Speculations

I simply have to throw this out, not as a solution; only conjecture. And any proof that I'm wrong is humbling, not devestating. I can live with that, but to simply tell me I'm wrong by your use of terminology and math beyond my grasp, is (B.S.) Someone bring this back in laymans terms and you have made a friend. If not, watch, listen and perhaps even you may learn something. By the way, I believe our magnetic universe, was infinately designed, long before the first "Big Bang".

Photon and anti-photon concepts are discussed on the main stream physics. But it have not been discussed that photon disappearing after colliding with other particles. To describe this phenomena we introduce new concept "primal mass". Photon has +1/2(E/C2) and anti-photon has -1/2(E/C2). When photons collide with other particles, photon and anti-photon are annihilated together, and make energy. Using this concept we can explain next photon problems. 1) Photon and anti-photon concept. 2) Photon disappearing after colliding with other particles. 3) Photon mass , i.e., everyone state that "why photon has no mass?". Particle and massless problem.

B46E97R: Is this a case file for longitudinal wave energy degradation into Cherenkov Radiation? Henri

What would happen if you sent a chain of nukes into the middle of a black hole and exploded them in a manner of frequency? Do you think it'd cause some pretty cool waves? Think we could slap them together and get her to spit out some mass like an atom ejecting a photon?

I used graphical analysis to described referenced time. The formulas create a relationship between the observer and the observed. I used them to describe several elements of observation with an experiment at the end to determine if the analysis is valid. http://www.fileswap.com/dl/xWHSeD9A/Time.odt.html

I am going to try this again. The first postulate of relativity requires that all physical laws must be the same in all inertial reference frames. The second postulate follows directly from the first and requires that the speed of light must be the same in all reference frames. Instead of using this drawing for X=0 to derive a transformation: We will instead use this drawing, and derive a general equation for all of 3-space. (note: Z co-ordinate is not shown here. The end equation is only x dependent.) Solve for X=0, you get the same result. However, substitute for t^2C^2 = x^2+y^2+z^2 and you get, Drop the Z co-ordinate …

Okay I'm not an expert in this area, I have no college degree's yet. I'm not a genius. But I have a theory. I have been interested in human evolution and I have always been fascinated by our history.......The human time line to my understanding would be about 7 millions years or more (to the best of my understanding). During this span of time there has been about 15 different species of human beings. Looking back through our history of human evolution we have seen dramatic changes in our DNA, from sahelanthropus tchadensis to homo neanderthal. So what I'm getting at is has anyone ever theorized what type of human species is next to evolve? Are we evolving into somet…

I've probably misunderstood something, so if you could help me understand I would appreciate it. If time is relative, how can we actually say how old the universe is? It may be 13.7 billion years old for us, but couldn't it be different somewhere else? These are the questions that haunt me

I have a good reason to show how being consciouslly aware of reality maybe possible even after we are apparently died: First of all what makes you, you? 1. A certain configuration of atoms 2. A brain created by this configuration of atoms 3. A certain place in space & time Now this would suggest you could only live once because exact copies in terms of atomic configurations to you if they existed would not be you because they are seperate in space & time. But if this is true, then when you move true time you are not you anymore and if you move through space then you don't exist anymore, but that it is not true, because when I move from point A to…

In the standard rubber-sheet analogy, a 'gravity hyper-force' pulls down on matter placed upon the rubber-sheet, which represents the fabric of spacetime. When multiple masses near each other, that 'gravity hyper-force' draws those masses together, since, when combined, the resulting larger mass sags down deeper, deeper down into the 'gravity hyper-force potential' (as it were). This qualitatively describes the 'like attracts like' effects of gravity interactions. Q: Is it legitimate, to try to extend GR, to EM-like interactions (like repels like, opposites attract), by 'reversing' the 'direction' of the 'hyper-force', from the amplifying & exaggerating gravity-…

I cannot comprehend how I just exist, like I know where my biology came from, but I within, my conscious awareness of reality seemed to come from nowhere, like a certain state creates a living thing but what defined that one of them would be me? Why am I experiencing this body? why am I experiencing at all? I know my body creates my experience but whose to say that another body couldn't have produced by consciousness? I know its hard to understand, but I just cannot comprehend how one can experience the world around them, while complete seperate beings experience a completely different perspective of the world. The idea that my brain just created by consciousness is t…

I was just thinking, maybe time doesn't merely exist but there is only the present that exists, and yet through space & motion objects can continuously alter & change this one moment feels eternal and yet because we can change it thanks to space & motion we get an illusion that there is a sense of flowing time. Time travel to the future is just speeding up your motion through space. But if you wanted to return to 2010, you can still somewhat do it, for 2010 was just a certain configuration of matter in space, and not an actual time so if you reconstructed the way everything was in 2010 down to the atomic scale, that would be the best way to time travel and…

"Because Einstein said so?"! As much as I respect his genius, we succumb to a trap of servitude at his behest. There are many great minds out there today who agree and disagree with Dr. Einstein. But who is right? Few want to move from the status quo, so remain ignorant of their own potential and genius because of this rigidity, leaving a possible earth shattering expertise in limbo. Just a question though? Do manifolds and tensors actually apply to "Time and Space Dilation"? If so, would someone please explain them to me: as to Why and How?

Reaction to anecdotes of transcendent episodes range from dismissive characterizations as psychotic events to conviction that they are authentic testaments to a direct experience with God- the professional skeptics which include the science orthodoxy favoring the first view with experiencers (which includes some scientists) convinced of the latter. The advent of theoretical quantum physics has created an ontology by which such events are considered in scientific discussion particularly in regards to the fields of quantum mind and consciousness. Some years ago I experienced what can fairly be described as a classical transcendent episode (spontaneously triggered by…

I link to a post made by Athene http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/54316-athenes-discovery-c-h-f/ I have to say I was inspired to finally make my move after listening to this. After about seven years I developed a system of unification whose new system of physical analysis was based on the equation x=d/d(t). That all things can be physically be described as the evolution of a system(displacement) with respect to time frame. In that post Athene correctly identifies people as a base component in the universe and things such as neurons are in fact part of unification. This is something I have never seen before as this movie hits just about every taboo note in physics whi…

A different look at the big bang theory Part 1-The environment time clock (E.T.C) 1. In the beginning, before the universe came into beingthere was an object. How big it was, how small it was, nobody can tell becauseapart from that object there was nobody,no space, no time, no other object, there was nothing to measure it with oragainst it.Without any space beyond it,how can we say whether it was round orsquare or any shape,the best we can say it could be a singularity. 2. Withinthis object, time started moving and simultaneously the Big Bang also started,Initially time moved slowly and gradually picked up speed which it has beendoing till now. The Big…

I've recently found that after Bohr model there was introduced by Gryzinski classical model in which electrons make almost radial free-fall trajectory to the nucleus, which due to magnetic moments is bent by Lorentz force and so the electron goes back to the initial distance. This model is a natural consequence of classical scattering theory developed by the author. In almost 20 peer-reviewed papers in the best journals he claims to show that these using just Coulomb and Lorentz force models give really good agreement with experiment (in opposite to Bohr). These conceptually simple calculations were verified and approved by many world class reviewers, so one could t…

In The End by: Mark Beal fision vacuum energy canceled a denial of time for a few as the mass distance waves race by the death, an electro magnetic ripple a little distubance we call light so you can gaze at the past with you eyes you can imagine it and remember the future in your mind reach out and feel the present before it slips by we are all experiencing the present here in the back waters of time we are walking into the future and can you feel the breeze on your face chivers down my spine waiting just waiting to stand still just like the light

if a photon leaves a star 27 or so billion light years away heading for earth einstien says that photon is coming for you at 1c Hubbel says the photon is moving away from you at 1c who wins?

ti Sorry pressed the enter key to early not good at this posting stuff yet. Ok so I had this random dream the other night about the possibility of levitation and I had this crazy unrelated thought if we understand how gravity pulls at us is there any way to repell it like the way 2 magnets repel each other. I'm no idiot but obviously no genius just wanted to bounce the idea around and get pointed in the direction of where to get real scientific information on the topic.

my limited experience with relativity. tells me a photon crossing the the universe travels 0 distance in no time at all due to time dilation and length contraction. if that is the case, how can a photon have frequency? sorry about the thread header i've been drinking

As an example let us consider an event involving 2 particles A and B, moving away from a point or planet P, perhaps after an explosion. Let us consider it from the perspective of A moving relative to P, from which we observe that B is also moving away from P. The notion of “universal time” suggests the idea that if time were to be “reversed”, then every process involving time would be reversed. A would move back toward P, as would B, and they would do so consistently along a single “time line”. However, we know that universal time is not real, and that time is in fact relative. The aspect of that which is important in this example is that time according to A is no…

Infinite Theory By: Mark Beal Please read slowly. The words are compressed for maximum efficiency Mass is time and distance present. It moves into time distance future, leaving time distance past behind. Our galaxie is (in large part) an expanding past time;time wave distortion bubble. This time wave distortion bubble is expanding amidst a static, infinite field of pre-present, and pre-history energy and distance, probably rich in gravity in a thin and stretched state. This gravity leaks in amidst a cosmologicaly intense electro-static energy storm, coupled with the surge wave suface tension at the event horizon. The event horizon is chaotic and not …

Could the flow of time be an illusion? the question is, do we travel from the present to the future or does the future come to us? either way in which time flows, there is a problem: the present is always the present, yet we are always travelling from the present to the future. (paradox) I think the resolution to such a paradox is looking at is as this: 00:01am = Past at 00:02am 00:01am = Present at 00:01am 00:01am = Future at 00:00am so a single time can be the past, present or future depending on what time it is now, yet now is always now and so how can the relativity between now, the past & future even change in the first place? what causes the fl…

My big bang theory will be hard to understand but i will tell you anyway the theory is that; from nothing we can create something by using vibrations, heat, cold and static if you have an unlimited amount of space, you can almost do anything (even if there is nothing to use) what i am trying to say is that you can use the expansion of nothing to create small vibrations everything is made of vibrations: inside the atom we see protons, neutrons and electrons but what we don't see is whats inside a neutron or a proton... a proton is actually made up of small bands of vibrations someone once said that all things are always moving (or vibrating) back t…