Fuzzwood

Because: CH2 cannot be found in photosynthesis. Show evidence where it is detected. Plants do not make formaldehyde. If they do, show the evidence. High-energy photons are able to radicalize certain molecules. Evidence has been provided to you to confirm this for yourself. Why are atmospheric scientists concerned? Perhaps of the scale and that the CO2 levels are gradually increasing? A single molecule does not have any pressure, nor can it feel effects of a vacuum. A (partial) vacuum is simply the (partial) absence of molecules as compared to our atmosphere, no magic or special energies involved. Glucose contains more chemical energy than the composing molecules. Glucose was able to be formed by photosynthesis which requires light energy to be driven (yet another case where light can enable reactions to occur). CO2, nor any other molecule will gain mass. Vacuum is, again, not a form of energy, but simply the absence of molecules. Perhaps 6CH2O is glucose on paper and your dreamworld, not in real life. People have plenty of times explained this to you. It's time for you to either stop your incessant trolling or remove the fingers from your ears.

You don't need friggin CO to make ozone, not water, nor H2, nor CH2 which doesn't even exist like that. There is plenty of oxygen left in the atmospheric sphere you refer to. Also, chemistry, like any other science, doesn't care what you or I think of it. It simply works. Are you a global warming skeptic by any chance?

Have you read the link I supplied? And the oxygen in CO2 DON'T share ANY electrons with each other. The fact that it is written in that fashion is just to make it easier. CO2, in fact, looks like O=C=O. CO on the other hand, can be viewed as ionic with a free electron pair on carbon and another one on oxygen. The oxygen lacks an electron this way, giving it a positive charge, while the carbon in this fashion has a surplus electron, thus giving it a positive charge. CO is still neutral but its composing atoms can be viewed as being ionic. Natural occurence of CO? Whenever a tree has been set on fire by lightning.

O3 forms from the radical reaction between O2 molecules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone Not a single molecule of CO needed.

Mordred, that's called the Dunning_Kruger effect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect So far, I only felt a lot of hot air, and still no shred of evidence.

"And at this moment, no scientist can say I am wrong because they can not show where they know how to convert water into formaldehyde." Can you show that you are right? The burden of proof is in your corner. Analoguously you cannot disprove I hold a herd of unicorns in my garden.

Depends what you want to do with the salt crystal. If you want smaller salt crystals, it goes in a grinder. If you want a solution of ions, you dump it into water. If you want to extract the sodium metal, then yes, you have to melt it and elektrolyze it.

Then you would confirm that you know jack poo about thermodynamics.

They are labels concerning foods that have been grown in specific ways: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_food

And besides, the answer is incomplete. It should be water + energy.

Skin, however, is impermeable to salt solutions as it is part of the skin job description.

Why so difficult? You get 5 N of resistance for each kN of weight (not mass, mass implies a number in grams, weight a number in Newtons). You have 1176000 kN, so that totals to 5 * 1176000 kN = 5880000 N of resistance

Women aren't slaves. Although IS seems to treat them that way.

The very first reaction emphasizes that HCl in water indeed reacts to H3O+ and Cl-, since water at that moment is the strongest base. If, however, a stronger base than water is introduced in the equation, the reaction with water really doesn't matter anymore for the end result. In this case, a water molecule might be used, and another one is produced. Net gain or loss = 0 and thus H2O should not be in the net reaction equation for the reaction between HCl and NaOH. To put it even more elegantly, the only reaction that actually matters is either H+ + OH- --> H2O or H3O+ + OH- --> 2 H2O, whichever suits your fancy. The rest of your equations are non-sensible redox equations and have nothing to do with the initial problem. Except of course for the very last one with which I totally agree.

Yes, on paper it is viable to just switch the ions around. The solution in real life of course doesn't care as you introduced 4 ions into a solution which do not readily precipitate. Ergo, you cannot separate them. And just to throw a random fact about, I believe home-made explosives are considered to be illegal.

Never played the truly original ones, but did play the red alert and tiberian sun series up until tiberian wars. Good times and now you made me feel old ()

Try the supermarket for soda. The normal one, not the caustic. It should come as a white, crystalline powder.

Because acidic and basic are on a scale. While your skin has pH 5.5, 1 mol/L of HCl has a pH of 0 and it really wants to get rid of the proton.

Scientific cannot prove the non-existence of something. Kindly do not mutilate the scientific method with your unscientific opinions.

Also, the molar mass of chloride is 35.45, not the earlier mentioned 17.

It might be possible, but keep in mind that we consume the pre-precursor in plenty quantities and is present in the cellular membrane as a sort of plasticizer: cholesterol. A couple of dehydrogenations and a UV-activated reaction gives you vitamin D.

It is possible, in a way: allow fresh water to pass by saline water separated by a membrane that allows only water to pass through (and no ions), you can create a pressure differential strong enough to power a turbine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_power

Look, that you have the feeling that you somehow have to compensate for something (ie. your male 'competitiveness') is all in your head, ergo your problem.

It could condense from the outside air, but not form. For that you will need free H2 in the air.

Use teflon grease or sleeves.