Jump to content

Planet X now seen in constellation of Capricornus


highwic

Recommended Posts

What evidence do you have for that statement? Calculations would be a start. And that brown star stuff is already behind schedule. Shouldn't something have happened at 2012-12-21?

Edited by Fuzzwood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no anxiety here , just the truth which you are oblivios to

 

I get it. "Throw physic to the dogs; [you]’ll none of it." Just more sound and fury.

 

http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/info/press-releases/LonelyPlanet/ more than enough evidence here, a PLANET would not appear like this @ 80 Light Years , this is a Brown Dwarf Star shrouded with Iron dust which will be up close and nasty 2018-2019

 

But the evidence in that link supports the measurements that show the planet is 80 LY away. And your other "evidence" is clearly suspect. Why do you keep waving your hands around and insisting your argument is "FACT" and "truth" when you can't show anything more concrete than general hysteria?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/info/press-releases/LonelyPlanet/ more than enough evidence here, a PLANET would not appear like this @ 80 Light Years , this is a Brown Dwarf Star shrouded with Iron dust which will be up close and nasty 2018-2019

 

 

Care to post the representation you are talking about? There are two illustrations there and what evidence do you have that it is a brown dwarf up close rather than a free floating planet 80- light years away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I get it. "Throw physic to the dogs; [you]’ll none of it." Just more sound and fury.

 

 

But the evidence in that link supports the measurements that show the planet is 80 LY away. And your other "evidence" is clearly suspect. Why do you keep waving your hands around and insisting your argument is "FACT" and "truth" when you can't show anything more concrete than general hysteria?

IT DOES NOT and when it shows up naked eye visibily you will be the `1 with unmanageable emotional excesses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is this supposed to be like seeing an airplane way up in the sky but it's really an insect in the air a few feet above you? We're making a depth perception error, is that right?

Yes

 

Would you agree that if you looked at that airplane/insect from two different places then you would be able to work out how far away it really was (and therefore which it was)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFY Sean Connery Wana be, you pompous prick

 

It seems obvious you came here with an axe to grind. You haven't bothered to look up any data that would tell you why parallax has been accounted for. You tell us things we know aren't right and then insult people when they correct you.

 

I'm recommending you be banned. We don't need dark minds here, we're all about illumination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note


highwic,
The bad language will not be tolerated. This thread will be closed, and you are not permitted to start another thread on this topic. If you open a new thread, it will be closed and removed. You continuously violate our forum rules (specifically sections 2.1, 2.4 and 2.8).

Since this thread has never really been a proper discussion, we are closing the thread.

Thread closed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.