Senior Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Neutral

About druS

  • Rank
  • Birthday 05/19/1962

Profile Information

  • Location
    Sydney Australia
  • Interests
    Science - Inspired by Sean Carrol to attempt to learn the math behind Quantum, and picking up a life long love of biology at the same time.

    Rugby (Union), 4WD
  • College Major/Degree
    Bachelor Building
  • Favorite Area of Science
  • Biography
    From Queensland originally, lived in the UK for 10 years. Represented Britain in the 2007 Skydiving World Cup ("also rans" but fun).
  • Occupation
    Technical Services (Development and Construction)

Recent Profile Visitors

1771 profile views
  1. As someone very very early on this journey and doing it very late - I'd appreciate if you could expand on this. My personal experience is that my curiosities are too broad and defining a study course through my interests, and doing this somewhat efficiently through how quickly I can gain qualifications, well these things are diametrically opposed. I am fascinated by the concept of Masters v PhD. I get the different levels of academic interest/ability but there are always going to be details that sit around this. A M Science should not EVER be sneezed at.
  2. I love this place. Completely unexpected but occasionally something goes "Hell, what happened there? It's something right on the tip of my ability to understand." An issue then to drive study. swansont, thanks. But to be fair, rock on Itoero. If you weren't making noise mate, I'd be missing these opportunities. Love this community, thanks all.
  3. druS

    Exhaling deeply after inhaling something

    I'd approach this more from engineering, or perhaps physics. The average set of lungs holds approx 6l and when you fully breathe out there is a residual approx 1.5l So if you exhale a contaminant mixing inside your lungs there is only 1/4 of it left - at the same concentration so you are still consuming it the same way. Inhale non contaminated air and it has been diluted to 1/4. Note though that the whole time your lungs are consuming whatever it is.
  4. druS

    Rotational motion

    Yes appreciate it.
  5. druS

    Rotational motion

    Yep. Seems my biggest issue was the free body diagram to the falling book. Weird. Not a difficult thing, surely. And yes, puzzling out these things is rewarding.
  6. druS

    Rotational motion

    Thanks again. Yes this final step didnt stress me too much. accel = alpha x R; T = F x R Sigma T = I x Alpha Which ultimately gave me 0.16 kg.m/s which is text consistent. Are there easy and simple introductions to LaTex? Probably dont have time to test it mid trimester but it is goinng to have to happen sooner or later. Thank Studiot.
  7. druS

    Rotational motion

    Cheers guys. Waking up in the middle of the night with a brain spark started by this conversation. Yes I've been visiting and cogitating. Studiot, I suspect our formula are equivalent though I like the accuracy in the way you express things. I'll stick with the formula sheet in our sample exam papers though. Swansont I think I was jumping to the next step in my head, looking for the moment of inertia. not focusing on one issue at a time had me applying Newtons 3rd law incorrectly. Acceleration works to 3.75m.s-2 (matching Studiot's more accurate expression). And going down is negative. For the 3kg hanging book I get a tension force above FT = m.a = 3.0kg x 3.75m/s2 and weight acting down W = m.a = 3.0 x -9.81 AND what I was missing a resulting force FR = m.a = 3kg . 3.75m/s2 [Sum of] Forces = 0 FR = FT + W (the bit I did not have right!) 3 x (-3.75) = FT + 3.00 x (-9.81) providing FT = 18.18 N Then I was wracking my brain with the 2kg book on the (frictionless) table. The only difference is that there is no relevant weight force (normal force and weight cancel to zero in the y direction). (What I had been doing incorrectly for the 3kg book) In the x direction the resultant force simple equals the tension force and we get 7.5N. Which fortunately matches the text answers. OK next step? I'm presuming that the torque applied by these tension forces will not equate to the actual torque observed and the difference will be related to the moment of inertia of the pulley. (but just for now it is 3:20 in the morning and I'm going back to sleep a happy student).
  8. druS

    Rotational motion

    So the second law is F = m.a And I wish I could start there. Let's start with the lower book. So (oh good, the cat decided to join this conversation) x = x o + vo.t + 1/2 at2 I am focused on the lower body, get an acceleration of roughly 5.6m/s2. OK How do I translate this to the tensions.
  9. druS

    Rotational motion

    OK I'll give this forum a go. It is not actually homework, but study that is related and extra. A 2.00kg textbook rests on a frictionless, horizontal surface. A cord attached to the book passes over a pulley whose diameter is 0.150m (my note R = 0.075), to a hanging book with a mass 3.00kg. The system is released from rest and the books are observed to move 1.20m in 0.800s. a) What is the tension in each part of the cord? b) What is the moment of inertia of the pulley about it's rotational axis. This is an end of chapter question Q 10.13 in the global edition of University Physics with modern physics by Young and Freedman. I (think I) can work the basic kinematics on distance and time and capture an acceleration. I haven't managed turning that into the cord tensions. I think I can find an angular acceleration in the pulley which means i should be able to find moment of inertia. But it has not at all worked. Who wants to guide a newb through what must be a pretty basic question?
  10. When I think of "living fossil" my first thought are cycads. Now the cycads alive today are obviously different from the cycads known from the fossil record, BUT there are more species known from fossil than are alive today. Predate flowering plants on earth. Since reading Tim Low's latest ("Where Song Began - Australia's birds and how they changed the world"), I also think of the Australian lyre bird. Not really a living fossil, but certainly a direct descendant of possibly the first song bird. In these discussions we need to reconsider the term "primative" - where it is thought to mean poor and rudimentary. In many ways these species have extraordinary strength in survival.
  11. druS

    When particles collide

    I think this one is easier to cogitate for a beginner by NOT thinking of particles colliding. Try waves instead.
  12. Studio, apologies but I'm busy in study at the moment. Thanks for your insight. As usual, will come back to this as time permits.
  13. Studiot, you'll have to be patient with me. Very. I have a long way to go before I am grappling with this math. I can tell you that I need to work on inequalities. OTOH These conversations are most definitely having an impact on my choices in study. I have a building list of topics I require to be covered that sits actually quite outside the standard study choices. Thanks for this. Dru
  14. Apologies for re-awakening this thread, especially as it is likely to be a short input. My studies have progressed. I understand the relevance of Plack's constant now, though I am a long way from pulling Fourier transform into my mathematical understanding. And I have tested in my education when I will offered the transforms - it will take time. I stand by that last statement. There is a lot of talk of "aha" moments when you choose to study STEM subjects. I'm not talking "aha", I am talking literal beauty. Like Mozart or Rembrandt. God I envy those who do understand it. It will take me years, all I can say is that I am on the journey.
  15. I would have thought that energy of the photon determines whether or not it excites electrons in the element. Not how much it penetrates. Interested in responses here.