dimreepr

Just wondering...

Nope, I'm just asking if you know what the number is???

Everyone is part of the problem, even the holier than though; it's a side effect of being alive...

Is that the latin for the number?

So, what's the number?

Is there a number for the value of ethics?

It's more about consequence than competence, I'm fine with tapping the mine of wisdom; but mindful of the fact that they're human and so their personal outlook would be heavily biased towards them existing in the very short term, relatively. And passing down his fiefdom to HIS children, the success of society would be a lucky coincidence.

Is that your last word?

Your quip would be cutting, if the first halve of my post wasn't both accurate and relevant; but since we find ourselves in this half, my objection of the 80+ year olds in political influence, isn't based on competence it's based on the fact that it's not their world, anymore.

My thoughts on Islam is the word prophet, the idea that someone would come along in a different place and time, with the same idea but a different God. When are we going to realise that a good idea is not always a magical snare...

I'm not sure you do, which one of us is content with least?

Whatever floats your boat... The thing is, I'll have to try really hard too care much if I'm not emotionally invested...

Hence the reason I said I wasn't defending him, but I stand by "we all do", because politically we have to align for a definition to have any meaning at all...

The problem is, most of these people think they can remember what it was like, when it was written down... 80+ year olds should NOT!!! have a political opinion, let alone a finger on the trigger...

We've discussed this topic many time's on this site and my position has always been strongly in favour of people being allowed to be who they think they are. What I've learned from the many, many page's of conversation on this and related topics (sport et all) is that repeating the scientific evidence does very little to change the mind of someone who's main argument is the meme "the definition of an expert is, ex is someone who was and spurt is a drip under pressure." The ethics of this discussion is clear for all, it's the politics that should be under scrutiny; my apologies for not being a better satirist. I thought my quip about a craving for ants named steve, was really funny; be a shame if it got me cancelled.

Indeed, that was my point...

I'm not defending Mig, but we all do... Jokes are a way to codify meaning, and explian thing's that the less acidemically inclined fail to see; unfortunately, not everyone gets the joke...

It's a little self indulgent, if you imagine that anyone who disagrees with you just want to annoy you... I really don't care what you think, but it's fun when I think I've won a meaningless game; it's why we have moderator's, they're trying to protect you from yourself...

At some point the alphabet people will have to commit to laughing at themselves, if they want to be accepted. I'm on my third shoe with this joke, it would seem.

That depends on the level of commitment...

Indeed, today I had mushroom soup, and now I have a craving for ant's named stewart...

People are frightened of almost every abstract version of tomorrow that doesn't include their current level subsistence. We'd be better off employing an octopus to lead us. Nothing could be easier than to paint such a picture, if all you want is more; Banksy chose a different path...

That may be true, but if I was a Palestinian I'd choose the rock, bc the hardplace just sucks...

But it is kinda birdlike...

You know what they say about duck's???