highwic Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 (edited) http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/info/press-releases/LonelyPlanet/ thats no free floating planet, thats Nibiru,in the constellation of Capricornus, same 21h as where Saturn is. I have known for a long time Nibiru was coming from that direction, it is where Uranus and Neptune were in the early 80's when they were being perturbed, so now they call it PSO J318.5-22, total DECEPTION, a free floating planet @ 80 light years would be a speck or invisible its now @ Pluto's orbit or closer Edited October 20, 2013 by highwic -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 a free floating planet @ 80 light years would be a speck or invisible Er, it is a speck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 They measured the distance directly, with parallax. It's 80 LY away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 20, 2013 Author Share Posted October 20, 2013 hey swansnot, you have disabled views and replys, IMBECILE!! -3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ophiolite Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/info/press-releases/LonelyPlanet/ thats no free floating planet, thats Nibiru,in the constellation of Capricornus, same 21h as where Saturn is. I have known for a long time Nibiru was coming from that direction, it is where Uranus and Neptune were in the early 80's when they were being perturbed, so now they call it PSO J318.5-22, total DECEPTION, a free floating planet @ 80 light years would be a speck or invisible its now @ Pluto's orbit or closer Your prediction of its appearance would have been more convincing if you had told us about it before the event. Some of us are funny that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 hey swansnot, you have disabled views and replys, IMBECILE!! ! Moderator Note Personal attacks are against the rules and will not be tolerated. Keep discussions about the topic, not the person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Was that an insult? I read it as a signature, like this. Yours faithfully Moron. But I have to say that I struggled to parse any of it. No matter how I read it, none of it seems to make sense. The real problem is that, replies and views are not disabled, so it can't mean that. I'm not sure whether swansnot is a reference to the nasal mucous of swans (which would be odd) or a misspelling of Swansont- in which case I wonder what happened to the capital letter. Of course it might also be a mistyped version of "swans not" The traditional exclamation mark for "Hey!" seems to have slipped off and been tacked on at the other end of the sentence (along with another whose purpose is unclear). The best I could do was "Hey! Swans, not you, have disabled views and replys, IMBECILE!!" which seems a bit silly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 21, 2013 Author Share Posted October 21, 2013 Was that an insult? I read it as a signature, like this. Yours faithfully Moron. But I have to say that I struggled to parse any of it. No matter how I read it, none of it seems to make sense. The real problem is that, replies and views are not disabled, so it can't mean that. I'm not sure whether swansnot is a reference to the nasal mucous of swans (which would be odd) or a misspelling of Swansont- in which case I wonder what happened to the capital letter. Of course it might also be a mistyped version of "swans not" The traditional exclamation mark for "Hey!" seems to have slipped off and been tacked on at the other end of the sentence (along with another whose purpose is unclear). The best I could do was "Hey! Swans, not you, have disabled views and replys, IMBECILE!!" which seems a bit silly replys and views were disabled and thread moved to speculation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 replys and views were disabled and thread moved to speculation Nope, just moved to speculations... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 Just as long as it is not Mondas we should not panic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 21, 2013 Author Share Posted October 21, 2013 http://www.librarising.com/space/images/darkstar.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 replys and views were disabled and thread moved to speculation Given that you could read and reply to posts, I have reason to doubt the veracity of your assertion. It was moved to speculation, however, because that's what it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 21, 2013 Author Share Posted October 21, 2013 Given that you could read and reply to posts, I have reason to doubt the veracity of your assertion. It was moved to speculation, however, because that's what it is. it is not speculation, it is FACT -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 it is not speculation, it is FACT Well then why don't you provide something besides your baseless assertions to prove it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 22, 2013 Author Share Posted October 22, 2013 well then lets start with some history of the Brown Dwarf Star http://thekolbrin.com/kolbrin_b5c3.html http://thekolbrin.com/kolbrin_b5c4.html http://thekolbrin.com/kolbrin_b5c5.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 I'm not sure what that is, but it certainly doesn't count as evidence. Should this thread be in the religion forum (or,perhaps the trash can)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Evidence in this context means scientific evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg H. Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 (edited) Evidence in this context means scientific evidence. Scientific evidence on a science forum? Your heathen logic has no place here. Begone questioner of unsubstantiated twaddle. BEGONE I SAY! And never darken our fair nonsensical ramblings again! Disclaimer: The above was meant to be funny. If you did not find it funny, please feel free to laugh anyway. Edited October 22, 2013 by Greg H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 I had a look at the Kolbrin - strange that there are no photos of the manuscripts immediately available on the website yet they are willing to sell you a copy of the modern transcrpt for NZ$250 And as this is in speculations I will add this nugget from the website "It has been rumored that Nikola Tesla acquired some knowledge from this book" Poor Tesla - one of the great scientists of his age yet picked up by every crackpot and crank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 23, 2013 Author Share Posted October 23, 2013 I had a look at the Kolbrin - strange that there are no photos of the manuscripts immediately available on the website yet they are willing to sell you a copy of the modern transcrpt for NZ$250 And as this is in speculations I will add this nugget from the website "It has been rumored that Nikola Tesla acquired some knowledge from this book" Poor Tesla - one of the great scientists of his age yet picked up by every crackpot and crank. Maybe the bootleg copy by Marshal Masters @99 USD would be more your style -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Less commentary, more evidence. Please. (or, really, any evidence) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 hey swansnot, you have disabled views and replys, IMBECILE!! replys and views were disabled and thread moved to speculation it is not speculation, it is FACT Maybe the bootleg copy by Marshal Masters @99 USD would be more your style You're using up your hour on stage with a lot of strutting and fretting. Can you kick your tale up a notch and perhaps signify something? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 23, 2013 Author Share Posted October 23, 2013 You're using up your hour on stage with a lot of strutting and fretting. Can you kick your tale up a notch and perhaps signify something? no anxiety here , just the truth which you are oblivios to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 no anxiety here , just the truth which you are oblivios to Some empirical evidence of that "truth" would seem to be in order... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highwic Posted October 23, 2013 Author Share Posted October 23, 2013 Some empirical evidence of that "truth" would seem to be in order... http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/info/press-releases/LonelyPlanet/ more than enough evidence here, a PLANET would not appear like this @ 80 Light Years , this is a Brown Dwarf Star shrouded with Iron dust which will be up close and nasty 2018-2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts