AND STILLNESS TRANSGRESSING IN BLISSNESS ,ALL CONSUMING THE TERMAL TANGO WHEN ONE SYSTEM INSISTS THEN THE OTHER PERSISTS COMME L AMOURS FOUS COMBUSTING WITH SWIFTNESS LOVE IS 2 PART INSANITY FOR 1 MEASURE OF SELFISHNESS CONVERTER.FORM MELTER GREAT RESIDER OF ALL CORES CONSERVING WITH IRON WELDS THE SUBSTA…

Before i start i would like to say i am not a scientist and have no qualifications, what i will type is speculation i had after reading an article by Stephen hawking (http://www.dailymail...me-machine.html) In that article he mentions he did an experiment where he made a party invitation and only planned to tell people about it afterwards, no one turned up as expected which means either travelling through time is impossible or the visit to his party was not worth the effort (which may be considerable) This provoked me into thinking about time travel myself, i dismissed the idea of actually travelling back or forward in time because it seems impractical, what i did…

Hello, Please allow me to inform you about my discovery: The Gravitational isolator. Having the proven interaction between light and gravitation (deflection of light by a gravitational field, fact resulted from the general theory of relativity, also proved experimentally), here comes my idea, by thinking to invert the values of this process so that a high enough density light field will isolate a weak enough gravity field. The complete article with images, short movies etc. can be found at: http://gravitationalisolator.net63.net/

I thought about just attaching this to my Aether thread to end the Aether thought, so to speak. One thought has led to another. However with the new thought the subject changed enough that I wish to remove Aether from its substance. The new thought is an effort to define space. There do not seem to be many direct values I can give to space. 1. It can be occupied. 2. We can think of it in terms of volume, which means we can divide it into units of measure. 3. Any other defining value is related to what occupies space. 4. Any observation, of that given volume, can be affected by what occupies space outside our chosen limits of observation. 5. Space is a medium; any e…

Proof of that value of observed dark energy(10-47GeV4) I’m sorry, I can’t English well. Please, understand my insufficient explanation! The value of observed dark energy has been proved in accordance with theoretical computation. ρde = (0.134 ~ 3.34) X 10-47GeV4 : Theoretical computation ρobs = 10-47GeV4 : Observed value Please have a look the attached proof and inspect the findings. ============== *Potential energy between positive mass and positive mass has - value:[math]U = \frac{{ - G(m_ +) (m_ +) }}{r} = 1U_ - [/math] *Potential energy between negative mass and positive mass has + value:[math]U = \frac{{ - G( - m_ - )(…

Hi everyone. I'm a writer, amateur comedian, philosopher, and have always had a great interest in science and skepticism. Recently I started writing articles for a site entitled "Things that Shouldn't Still Exist." My most recent article is on hatred towards science (which seriously has no right still existing-- particularly in developed nations). Anyhow, I'm always looking for more topics to write about, so if anyone has suggestions, let me know. So far, I've also covered: Racism, Ghost Hunting, Square Dancing, and Circumcision. The site is an odd mix of philosophy and humor (which is necessary when you're an analytical thinker in a world of dubious, frustrating c…

Elementary particle — autosoliton or the connected groups of autosolitons among fudls. They self-arise from vacuum — disorder area of the Lattice — owing to fluctuations of oscillatory and transfer activity of fudls. So, self-arisen photons represent not that other as "relic" radiation. Full text: http://vak.jino.ru/particles.html

INTRODUCTION Fundamental mechanics — new section of physics investigating structure of space and behaviour of its elements. Feature of fundamental mechanics is possibility of realisation of only virtual experiments with fundamental elements of space — for the obvious reason: these elements have extremely small size. Fundamental laws of physics — Postulates — can be postulated only, but are not deduced, as they do not follow from other physical laws, and very much the other way. To check up correctness of Postulates it is possible, having convinced by that from them known laws of physics follow. Correct basic physical laws did not manage to be created earlier a postu…

Here is a little page i wrote with a picture. I would like to hear people's take on it and what you may think. stupid? interesting? possibly true? http://davidaphid.blogspot.com/2010/11/dimensions-and-universe.html#comments David

Well the "Seneca" guns off shore where I live have been active the last few days. Mysterious booms off shore, sometimes accompanied by slight ground shaking. This occurs a lot more often than is normally reported, if you spend lots of time on the beach you are likely to hear these "booms" many times a year, not often but occasionally they become so loud people inland hear them as well. It is claimed that Native Americans reported these booms long before jets, or guns... http://www.starnewso...p=1&tc=pg&tc=ar http://earthquake.us...opics/booms.php