ExtraSense Posted July 13, 2004 Author Share Posted July 13, 2004 Does anyone recognize this robot/probe, photographed by the rover Spirit at the Bonneville crater on Mars? I can not figure out what is it. If you have 3D glasses, here is the stereo picture of it: The stereo is poor, but you can see that the thing is located close to the hilltop. ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superchump Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 Does anyone recognize this robot/probe' date='photographed by the rover Spirit at the Bonneville crater on Mars? I can not figure out what is it. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/extrasense/2p080-2P133467574ESF2232P2584L2M1-toy.jpg If you have 3D glasses, here is the stereo picture of it: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/extrasense/2p080-2P133467574ESF2232P2584L2M1-toy-stereo1.jpg The stereo is poor, but you can see that the thing is located close to the hilltop.[/quote'] That's Spirit's heatshield moron. Or are you going for the whole "it's a wrecked Martian Ford Fairlane" theory? http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040312a.html http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040318a/07-JG-01-pan-A074R1_br2.jpg http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040311a/09-mg-02-moc-A020R1_br.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesseract Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 Have you tried looking at Tesseract's Seizure Robots while wearing the 3D glasses? I think if you do that you might get a seizure, I WOULDNT RECOMMEND IT!!! It hurts.Dont look at killer japenese seizure robots with 3D glasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted July 13, 2004 Author Share Posted July 13, 2004 And the 3D images of the same rocks aren't exactly going to make me say "gee' date=' that [i']is[/i] compelling evidence after all!!!!" In fact, I don't even see the point of making them into a 3D image. They're just rocks. As a math forum moderator, you must be good in math. How do you like my tat about hypthesis probability inequity? As to the "just rocks", the picture below will easy dispell this obvious misconception. We have a shell, sitting on top of a big rock Here is 3D: e s Fixed. It wasn't a theorem, it wasn't even a postulate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordan Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 As to the "just rocks", the picture below will easy dispell this obvious misconception. We have a shell, sitting on top of a big rock Wait, it's sitting on a big rock? I didn't think there were allowed to be just plain rocks on Mars. I would've bet it was some kind of Martian bowling bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted July 13, 2004 Author Share Posted July 13, 2004 Wait, it's sitting on a big rock? I didn't think there were allowed to be just plain rocks on Mars. I would've bet it was some kind of Martian bowling bowl. You might be right. Tell the NASA nitwits. e s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordan Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 You might be right. Or you're just a bit crazy. Tell the NASA nitwits. The same ones who managed to get the pictures for you in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted July 13, 2004 Author Share Posted July 13, 2004 The same ones who managed to get the pictures for you in the first place? NASA is a big place, and it has competent subcontractors too. I mean their nitwit "science" team ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superchump Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 Why don't you go chasing after that heat shield a little more. Extrasense you're full of extracrap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 I think this joke is appropriate since ExtraSense likes to post here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgerlica Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 I think this joke is appropriate since ExtraSense likes to post here. lollyroffles or some such thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted July 15, 2004 Author Share Posted July 15, 2004 Those who have bought 3D glasses, go at the head of the class ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superchump Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Sorry, I've HAD 3d glasses since Pathfinder. All I see now on your site are rocks in 3d instead of rocks in 2d. Your obsession with these 3d glasses is rather frightening because they do nothing to further your "cause". They're still just odd shaped rocks. Have been, will be. A few individuals in this thread have already pointed out that they have used 3d glasses on your pics as well. And they still also don't agree with you. To us you're just a delusional nut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 To us you're just a delusional nut.When my five-year-old insists on wasting time or doing something silly we call her a goober (goober=peanut or nut). ExtraSense is the Uber Goober! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Those who have bought 3D glasses, go at the head of the class So you have not responded to my queries about Martian ecobiology (on which you are a self-confessed expert), the science teams at NASA are "nuts" in your esteemed opinion, and the ability to purchase a pair of plastic spectacles gives people more credibility. What's wrong with this picture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 I wouldn't waste the effort guys, he's blatently not going to listen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 What's wrong with this picture?It lacks a cattle prod. Dave, I'm sorry if you were going to say this eventually, but I felt it couldn't wait! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted July 15, 2004 Author Share Posted July 15, 2004 So you have not responded to my queries about Martian ecobiology (on which you are a self-confessed expert), the science teams at NASA are "nuts" in your esteemed opinion, and the ability to purchase a pair of plastic spectacles gives people more credibility.What's wrong with this picture? I thought I did. Well, look at this Super Skull. Here is the deal: Anyone who will claim that it is a rock including mister O'Keefe and his NASA cohort, will be eligible for double compensation from TV companies for stupidity resulted from watching their programming at early age. Same in stereo: e s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 You known, that particular joke gets tired real fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesseract Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 But you know whats good in stereo...a tesseract: http://dogfeathers.com/java/hyprcube.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superchump Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 I thought I did. Well, look at this Super Skull. Here is the deal: Anyone who will claim that it is a rock including mister O'Keefe and his NASA cohort, will be eligible for double compensation from TV companies for stupidity resulted from watching their programming at early age. So instead of knowing anything about geology and impact ejecta you're saying its a "skull" because it is darker than the others? Maybe you have gone WAAAAAAY off the deep end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted July 15, 2004 Author Share Posted July 15, 2004 I thought I did.Well' date=' look at this Super Skull. Here is the deal: Anyone who will claim that it is a rock including mister O'Keefe and his NASA cohort, will be eligible for double compensation from TV companies for stupidity resulted from watching their programming at early age.[/i'] So instead of knowing anything about geology and impact ejecta you're saying its a "skull" because it is darker than the others? Maybe you have gone WAAAAAAY off the deep end. Really? You can save your $3, but why blame somebody if you do not see something then? e s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted July 15, 2004 Author Share Posted July 15, 2004 The animal has two white tusks in upper jaw. It is not even funny to suggest a rock can have that! e s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superchump Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 What? Those are individual rocks on either side of it. They don't even look like tusks in themselves. Let me ask you this extrasense....what does this look like to you? http://www.kgs.ukans.edu/Extension/KSplaces/visit6.html Now are you going to blatantly say that that is a giant mushroom? How how 'bout these gems? http://www.allfunpix.com/picspages2/weird_rocks.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 what does this look like to you?Ascribing real attributes to these photos would be a phallusy (sic). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts