All Activity

Asked my friend, who is an audiologist, what she thinks of this case. She messaged me back with this "This is nonsense and reeks of a hoax. The SPL required to shatter an eardrum is around 160 dB, which is equivalent to the SPL of a gunshot fired close to you. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/when-using-headphones-to-listen-to-music-how-loud-it-too-loud-for-kids/ mentions that the top volume level on Apple music players is 102 dB. The volume required to cause rupture of an eardrum is almost 10,000,000,000 times louder. The photos could be of somebody else's child, or a routine hearing test. There's not a single case in the literature of eardrum ruptures happening at only 102 dB. There's no reason that Amber Alerts would be any more damaging than any other similarly loud noise. This is like claiming that a bb gun pellet tore your arm off."

Granted there is likely a lot you haven't posted yet with regards to your hypothesis. I will leave the time dilation aspects to others, for the time being. The question I have is how does your theory work with Lorentz force laws? In particular regard to the cross product relations between the two as described by Maxwell equations. I'm hoping you have at some point looked at the E and and B fields under vector/spinor field treatments. Understandably you likely haven't been able to post all the pertinent details to your hypothesis yet. The equations you have posted thus far only provide scalar quantities. So understanding the vector relations between the two fields of your hypothesis would be useful. Well truthfully they will become rather essential. If your hypothesis has different relations this has huge ramifications in terms of the SM model in particular the Electromagnetic stress energy momentum tensor. So I'd like to be clear how your model handles the following formula with regards to each field \[\vec{F}=q(\vec{E}+\vec{v}\times \vec{B})\] the \(\times\) is the cross product. Not to be confused with the multiplication symbol " *" for any posts I make on this thread I will be using vector notation with \(A\cdot b\) for example being the inner product, the cross product \(A\times B\) for the cross product. I will likely not need the outer product for this discussion. for multiplication I will use \(A* B\) this is also for the benefit of other readers. Also for other readers benefit. As magnetic force as per magnetic force law \[\vec{F}_B=q\vec{v}\times\vec{B}\] there is 3 key consequences. \(\vec{v}\) is particle vector 1) As the magnetic force is perpendicular to \(\vec{v}\) it cannot change the the magnitude of the velocity. 2) as it does not have force parallel to the particle velocity it does no work. 3) Motion of a charged particle under the action of a magnetic field alone is always motion with constant speed. However it can alter the velocity direction. same relations apply between E and B.

According to relativity, if you and I are in relative motion, we both consider our clocks normal (ticking one second per second) and we both consider each others clocks to be slow. How does the above work with that?

I am aware that magnetic monopoles have not been accepted as separated, but they were detected just a couple of months ago. In a new study published in the journal Nature Materials, scientists from the University of Cambridge, the University of Oxford, and the National University of Singapore captured the first naturally occurring magnetic monopoles emerging from collective electron behavior in flecks of hematite, a type of iron oxide. I am not positing magnetic monopoles. My work posits electrons are bipolar magnets in themselves. The magnetic charge of the electron in my work is reciprocal to the electrostatic charge. The relationship is as follows: e2 = 8πα · eemax2 Here, α is the electron fine structure, e2 is the electrostatic charge, and eemax2 is the electron magnetic charge. The space quantum in which the electron resides has a 16π2 geometry where the electrostatic charge for a space quantum is a dipole electrostatic charge of two spheres (4π)2, and the reciprocal 16π2 geometry for the magnetic charge is four tubular loxodromes 4 x 4π2. Represented geometrically as: The dark blue tubular loxodrome represents the electron geometry in this image. This image is a geometrical model; it is not implied to be the actual image of an electron. Think of it as similar to Feynman's diagrams. It is a visual aid. The electron has the magnetic charge of the dark blue tubular loxodrome and the electrical charge of the blue sphere. This image is mathematically created using MathCAD 11 with available equations. This image is to be seen within the context of chronovibration. Chronovibration would be a temporal oscillation that begins at the Singularity (the point between two adjacent spheres) and traces each sphere in opposite directions in the forward time direction. When the forward time trace reaches the antipodes of both spheres, the time direction traces from both poles, spiraling inward around the axis and back to the Singularity. The rate at which this temporal oscillation occurs is the quantum frequency. I will then make it a point not to post a link to the paper in this discussion forum. However, if there are those who are truly interested in a scientific discussion and would like to read the paper, check my profile. Also, I can PM a link to the papers on ResearchGate at an individual's request. Chronovibration is measured the same way photon speed is measured. A beam of photons is sent across a known distance and back. Since it is hypothesized that each photon quantum distance (Compton wavelength) occurs within one cycle of chronovibration, then the chronovibration rate must be: Fq = c / λC Time dilation theory is based on the assumption of a physical linear timeline. A physical object cannot move from the present moment to a different time frame unless all time frames in the past and future have static physical copies of the Universe. There is no evidence for a physical timeline, yet it is used by physicists. Chronovibration is the alternate explanation for physical, linear time. Chronovibration is a physical frequency of forward and backward time. The net result is that the present moment exists and makes no progress toward the past or future. However, half-spin subatomic particles would see only half the chronovibration cycle and, therefore, see only the forward time direction within the present moment. Thus, we physically perceive physical matter and experience entropy even though our perspective does not experience entropy. No matter where our physical body goes and how it ages, our mind always has the experience of being right now. That is the verification of chronovibration. It matches our physical reality. Chronovibration is quantified as Fq as described above. It comes in precise discrete cycles. Because of the constant frequency of chronovibration, photons travel at a constant speed among space quanta. Chronovibration is a constant. Since it does not change, there is nothing to conserve. In Relativity theories, chronovibration is the physical cause of the constant photon speed in local space. Chronovibration is the reason the Relativity theories work.

...and above all...don't put a "Nuke the Bees" bumper sticker on your gas guzzling car! ..unless of course the sticker is all biodegradable material... (the "Nuke" part was my lame attempt to get back OT...LOL)

You may want to read Dies the Fire by SM Stirling. Read it about twenty years ago, enjoyed his exploration of that same idea. I don't recall any pausible explanation of how explosives were nullified, but many details of the book elude me atm. Being a pointed sticks guy (i.e. humans can't really be trusted as a species with anything beyond pointed sticks), I will follow your inquiry with interest. Sounds like the Hard SF end of the spectrum. Good place to be! I notice, when browsing the fiction section of a library, that there is a cluster of really good hard SF authors under the letter B. Stephen Baxter, David Brin, Gregory Benford, Ben Bova, Greg Bear, couple others. And of course Arthur C. Blarke! 🤔

Will probably post questions in this thread in relation to a science fiction novel I want to get to writing more. While it is science fiction I would like to get input from the community about how an effective technology I want the antagonist to have might work on some grounds in line with what we actually know about physics, science and engineering etc So my first question; How would a technogically advanced race render all human projectile weapons beyond bows, nuclear weapons etc inert and unusable? So far all I've got is computer viruses, EMP and nanobot swarms. But is there some kind of process gunpowder could undergo to be denatured enough to be useless, from a distance? Quickly and on mass? Planetary wide? Trying to build a world that has as much scientific accuracy as it's possible for science fiction to have while still being awe inspiring.

You're denying the possibility of intrinsic growth. 'Intrinsic' as in 'intrinsic geometry'. Things you can find out about without necessarily embedding them into a bigger, wider, more comprehensive ambient reality. 'Intrinsic' characterisation of geometric properties was a fundamental concern for Bernhard Riemann. Isn't it possible to define intrinsic growth? This is a question that I pose to you.

The stapedius muscle, which regulates sound intensity in your ear, cannot react swiftly enough to a sudden pecussive noise. IIRC, if the sound is continuous, the stapedius has time to react and the ability to diminish the sound up to a hundred-fold. So it can drop a 100 db sound to 80 db, the scale being logarithmic. That's why I don't use earplugs for the vac, but do use them when pounding in nails.

According to this, sound intensities starting from 150 decibels can cause eardrum rupture: https://www.chem.purdue.edu/chemsafety/Training/PPETrain/dblevels.htm Also found another article on the lawsuit which provides photos and a video: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10830803/Boy-suffered-ruptured-ear-drum-hearing-loss-Apple-AirPods-blared-Amber-Alert.html

Without links to their source and a way to vet them they are worthless.

! Moderator Note Material for discussion must be posted; just liking to a paper is not allowed. If it’s not mainstream physics it needs to be posted in Speculations and comply with the guidelines of that section

Are you positing the existence of magnetic monopoles as a cause of anomalous quantum Hall effect in different ferromagnetic materials? Are you aware that magnetic monopoles have never been detected?

I mention it as it complies with our forum rules. See the pinned threads above which contains the rules for the Speculation forum. You only need your specifics of your model not the entirety of physics lol.

Thanks! I'll rephrase my question; please give a detailed definition of chronovibration including: Measurement: How can chronovibration be measured experimentally? What specific methodologies or instruments are used? Verification: Are there empirical experiments that have verified the existence of chronovibration? If so, could you describe these experiments and their outcomes? Units and Quantization: What units (preferably in SI units) are used to quantify chronovibration? Is chronovibration considered a quantized phenomenon, occurring in discrete packets, or is it a continuous variable? Conservation and Relativity: Is chronovibration a conserved quantity within the framework of your theory? How does chronovibration behave under the principles of relativity, particularly in different inertial frames of reference? Additionally: If the aspects I mentioned do not apply, could you explain other relevant properties?

They did not know what is wrong in their logic, and I pointed that out.

OK. I look forward to learning from you in due course what tests you would propose to show the validity of your ideas.

I forget. Do you want to discuss science or the many ways you've been wronged?

That is hardly fair. I have had to read numerous texts and papers to gain my physics knowledge. You don't think you should do the same? Try to explain the physics of the anomalous quantum Hall effect to a newcomer with a simple cut and paste of the "relevant" details. You may have to wait until tomorrow for me to follow up, as I believe I have a limit on how many posts I can make according to the forum rules. I gave a brief description of chronovibration in a previous post.

What is "chronovibration"?

That appears to be what they are trying to do by posting here. That is not correct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

I know that many people dream things up without math to support them. They come after me, too. The problem with cynics, who hide behind the claims of being skeptics, is that most cynics are unable to separate equations from ontologies. There is an incorrect belief that those who discover equations get to choose the ontology to explain those equations. I fully agree with the equations of both Special and General Relativity; however, by looking at different ontologies to explain those equations, we can extend current physics much further than it currently extends. We can discover additional valuable equations, leading us to a single overall ontology that can explain everything in the Universe. For example, we use the concept of linear time to explain many of our equations. The equations involving linear time are well-tested and yield accurate results. However, there is no physical evidence for physical matter existing simultaneously in all time frames such that a linear timeline could exist. For all the claims of time dilation, no physical object has ever left the present moment or appeared unexpectedly from another moment. There is an alternative explanation that can use the same equations but explain temporal behavior in terms of chronovibration. Temporal reality may be a vibration between forward and backward time. Half-spin subatomic particles may have the "half-spin" property because they see only the forward-time component of space-resonance. This chronovibration frequency would equal the speed of photons divided by the Compton wavelength. In reality, the constant speed of photons in local space could be caused by the chronovibration frequency times the Compton wavelength. This constant vibration is physically observed as zitterbewegung and the inherent space vibration of quantum field theory. But I guess that many people will throw their arms in the air and yell "pseudoscience" because they are perfectly happy with the concept of a physical linear timeline, whether physical evidence exists for it or not. They are happy with discussing mysterious subatomic particle spin that doesn't spin spatially and want to leave it at that. All I'm looking for is a discussion with open-minded physicists who can stay grounded in equations and data and do not hold an irrational attachment to particular ontologies based on nothing but faith and familiarity. Peer review is exactly what I am looking for. What I am not looking for is a group of people who think that once an idea is agreed upon, then it becomes sacred and ineligible for questioning. It is my understanding of science that all scientific ideas are always subject to questioning even if they become popular. That is what is supposed to make science what it is. In fact, a good science teacher will not tell a student what is true or false but will present them with scientific tools and allow them to draw their own conclusion. If the science is truly settled, the student will unerringly arrive at the same conclusions as all other scientists. I found several issues with the present set of ontologies, which have been presented as settled science but which nobody has been allowed to question.

You make that sound like a bad thing. Perhaps that is part of the reason you are not getting the response you'd like while on science forums.

Just keep in mind simply linking the paper isn't sufficient where possible copy paste the relevant details here so no one is required to go offsite to look over your paper. Other than that having mathematical detail is excellent we don't mind alternative theories provided they are testable (ie mathematics). We do get some pretty wacky Speculations here if you have mathematics then it's a huge help. For latex here use \[\frac{1}{2}\.] I placed a period on last command to keep from activating. Good luck

Find out what "expanding universe" means in physics, not in your imagination.