Speculations

love is love, sex is sex. why can't women separate love and sex? There is only one reason that women can't get orgasm whenever they want by their sex nature. In my eyes, I think love is love, sex is sex. There is no necessary relationship between the two. Sex is like eating, drinking or shitting. You should do it every day when you need, but you never fall in love with food, water or toilet. Do you understand? I don't know why it is so easy for me, but it is so hard for other women. When I fall in love with somebody, I want to be with him all time, and I care about everything about him. I would like to share every minute with him. When we kiss, I can…

Why, despite all the flaws in the big bang theory, does the model endure?

If the periodic table can be extended to increasingly larger atomic numbers, I was wondering if such heavy atoms could survive longer under certain conditions. If they are subject to very little radiation/energy, could the resulting calm/cold allow them to remain intact longer? Are there absolute conditions that govern the possibility of such large atoms remaining intact anywhere or could there be huge atoms floating around that will only split if triggered in some way? edit: could such atoms form very strong bonds because of their large electron shells, and if so could being more strongly bonded together chemically stabilize them against decay?

If indeed there are extra dimensions beside the three spatial and time, as indicated by string theory, then these must have a profound effect on the electro magnetic basis for the current model of neuro networks. Could it be that thought, thinking, memory and consciousness are housed in the folded dimensions indicated by string theory and the electric firing of neuroma is a discharge much like lightening in a thundercloud? That of course should have read - neurons! Damn productive ticks!

women also have refractory period after a real female orgasm After sex, men typically are lethargic and completely relaxed, and immediately roll over and going to sleep and they become unresponsive to sexual stimulation and can't get into another excitement phase until some period of time has elapsed. This recovery time is called refractory period. But no research has found that women have refractory period after female orgasm. Why is it? The answer is easy women never get a real female orgasm, they get a fake orgasm. Those women who claim that they can get multiple orgasms during one session are all deceived by themselves. They even don't know what …

Most people think of the Earth as paradise for life, so much life and so diverse, and when you look at the planets of the solar system all you see is planets totally hostile to life. But is the Earth really all that perfect or is the Earth the equivalent of a desert with a mere shadow of the life that would be possible with more of everything the Earth already has. Life in the desert scrub land of the South West US has an amazing variety, if you had never seen a tropical rain forest or anything but those desert scrub lands you might come to the conclusion that those scrub lands are perfect for life, from giant cacti to annual flowers that carpet the landscape in color thi…

I think that a black hole might be the result of the proton, electron, and neutron, all being gravitationaly pressed into the void of the strong (nuclear) force. It just seems that a nuclear exposion has a lot incommon with black holes. A black holes probably a nuclear implosion. What do ya think? IF not, what would a nuclear force field look like floating around in space? and what would it do differently?

My proposition stands on the assumption that Time and Space are physically created by an electromagnetic process of expansion and/or extension to be identified with the existing electromagnetic spectrum. With reference to the speed of light used as a term in linear and non-linear equations, I would now like to submit for further evaluation what I have here rightly or wrongly called <incongruent function>. Let us then see first what happens in the radiative field of the Scottish mathematician James Clerk Maxwell. In the linear field, all electromagnetic radiations are characterized by the linearity of the field which does not posses a binding energy and which runs …

I've learned that electrons quantum leap from one position to another in a quantum fasion. Here to there w/o traveling through the space (distance) inbetween. So I'm wondering, do they travel through a worm hole? and if so, isn't that worm hole just a momentum of proton vibration snaping back and forth at or near the speed of light?

Is it possible to extract data from within an event horizon using a wormhole? We could send a probe with the mouth of a wormhole into a black hole(accelerating the entire way if possible to minimize tidal forces) and use the wormhole to send back a signal. I can already see a few problems: Is there enough usable energy available to humans to create a stable macroscopic wormhole? Gravity might pass through the wormhole. Is it even geometrically possible to have the mouth of an Einstein-Rosen bridge on the singularity side of an event horizon? We don't know how to make a wormhole. Black holes are REALLY far away. Radiation passing through wormhole. Spaghettific…

Thisis a product designed by Inventions Designs & Concepts. But first a message. Backin the '1980' I dreamed of building a device now known as "FREEENERGY" while living in the dark in the "JVL Hood" as a Child. I seen thatmy design was too advance but I could not read or write and could not hear aswell as others. So now all the parts arehere. I present: Design by Inventions Designs & Concepts Snatching FREE ENERGY from QUARKS Look at this Design. (A) is a device I would like to call a"Lung" or "Hart" it pumps in and out if needed. The thingis that I never heard of such a device and recently found a company the produce"Carbon…

The below was my last post in a 'hijacked' thread about the 'end of space.' In review, I decided to share it on the least respectable section of this forum, "speculations" (and "pseudoscience.") Note: Speculative cosmology is not empirical science. Large scale cosmology beyond our vision (and "before the Bang" speculation) is not verifiable. Not all possible cosmologies are presently empirically observable/verifiable. Yet they may be possible. Replay: .... I do think the supernova remnant model would be an improvement over the balloon model, though... not like a perfectly spherical shell of a perfectly uniform thickness. And it is an actual explosion of material…

Have I made a misinterpretation or more somewhere? Information at hand (simplified): 1. Bing Bang shows that energy became matter. 2. Matter has 4 states depending on the speed of its molecules. (Solid, liquid, gas, plasma) 3. The faster the speed the closer to energy, and the slower the time. Conclusions (Simplified): 1. Matter is energy slowed down. 2. Everything is of the same energy, at different speeds and time. 3. Thus the Big Bang is really a slowing down of energy. I'm sure I have, if not why does it seem that way? For example, if the above is true, then wouldn't "The Big Freeze" be the o…

Hi this is my first post. I am no one special. I can't use grammer or spell properly, sorry. I would like to share something with you though. I'd like to share what I discovered on Google Earth and I made a youtube video of it. First I want to make something really clear please. It's this. AS A WHOLE, meaning the story I am sharing with you - my claim is I found the Garden of Eden AND as a WHOLE is the reason I'm saying I found it. Meaning ALL I discovered at this location makes it the Garden of Eden. Not some bit and pieces of something. It's the WHOLE locations story, that makes it the Garden of Eden. And as your watching the video, I would advise you…

Now my thinking is that when you die, you could wait an inumerable amount of years / universe births etc. until at some point your conciousness will be recreated in one form or another. So to me it seems that reincarnation is inevitable, because during the time you stop thinking, you will experience nothing until at some point you start to think again... However unlikely it may be that it happens. I'm sure what happens after death is discuessed here a lot, but I'd like to know what you guys thought?

hackintowhat [4:32 AM]: this guy stuart hameroff is a fucking genius hackintowhat [4:33 AM]: he figured out that the microtubules inside the gapjunctions between neurons and synaptic clefts are in a quantum superposition hackintowhat [4:33 AM]: he actually prooved that consciousness is a product of spacetime geometry hackintowhat [4:33 AM]: he also showed what happens when undergoing the DMT experience hackintowhat [4:34 AM]: the microtubules connection to consciousness is increased hackintowhat [4:34 AM]: so u can infer, that if consciousness is in the unified field. hackintowhat [4:34 AM]: that that unified field is intelligence hackintowhat [4:34 AM]: WOW! hack…

(very rough draft, interested in feedback, just wanted to get these ideas out there) A Formal Proof that the Theories of Both Special and General Relativity Are Incorrect followed by A Comparison of a Turing Machine to the Physical Universe, The Human Concept of Time, and a Critique of Special and General Relativity by David Ephraim Formal Proof: Part 1 (the argument here is nothing new but sets the context for Part 2): The physical universe must consist of discrete space increments because otherwise, according to Xeno's paradoxes, movement would be impossible. To reiterate, the physical universe is not continuous in the Euclidean sense beca…

what do you think of the new proposal with regard to "gravity" and the "holographic scenario"..( proposed by Erik Verlinde)?

I think a thing awoke in me, that could be a new system of the body. With it I can influence my inner body systems. I can influence my entire body by will, even the brain. It seems, by my experience so far, that the thing is in specific order, that could be studied as a new system of the body, by which you can influence an entire body with will, no exercise, no meditation techniques needed. Perhaps one can influence even hormone flow at will. Could this be somehow useful, maybe even dangerous? I can fall asleep, by will, anywhere, or speed up anywhere I want by now. I think there is much more to dig up here than that... Luka

I should think that would depend on the definition of energy. Heres my analogy: to create an IC (integrated circuit) we must necessarily have metal to manipulate into tracks and transistors to manipulate the throughput (changing the energy) but to create or discover the logical manipulation is the actual creation of energy because you have physically created something that didnt before hand exist (essentially creating a new system), this takes the same approach as pragmatism whereby we progress from past experience and try to take into account our own experience and then build on and create thing's that wouldnt otherwise exist (without the progression of past knowled…

Are scientists afraid to give their opinions in science because they don't want to be seen to go against the ' knowledgeable ' crowd ? Is this preventing the exploration of new idea's ? This is an open thread but it may be better if the ' usual suspects ' kept their opinions to themselves . I will not reply to any poster who has previously engaged in disputed discussion with me .

I have a speculative idea about wormholes. Let's say that a person (or anything for that matter) was able to pass through one, traveling through space, but also through time. If the wormhole mouths were close together, this would obviously cause some problems in terms of causality. If they were on either side of a regular sized room, then it would be possible for the person to emerge in the very recent past and stop themselves from entering the wormhole in the first place, creating a paradox. I believe this is one reason that some theorists believe time travel is not possible. But if the only reason for discounting time travel (specifically for a wormhole in terms of …

I was reading a small article and it was speaking about Helium 3, the benifits of it for energy seem well worth the trip to the moon. Why are we not doing this? Any imput on or someone fimiliar with h3 please comment. Thanks.

Light as a wave needs a medium of propagation. The aether is the medium through which propagate light waves. Light shows a surprising number of properties that were difficult to explain relatively to the aether, but which must appear as naturals, a normal result of the properties of aether. The aether must support the phenomena related to light, particles and their interactions. 1) The first property of light is the fact that it is a transverse wave. The light spreads inside the aether, so should be a longitudinal wave. Also, given the enormous velocity of light, the aether should have a considerable density, so it should be detectable. How is it possible …