After discussing with a.is in several weeks, they finally agreed with me that gravity is independent of mass and eventually proves that core isn't dense like what people think. I will post some parts of it when I am not busy later. 👌. Be prepared because It's quite long.

26 minutes ago, Lan Todak said:

After discussing with a.is in several weeks, they finally agreed with me that gravity is independent of mass and eventually proves that core isn't dense like what people think. I will post some parts of it when I am not busy later. 👌. Be prepared because It's quite long.

It will be moved to the trash, as such content is against the rules.

25 minutes ago, Lan Todak said:

After discussing with a.is in several weeks, they finally agreed with me that gravity is independent of mass and eventually proves that core isn't dense like what people think. I will post some parts of it when I am not busy later. 👌. Be prepared because It's quite long.

Can you continue discussing this with AI by yourself? I'm more interested in what people who study science have to say about these things. We know the AI is more interested in pleasing you than it is using actual science. Even if it was short I wouldn't be interested. "Quite long" is probably a "framework" for obfuscation.

14 hours ago, swansont said:

It will be moved to the trash, as such content is against the rules.

I saw many people post a.i contents here. How is such content against the rules?

14 hours ago, Phi for All said:

Can you continue discussing this with AI by yourself? I'm more interested in what people who study science have to say about these things. We know the AI is more interested in pleasing you than it is using actual science. Even if it was short I wouldn't be interested. "Quite long" is probably a "framework" for obfuscation.

They will please you if you don't filter the contents. You can ask them to be unbiased towards your contents and preferences. They will give you direct answer, clean. Btw, I don't think I will continue 😁.

15 hours ago, Phi for All said:

Can you continue discussing this with AI by yourself? I'm more interested in what people who study science have to say about these things. We know the AI is more interested in pleasing you than it is using actual science. Even if it was short I wouldn't be interested. "Quite long" is probably a "framework" for obfuscation.

Yeah, it will be a "framework" for sure. 😁

I propose to remove the "work" bit from anything speculative coming from AI. It would be just a "frame". That is, the "framework" without the "work".

"I've been given a frame to talk about this" would be at least honest.

2 hours ago, Lan Todak said:

I saw many people post a.i contents here. How is such content against the rules?

Like other sites, we're adapting to the sudden surge in AI generated content. We think it can be used as a LLM for those who can't always put their thoughts down as eloquently as they'd like. Many people, however, use it to draw conclusions, search for evidence, and site their sources, all of which we've proven the AI is incapable of doing honestly.

2 hours ago, Lan Todak said:

They will please you if you don't filter the contents. You can ask them to be unbiased towards your contents and preferences. They will give you direct answer, clean. Btw, I don't think I will continue 😁.

Even this small interaction is much more valuable to me than anything you might do with AI.

I have to admit that I'm heavily biased against AI in general. In the US, preemptive laws are in place that prohibit us from regulating AI companies. I've heard that AI in 2026 will use more water than all the bottled water companies in the US. And it just pisses me off in general since it's obvious the billionaire class hopes AI will eliminate the need to employ actual people. To me, AI is like a fascinating toy that kills people by making them useless.

13 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

AI is like a fascinating toy that kills people by making them useless.

More like 'group think'.
People will never be useless; we are needed to be exploited.
Billionaire owners of these sites are attempting to 'force-feed' us their world view.
( which is everyone is there to work for me and make me more money )

AI is simply the latest institution in a long line, designed so that a privileged few can take advantage of the many.

4 hours ago, Lan Todak said:

I saw many people post a.i contents here.

You should also see lots of moderator notes telling them it’s against the rules, if it was used to make content, and lots of such posts in thevtrash.

4 hours ago, Lan Todak said:

How is such content against the rules?

Read the rules. 2.13, in particular