granpa Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 A current of electric charges creates a magnetic field not a gravitational field. But a current of Gravito-magnetic monopoles would create a gravitaional field. Maybe particles with Weak hypercharge are Gravito-magnetic monopoles Neutrinos possess Weak hypercharge. So maybe a current of neutrinos would create a gravitational field Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 They would because they have momentum and energy, and that makes gravity. What is a gravito-magnetic monopole? And how does weak hypercharge tie into this at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted January 14, 2016 Author Share Posted January 14, 2016 (edited) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetismhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_hypercharge Edited January 14, 2016 by granpa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_hypercharge And? The first link has no discussion of a monopole, and the second does not mention gravitomagnetism. My questions still stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robittybob1 Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 A current of electric charges creates a magnetic field not a gravitational field. But a current of Gravito-magnetic monopoles would create a gravitaional field. Maybe particles with Weak hypercharge are Gravito-magnetic monopoles Neutrinos possess Weak hypercharge. So maybe a current of neutrinos would create a gravitational field Are these currents always heading toward the center of a mass (COM)? For gravity is toward the COM so are the neutrinos somehow directed toward the center of randomly shaped objects? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted January 16, 2016 Author Share Posted January 16, 2016 Current loops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robittybob1 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Current loops Can you explain that please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted January 16, 2016 Author Share Posted January 16, 2016 http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robittybob1 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 That doesn't really explain your idea very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Doesn't explain it at all. It appears to be completely irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted January 16, 2016 Author Share Posted January 16, 2016 what part confuses you? -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) what part confuses you?There is no such thing as gravito-magnetic monopoles. The two are separate forces or to avoid arguments on "is gravity a force" interactions. First off gravity is spin 2. Electromagnetic is spin 1/2. Google spin statistics. So accordingly it's impossible to have a gravito-magnetic boson. Neither multi pole dipole or monopole. (Quite frankly thus far this thread barely belongs in speculation forum) unless you can provide better detail won't even qualify there. ! Moderator Note in point of detail, speculation is precisely where this thread belongs. I'm going to exercise a rarely used resident expert feature. Please follow the speculation forum guidelines. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/86720-guidelines-for-participating-in-speculations-discussions/#entry839842. If you have an objection to my actions feel free to contact any moderator for fair judgement You may contact a moderator to override my decision Edited January 17, 2016 by Mordred 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 pS. Explain Particles that do not interact via the electromagnetic but do in gravitational. (Neutrinos). How do they correlate into gravito-magnitism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) what part confuses you? The part where you post apparently irrelevant links with no explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceramic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fracture Edited January 17, 2016 by Strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 ! Moderator Note Hey granpa, let's increase the rigor and clarify some of your meanings. Most of this thread's posts are asking for that. Links with no specific explanations and two-word replies aren't doing the job. Can you help us understand what you're talking about, so our answers can be meaningful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted January 18, 2016 Author Share Posted January 18, 2016 I don't know what the question is. What specifically do you not understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 I don't know what the question is. What specifically do you not understand? Why do you think there are magnetic monopoles? Why do you think they would create a gravitational effect? What does the above have to do with weak hypercharge? What is the relevance of "current loops"? What is the relevance of Gravitoelectromagnetism? In other words, everything. You seem to have posted a random mish-mash of physics buzz words with no attempt at sense or explanation. Perhaps you need to start again from the beginning and explain what you are talking about. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 ! Moderator Note OK - Thread locked. Granpa you can PM me or another member of staff to get the thread re-opened iff you are willing to follow the guidelines suggested by Mordred and Phi above. We just don't like leaving threads with seemingly erroneous claims and faulty assertions open on the main fora - when/if you are willing to defend your position then we can rethink but leaving the thread open grants an implicit credence to your claims that we do not wish to allow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts