SergUpstart
Senior Members
Posts
336 
Joined

Last visited

Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by SergUpstart

The idea of the nature of time dilation. Can be checked.
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
At the bottom, the frequency should be at a relative value of 3gH/c^2 more. Hence, delta f/f=delta f/(1+3gH/c^2). If we substitute H=8000m, we get that the clock at the bottom should go to (2.4*10^10)% more accurately. I admit, the effect is impossible to notice practically.The height of mount Everest is clearly not enough. 
The idea of the nature of time dilation. Can be checked.
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
It can not be excluded that the slowing down of time (slowing down the flow of processes) is combined with an increase in frequency, as in the case when the neutron flux moves relative to the observer, see above. We must admit that the experiment is either very long or expensive. If the frequency stability of the atomic line df/f=1E14, then it takes at least 3 years to feel any effect at the frequency of 1 GHz. And for a set of statistics, you need to repeat the observation at least 100 times only at one height. The total is 300 years at one altitude + 300 years at another altitude. Or use the comparison of one source with hundreds of others at the same time for 3 years. 
Although I believe Yanchilin's quantum theory of gravity is correct, I found one POSSIBLE error in It. This error is not fatal to his theory. An erroneous conclusion is that next to with a large mass, the speed of time increases. This means that near a large mass, the rate of decay radioactive elements should be increased, and experiments show the opposite. So don't demand it new experiments, and understand the reason. Considered example. The neutron flies away from the observer at the speed of v, because of the Doppler effect, the length of its de Broglie wave increases, the natural frequency decreases, the decay constant increases according to the formula Now let's consider the same situation, but let the neutron not fly away from the observer, but on the contrary, fly in the direction of the observer. In this case, its de Broglie wavelength will decrease due to the Doppler effect, and its natural frequency will increase, but it is constant the decay rate will still increase according to the above formula. Means Doppler frequency shift and deceleration the time of a moving object is not the same. And the fact is that the photon in addition to its frequency has another important characteristic. This is the natural width of its spectral line, which is inversely proportional to the time of its radiation. And it is this time of photon emission that determines the speed of time flow. What is the speed of time in a physical system? This is the speed of all processes in this system. The atoms and particles that make up the physical system interact with each other through the radiation/absorption of particles that carry the interaction, both real and virtual, mainly photons. The radiation time of these particles is finite, and it determines the speed of all processes in the physical system. The frequencies of these particles, which are equal to f=E/h, do not matter in terms of the speed of physical processes. An analogy with radio engineering is relevant here. In an amplitudemodulated radio signal, the information is carried by its envelope.For this information, the value of the carrier frequency does not matter. Thus, near a large mass, both the time of photon emission and its frequency increase simultaneously. This means that the natural relative width of the spectral line of the emitted photons decreases. And, therefore, clocks that operate as quantum frequency standards should run with GREATER RELATIVE ACCURACY near a large mass. On this effect, we can build an experimental test of this idea. It is necessary to set a couple of clocks at the foot of mount Everest, which they represent a quantum frequency standard, and during sufficient time to determine the standard deviation of their measurement intervals time. Then move them to the top of mount Everest for the same time and again determine the standard deviation, and then compare the reseltates. If the relative accuracy of the movement of the clock at the bottom is higher, then this will be evidence in favor of my version of nature gravitational deceleration of time, so m in favor of the quantum theory of gravity of Yanchilin.

What product is released in a ammonium nitrate explosion?
SergUpstart replied to Legoman2179's topic in Chemistry
This is an oxidizer and reducing agent in one bottle. The NH3 reducing agent HNO3 is the oxidizing agent. But in order for ammonium nitrate to detonate, it must be cleaned of water (it is very hygroscopic) and properly compacted. 
Could General Relativity simply be the "scale" field
SergUpstart replied to Edgard Neuman's topic in Speculations
But decompose into scalar and vector fields according to the Helmholtz theorem? 
Help me solve the differential equation
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Analysis and Calculus
No, I really couldn't solve this equation for a long time and decided to turn to mathematicians. How could I have known that you would solve the equation? I was hoping that the solution would converge to Gm/r^2 in the asymptotic for large r, but not exactly match it. 
Help me solve the differential equation
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Analysis and Calculus
Thank you. Yes, this is the equation for a point mass field, taking into account the mass of the field itself. I used to think the density of the gravitational field was equal ro=g^2/4*Pi*c^2 which led to an incorrect decision. Replacing c^2 with phi led to an equation that I asked for help solving. In him y(x)=phi(r) and a=4*Gm. The solution you found gives Newton's law of gravity phi(r) = 2Gm/r g(r)=(dPhi/dr)/2=Gm/r^2 It turns out that taking into account the mass of the gravitational field itself does not change anything in Newton's law of gravity. 
Is it possible to find an analytical solution to the following differential equation Thank you in advance to those who will respond

Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
But in Our galaxy, you can probably find more than one pair of mainsequence stars, so that they have approximately the same mass, temperature, and speed of rotation around their axis, but that one would be close to the center of the galaxy, and the other close to the edge of the galaxy. That would be a rough measure and compare the strength of their magnetic fields. 
Chinese officials report that a deadly "unknown pneumonia" has broken out in Kazakhstan, with a higher death rate than Covid 19. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article8508129/UnknownpneumoniasaiddeadliercoronavirussweepingKazakhstan.html

Massive Star Has Mysteriously Disappeared
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Science News
More dust ?????? 
Astronomers have witnessed for the first time how a large star in one of the neighboring dwarf galaxies, located in the constellation Aquarius, suddenly disappeared from the sky, presumably directly turning into a black hole. This was announced on Tuesday by the press service of the European southern Observatory (ESO). "Such large stars usually produce bright supernova bursts at the end of their lives, which is why the disappearance of this star has become an extremely unusual event for us. If it really directly turned into a black hole, then we are the first direct witnesses of how the life of a giant star ended in such a manner," said Andrew Allan, an astrophysicist from Trinity College in Dublin (Ireland), whose words are quoted by the ESO press service. https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/scientistssayamassivestarhasmysteriouslydisappeared/5485235.html#:~:text=Astronomers say a massive star,in the constellation of Aquarius.

Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Yanchilin's equations are slightly different from Newton's Newton's Phi (r)=Gm/r g (r) = Gm/r^2 Yanchilin'sPhi(r)=2Gm/r g(r)=(dPhi/dr)/2=Gm/r^2 This reflects the law of conservation of energy. When an Apple accelerates when it falls from a height H, the energy of the Apple changes not by the amount of mgH, but by the amount of 2mgH. Half of that energy to change the kinetic energy mv^2/2, and the other half goes to the change in internal energiei that of Apple, which is Einstein's E=mc^2, and Yanchilin's respectively E=mphi. A photon has a rest mass of 0, so all this energy is used to change the kinetic energy of the photon. 2mgH and not mgH, as in Newton. This explains and corrects the error Of Newton's theory, which predicts the deflection of a ray of light in a gravitational field exactly 2 times less than GRT. How are you going to measure local time and determine when to stop counting decay events? There's no way without a second watch. Have there been experiments with two different clocks? 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Let's go back to the clock experiment. The new theory States that as the gravitational potential increases, Planck's constant decreases, which should REDUCE the rate of radioactive decay. We need an experiment not with one, but with a couple of hours, where one will work on the principle of radioactive decay, and the other as a quantum frequency standard. This pair of hours is set at the top and synced, then we lower the pair of hours down and they will have to be out of sync. 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Yes, you are right, such an experiment will help you find the truth 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Let's say we count 1000 pulses from the Geiger counter. In fact, we form a rectangular pulse, whose front front coincides with the first pulse, and the back  with the 1000th. when transmitting it to an external observer, we will get the same rectangular pulse, the duration of which will be formed by a proportional change in all the frequencies of its spectrum. Nothing will work, we check the gravitational frequency shift. 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
The law of conservation of energy will not be violated, the rest masses of all bodies are also variable and are determined by the gravitational potential. Here I found a link to this theory in English https://vixra.org/pdf/1603.0398v1.pdf It is useless to accumulate impulses, this only narrows the Delta f. With a gravitational shift all frequencies of the spectrum will change by the same relative value 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Yanchilin assumed that the splitting of spectral lines in distant quasars will not change, so the constant of the fine structure does not change. He also showed that the variation of the elementary charge violates the law of conservation of energy. 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Indeed, it is impossible to refute GRT using a formula . But not because the formula is incorrect, but because we can not fundamentally compare the course of the clock at points with different gravitational potential, bypassing GRT. And radioactive decay will not help here, since it is necessary to compare the number of decay events for and the time intervals for which they occurred, and it is impossible to compare these time intervals bypassing GRT. But to conduct this experiment with the measurement of the magnetic constant at different gravitational potentials would still be interesting, not from the point of view of checking GRT, but from the point of view of checking the above formula. In addition, a previously unknown effect can be detected, the dependence of the wave resistance of the vacuum on the gravitational potential 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Yanchilin considered two atoms that are at different heights above ground level, the height difference is equal to H, and emit photons at the same energy transition. the frequency of the photon emitted by the atom at point A (below) is higher by relative value 2gH/c^2 than the frequency of the photon emitted exactly the same atom at point B (above). But while the photon is flying up, its the frequency is lowered by a relative value of 3gH/c^2 . At the same time 2/3 this value (i.e. 2gH/c^2) is caused by a decrease in the photon energy (the energy of a photon decreases twice as fast as the energy of a nonrelativistic body because the photon has no rest energy), and 1/3 of this values (i.e. gH/c^2) caused by an increase in the Planck constant. Thus, the total result of the two effects is that the frequency of the photon emitted by the atom below decreases when it rises to the height H by a relative value of gH/c^2, which coincides with the result predicted by GRO and corresponds to the experimental data. Agree that this explanation is simple, logical, and it is devoid of contradictions that exist in the explanation from the point of view of GR. 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
It follows from the formula that the square of the speed of light is not an invariant, but depends on the gravitational potential. In addition, Yanchilin's theory contradicts GRT. According to GRT, time slows down near massive bodies, but in the Yanchilin's theory, it accelerates on the contrary, although due to the gravitational redshift, the remote observer has the illusion that time slows down near a massive body. It also follows from the formula written above that black holes do not exist, since the speed of light increases in proportion to the square root of the gravitational potential. Light can leave the vicinity of any massive body, but the amount of gravitational redshift is not limited. Theoretically, it is possible that leaving the vicinity of a sufficiently massive body, even gamma radiation can turn even into radio waves of the ultralongwave range 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
I wrote about this award not because I want to get itππ, but because they quite reasonably do not consider gravitational redshift to be proof of time slowing down near a large mass. It can be explained in another way. Moving away from a massive body, a photon with its own mass spends its energy on performing work against the force of gravity and its energy decreases, and therefore its frequency decreases. Their team believes that there is no other way to test the theory other than directly measuring the passage of time at different gravitational potentials using a very accurate atomic clock. I see another method based on a different physical principle. 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
If they had measured not the strength of the magnetic field (which was 400 times weaker than expected) but the magnetic permeability of space, it would not have been a "possible interpretation" but a fait accompli. 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Based on the law of BiotsavardLaplace, the smaller the magnetic constant, the weaker will be the strength of the magnetic field created by a current of the same force. Briefly, the essence of Yanchilin's quantum theory of gravity theory, as it explains the mechanism of gravitational attraction. The square of the speed of light is equal to the gravitational potential with a minus sign Planck's constant and the speed of light are related by the ratio Thus Therefore, the gravitational potential determines not only the speed of light, but also the value of the Planck constant. the greater the absolute value of the gravitational potential, the smaller the value of the Planck constant. This means that at a point with a higher absolute value of the gravitational potential, the quantum uncertainty value is less, and this in turn means that the probability of a particle's transition from a point with a lower gravitational potential is greater than the probability of a particle's transition from a point with a higher gravitational potential to a point with a lower absolute value of the gravitational potential. The Institute of Special Studies (Saint Petersburg, Russia) announced in 2016 that it would pay a prize of 100,000 us dollars to anyone who provides IRREFUTABLE proof that the GRT is correct. The bonus has not yet been paid to anyone and the offer is still valid. 
Experiment verification of General relativity
SergUpstart replied to SergUpstart's topic in Speculations
Unfortunately, I can only give a link to a Russianlanguage source http://www.vixri.com/d/Janchilin V.L. _Kvantovaja teorija gravitacii.pdf