Speculations

To those of you that have no life, perhaps will remember me from a couple of years ago. I am the one that has the Galaxy Spin theory that reputes the big bang. I said I would be back, and heeere's Jeffy. "Pack up the babies, and grab the old ladies". Let me be brief: The Galaxy Spin theory is based on two premises 1: The galaxies are in orbit. 2: Gravity bends light. With those two statements all the nonsense of the big bang can be refuted; The magical singularity, dark matter, and dark energy.

Assume O and O' are clocks are in relative motion in the standard configuration. Assume the stationary frame is O. According to SR, when the clock O elapses t, the clock in O' elapses t/γ, thus, when the clock in O elapses tγ, the clock in O elapses t. That is simple time dilation. By the measure at c logic of SR, if light is emitted when O and O' are co-located, light proceeds spherically from the origin of each. This website shows this. http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/sr/paradox.html Now, considering O', when its clock elapses r/c, light proceeds a distance r in all directions. This is the SR measure at c logic. OK, now for the experiment, when th…

My mom sent me this video. Any thoughts? The statements in the video actually seem well sourced (for a change) http://www.vegsource.com/news/2010/03/what-you-ate-as-a-kid-can-give-you-cancer.html Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedupdate: here's a link to a paper that he uses in the vid: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B758G-48FJGY7-2J&_user=30742&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F1996&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000000333&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=30742&md5=a6fe7956eb4e65df182b15e75b7e7579

INHERITANCE MUDRECOV Stonehenge. The mystery of the English system of measures. Another English astronomer 18 th century Herschel (judging by the name - a Jew) suggested that the most practical system of measures must be based on the length POLE Earth's axis, which was calculated by sages in deep antiquity. Then determine the length of the circumference of the earth POLE allowed elementary formula of two Al Pi. Every circle is divided into 360 degrees. Or 21 600 angular minut.Ili 1 296 000 arc seconds. If the polar circle the Earth 39 941 km (according to NASA) to share the above 1 296 000 arc seconds - get 30,8 metra.To is almost exactly 1…

ENGINE FOR UFO. The secret of plasma-jet engines of the 21 st century. A few decades ago at all (especially in Japan) was the development of WATER-JET engines for ships using the Lorentz force and the electrical conductivity of water. Now like all hushed up ... But plasma - ELECTRICAL like water! If you can create a program separate from the engine of the Lorentz force for the ship - then on the same principle, you can create a plasma-jet engine and aircraft! Edakii PLAZMOMETNY engine ... After all, in fact, the flames and hot gases emitted from the nozzle of a jet engine - this is also plazma.Esli on the nozzle of the engine and put the electrodes …

AS most of us know the majority of known matter is comprised of neutrons, electrons, and protrons which are arranged into atoms, which are then usually arranged into molecules. Using nuclear fusion we can smash atoms into each other to create even bigger atoms. Because atoms are comprised mostly of the empty space between the nucleus and the orbiting electrons, a single atom with the same mass of many atoms will always be smaller, because with all of the newer atoms the empty space adds up. Now say when a star explodes, the atoms at the core collape into each other to creat a single super-massive atom with the same mass as the individual atoms that it was originally m…

The aim is to construct a Table of Elements that demonstrates atomic structure. This is done by dividing the electron shells in half and listing the number of electrons in each half. Where there are an odd number of shells the middle shell is divided equally between the inner and outer halves. Elements 1H and 2He are the only single (1s) shell elements; the 1s shell consists of nuclear electrons and therefore not divisible into ‘inner’ and ‘outer’. This causes 1H and 2He to form a separate ‘unconventional’ group being the only group that does not begin with an Alkali metal. The first graph shows all the elements, interpretation is done using an enlargement (second graph…

Why are alternate formalisms to physical phenomena altogether bad? For instance I don't know how to model energy, or energetic interactions. Could you use just a graph really. In terms of chemistry this is more interesting though. Why cant you try some alternate system to describe an atom, or polyatomic systems? Giving conservation laws couldn't I just try to model these interactions as noise on a number line. I mean if its regular or periodic in any way I would think this could yield patterns.

A electric universe theorist nagged me about Einstein's famous mass=energy equivalence equation, arguing that a Italian physicist was first to propose the equation. Has anyone got any information about this topic?

Universe/Time = 1/(∞-1) so what's wrong with this? the implied value of infinity changes over time but as it is equally impossible to count to 3 using 2 quanta as it is to count to 1000 using 999 quanta the actual value remains ∞ in each successive time frame. surely?

Right now some scientists are running simulations of different aspects of the universe on nether computers, whether cells, weather systems, planetary movement, you name it. the biggest limitation in creating a complete simulation of a small-scale universe is processing power. so theoretically if we had infinite (or "just enough" processing power to simulate a universe, we probably could. We could simulate sentient beings that would go through their lives without realizing that they were only ones and zeros in a massive computer. following that, it is possible that we are just a simulation inside a super-massive (or infinite) computer. And if the programming was sound e…

abstract yet another big bang theory. nuff said. proposal the universe is expressed by, or an expression of, pure number: it’s counting upwards from 1, or counting increasingly smaller fractions of 1. or: the universe is an expression of the number count we represent in standard English as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13... all the way through to 10to the power 40960000000000000000000 or whatever number we’d be at now if time was just an upward count from 1, or a downward count from derived from 1 being divided into increasingly finer fractions. the universe is expressing or an expression of the numbers 1 to ∞-1 Universe/Time = 1/(∞-1) …

Could you engineer plants to become solar panels? Maybe it could produce film concentrated with some kind of photosynthetic mechanism. I would think you could then use the energy to produce maybe a yield of something else, perhaps usable hydrogen or what not. I would think that you could make the leaves to be transparent with some kind of a skeleton that could be connected in the form of a leaf with a film of photosynthetic organisms. Then the energy could be chained into some reactions in which hydrogen would get feed into some kind of budding organ that contains it in an accessible form. I don't know but could you model carbon nanotube structures into DNA expressio…

in which case could that mean that there is a transition period between one state of the universe and another, kinda like the framerate on a movie?

I was just wondering if anyone thought the action of virus material and or plasmids could be part of what lead to multicellular life. I know bacterial mats exist, but beyond that nucleated cells seem special in being multicellular. Again I wonder that if early on in evolution the action of viruses and plasmids could have been what fostered an environment for being multicellular. If selection had only brought single celled on so far, maybe reproduction keep it that way. Thus maybe beneficial traits existed in pockets or populations and would have to radiate. I think another example would be that such could have had the advantage of generating bacterial mats, …

let's assume that either dark matter or something like that existed, and that it repels the matter that we are made up of (think opposite of magnets: instead of North repels North/South attracts north, matter attracts matter and antimatter repels matter) assuming that we could obtain antimatter could we possibly stuff an amount of antimatter into a ship or something that is equal to the mass of the ship and it's contents, therefore making it have a total mass that is negligible? that would mean that this ship would be able to leave the earth's gravitational field with only air resistance. however, the antimatter would also repel the ship and it's cargo, either making…

Okay, I may sound like a broken record but the 2012 "end of the world" doomsday. Follow me here. In basic terms, time repeats itself. In a theory of time every moment in time must eventually repeat itself. So, hypothetically, the big bang can be explained as a human event. Look at the LHC (i believe that is what it is called) that is soon to create a synthetic "big bang". Well, if this theory of time is true, then I believe that the big bang was created in a lab and we are stuck in an infinite loop. Every time the big bang is created it starts the line over, not like time travel, but rather following time laws of massive events repeating themselves. That would exp…

Dear SFN Member: I am not a physicist, but am a theoretical thinker. I am looking to publish a book and would like to include other theory and commentaries related to the core topic. It is an essay on Relative Gravity. In looking at Kepler, Newton, Einstein and even Faraday, although their thinking was for their particular context, they shared symmetry in principles. For example, a circle with respect to a wheel. This symmetry is exploited in the essay that I wrote as abstract properties: Relative Gravity is the potential energy of bodies purported as amplitude in kinetic energy and expressed in the form of a resonant frequency between them. The resonant…

http://sites.google.com/site/coriolislife/ Warnings: It's a very long read, but then again it's trying to unify biology, biochemistry, psychology, neuroscience, anthropology, physiognomy, etc. It gives no citations to science journals. For some supplementary evidence, I give you the twirling motion of vines: And to really see how matter travels to "converging point" and "tail", I give you hurricanes in motion: When you watch this, imagine that each of those hurricanes is the formation of a leaf or human ear. I've been taught that Mendelian genetics dictates whether the human earlobe is attached or free. But this theory is a simpler, more elegant explanat…

http://preview1.awardspace.com/nico7004.com/fielde.htm Sorry for link only,TEX and HTML are not supported here.

Casimir effect varies time supporting Lorentzian Ether Theory By froarty Numerous claims of anomalous heat between atomic hydrogen and catalysts support the “relativistic” hydrogen theory [1]of Jan Naudts. Naudts theory resolved the controversy regarding fractional hydrogen but introduced “relativistic” hydrogen inside a stationary reactor! This is not hydrogen accelerated through space to luminal velocities; this concept requires “equivalent motion” between time and space but unlike the slowing of time by a gravitational mass associated with normal equivalence, this solution accelerates time. When defects or cavities occur in a conductive mass meeting Casimir geomet…

would i publish 6 pages on a website when I can write a book make millions and enlighten everybody in time.......

Individuality is becoming ever more a rarer and rarer thing. Individuals are now frowned upon by society at large. Is this a new stage of evolution, in which humans are in the early stages developing a collective consciousness? More and more people are conforming to "normality",-definition of normality being- adhering to a standard, pattern. Is this the start of the abolishment of the individual? People dressing the same, behaving the same, eating the same foods, engaging in the same activities, (I shan't give examples as I'm sure each of us can think of many) at what point can it be said that they think the same, that they think...collectively? Nowada…

I am writing a book that will hopefully explain everything. I need your help though....What would you like to see in this book? No this is not a joke, please be serious.

Hi all, I'm new here - I'm an 18 year old guy from Liverpool, UK. I've no formal qualification in science but a double A in science at GCSE level. Overall, I have 10 GCSE's (Above B) and 2 A-Levels. I never really wanted to go to university. That said, I have maintained and fostered an obscene extra-curricular interest in the field of science, technology and philosophy. I could write you an OS ideal to your psychology - but that would be a bit extreme, eh? I'm no academic, quite the opposite, I'm drawn to practical solutions and activity. Simotaniously though, I'm more a theorist and speculative. I like to actively improve things. Probably not one day an inspirar…