Jump to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. This is also a pure thought. We know that nuclear energy has many usage. But, it seems that no one had ever think of this one. What about if we use nuclear energy to launch rocket and space shuttle? The nuclear energy can be installed at the launchpad (of course need strict control) or directly at the rocket itself. A strong withstand object like concrete walls(may have up to several kilometers thickness) must be installed to diverge certain amount of force exerted by the nuclear power or recycle the waste products. Since we have technology to slow down the movement of neutron with control rods in nuclear power station, I think we can indeed use the same idea to launch ro…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 7 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 1 follower
  2. Started by Nicholas Kang,

    We know that space is not only a mere vast vacuum. Interstellar Medium (ISM) is scattered all over the universe. Scientist always wonder how can extrasolar space travel can become possible. Now, let me post a simple question: Is it possible to use the matter (interstellar dust and plasma) or energy (maybe cosmic ray or constant radiation) to power our probes, especially cosmic ray and high energy radiation? If we have an energy magnifier, we can magnify the radiation and boost a lot of energy to power the probe, since we know cosmic rays are harmful to human bodies, there should be a good side to cosmic rays if we master the skills to use handle them well, shouldn`t it? E…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 1 follower
  3. For long scientists are looking into some economical ways to send unmanned probes to explore the extrasolar space. Now, I think this idea is a good one. Here is my proposal. First, set up a probe by usual methods and procedures just excluding the power supply unit. Next, design the power supply unit. This power supply unit is something new. It is a long but slim system. You have to stock up a certain amount of fuel, let`s say ion or xenon ion which is used by the Japanese probe Hayabusa(if I am not mistaken). The xenon ion is stored in a container or tank. Then, prepare a long pipe with 2 generators or dynamos. The size of the generator or dynamos depend on the size o…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.3k views
  4. Started by sunshaker,

    Did/Do we create ourselves/universe, Do we live within one of these collisions Or a future collision from next stage collider? Cern Hadron Collider The beams travel in opposite directions in separate beam pipes – two tubes kept at ultrahigh vacuum 10-6 mbar,. They are guided around the accelerator ring by a strong magnetic field maintained by superconducting electromagnets chilling magnets to 1.9k/-271.3 degrees c. Magnets create the magnetic fields in our universe, We create the vacuum of "space/particle collectors", We cool space, We supply the energy needed to create "big bang" by accelerating particles, supplying energy to particles/"electrons".

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
  5. I am going to discuss something about space in this topic. Where does the universe came about? What causes Big Bang? I think we might have found out the answer. It all lies in a brand new theory (more precisely just a hypothesis) -The Theory of Space. The Theory of Space 1. Space is everything. Nothing is outside space. 2. Space creates universe. No matter what theory might be proposed in the future, they must have relationship or originated from space itself. 3. Space is an ultimate invisible super large field, containing a vast amount of gravitions or gravitational field lines. 4. The 4 fundamental forces we know today are actually part of the gravitational …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 8 replies
    • 1.8k views
  6. I myself like others have a look of a girl that is highly, attractive, when looks like the look that is. What in the brain does makes you attracted to this certain almost percise look?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 48 replies
    • 5.8k views
    • 2 followers
  7. Started by pokie,

    Hi, everyone. Humbly, I admit I'm not smart enough to build a time machine. I'm also not smart enough to acquire the resources - cash - to hire some of you bright folks to create a time machine for me. (Sigh. Emphasis added.) But I want a time machine. With that in mind, I can only add what I can add and perhaps indirectly inspire one of you in the quest. Everything has a natural frequency. Would it be possible to travel in time if one were to somehow disrupt the natural frequency of the universe? Could a person somehow encapsulate oneself, perhaps in a shield of energy, disrupt the natural frequency of the universe and perhaps by using certain oscillations of th…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 17 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 1 follower
  8. Hi i am going to unite the 4 forces today and im going to start by explaining 3. I think that protons and neutrons are miniature universes which do big bangs and big crunches. Which means that the strong force is gravity and the weak force is caused by the big bangs of these wave particle duality universes. Now, with this said its time to incorperate the electromagnetic force into the theory by postulating a new theory on gravity. It is that gravity is caused by dark energy which is released from stars during nuclear fusion. And after that it makes gravity stronger which is why a core of a star shrinks over time. Also, this explains why universal expansion accelerates ove…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 146 replies
    • 12.9k views
    • 1 follower
  9. Started by `hýsøŕ,

    I found a video of one of the newer criticisms of the BICEP2 project and they sounded quite.. radical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC_KkLvG22A#t=855 the guy says that both gravitational waves and the CMB simply do not exist... im guessing a quack but im not sure :S

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 1.9k views
  10. Started by petrushka.googol,

    I have made some earlier posts on entropy on this site but I find this aspect of physics very daunting and a tad intimidating (if i could put it that way). How could we interpret entropy to :- a)Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle b)Success and Failure in everyday life (and migraine headaches as an extension...!!) Here's how : Think of an imaginary measuring tool that iteratively scans a sub-space for a photon. As we zero in on the co-ordinates of an elusive photon, we require more iterative sub-space scans (much like the scanning lines on a TV). Programmatically it is like a loop from 1 to N where N is very large (to increase accuracy of measuremen…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 921 views
  11. Started by ADVANCE,

    Hi, I am 18 and although I know a lot about physics and stuff I am probably missing lots of knowledge and probably even simple things in physics. My idea from what I know follows physics and I think it could work maybe, I first realized it when I was 14 and still I have no proof it can't be made/work, and am obviously then wishing for it to be studied and built by the people that could test and make it. So here is my whole plan below, with I know some extreme possibilities if the beginning works, and then those extremer things might work. So here it is below... (it's a saved paste of everything) So could we under a Ultra-High-Vacuum Atomic-Force-Microscope (UHV AFM) o…

  12. Was told to make this separate thread

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 19 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 1 follower
  13. Before I start check out this Physicist's Research: Fran De Aquino Maranhao State University, Physics Department, S.Luis/MA, Brazil. Copyright © 2011 by Fran De Aquino. All Rights Reserved High-power ELF radiation generated by modulated HF heating of the ionosphere can cause Earthquakes, Cyclones and localized heating http://vixra.org/pdf/1202.0044v1.pdf I would like to produce some findings here regarding HAARP, which relate to other HAARP like facilities that may interest you. First off HAARP can generate HF, VLF and ELF frequencies triggered by a phased array which lifts up the ionosphere from 3.6 Mega Watts too 5.1 Giga Watts. That being said, cou…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 19 replies
    • 3.6k views
    • 1 follower
  14. A few things to clarify before I get started: I am aware this is a theory I came up with, which is untested and has no mathematics behind it. I don't claim to be the only one to have thought of it either, although I never saw it discussed anywhere else and concluded it's an obscure concept. Even if my observation holds some truth to it, it's likely incomplete and not fully correct... but it might at least provide a basis for a new way of looking at the subject. I'm hoping that posting this will spark further ideas that will continue mine, and that someone who has the hardware to attempt experiments in this sense might do so as well. In essence, I believe I found part …

  15. Started by Popcorn Sutton,

    I think that gravity is extremely cold, possibly even 0 K. In a place that is as cold as absolute 0, there will be no time and no space for anything. You get can extremely close to it, but it will take you an extremely long time to get there. With this hypothesis, given the assumption that it is 0 K, we can explain why things are solid, I'd call it quantum gravitational freezing, or bubbleic solidification.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 27 replies
    • 3.4k views
    • 1 follower
  16. Started by Farsight,

    Whoa, guys. Time travel is science fiction. It's pseudoscience. I'm afraid you can't even travel forwards in time. People say things like "we all travel forward in time at one second per second". But it's just a figure of speech. This travel is notional, it isn't travel in any real sense. There's no motion through time, none whatsoever. Because time is a cumulative measure of motion through space. Look inside a mechanical clock, and you don't see time flowing. You see cogs and sprockets whirring. Because clocks clock up motion. Every measure of time employs motion, be it the motion of the earth, the motion of a pendulum, the motion of a crystal, or the motion of lig…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 25 replies
    • 5k views
  17. "SCHIZOPHRENIA" (an integration disorder) - the price we pay for language? Professor Tim Crow's theory suggests that schizophrenia is the price we pay for language and I wonder if the exposure to stimulus (non-verbal) - stimulus (verbal) contingencies (classical conditioning) when you with a short delay are able to restore a verbal message or interpret what subjectively seems to be a verbal message can have such a profound effect that some people develop a mental illness. Quote:"...classical conditioning is far more subtle and relevant to complex human cognitive-emotional behavior than one might first realize..." (p. 4) Source: The Imbalanced Brain: From Nor…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 10 replies
    • 2.2k views
  18. Started by Mr Rayon,

    Hi, Is it true that wearing working clothes for work enhances worker productivity (e.g. wearing a suit and tie at work)? Similarly, it is believed by many that wearing fitness gear (gym-wear) enhances your motivation when going to the gym for a workout. I am just wondering whether there have been any studies which have suggested that wearing a particular clothing can make you more productive at doing certain things.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 13 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 2 followers
  19. Started by Dekan,

    There's no such thing as "Space"! It's just a synonym for "Separation" or "Gap". So when earnest scientific posters keep talking about "the expansion of Space" - they could just as well be talking about "the expansion of Gap" Isn't it disappointing to see how easily language stops clear thinking?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.1k views
  20. Started by Popcorn Sutton,

    Traveling faster than speed of light may not be possible, but it is possible with respect to an observer. Imagine freezing yourself in a bubble of absolute zero. For you, no time passes. So wrt to observation and the speed of light, it takes the light about 8 minutes to get here when it could only take you 1 second. That is technically traveling faster than the speed of light. Duh, right? This, combined with statistics, makes time travel possible. And teleportation if you can preserve yourself during the process. Here's a new law for u guys- Nothing can travel faster than t while t = 0(o). t = time with respect to the observer. In this case it equals…

  21. Started by Popcorn Sutton,

    I was thinking about how cool it would be to have a single music station that reflects your input, but then I was wondering if it already exists- Pandora shuffle If it doesn't exist, then computational linguistics could help make it happen. I may get into code if I end up thinking about this often.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 621 views
    • 1 follower
  22. You might have seen my Unexplained Files documentary on the Science Channel last year. I also had an article made about me on Huffington Post. It was a very harrowing experience, and I think that this is something that needs to be explored more. From my experience some things are certain ; Enzymes do not denature at high temperatures while they are inside the body. My doctor even agreed with me on this, saying if that were the case then it would not have gone so far as to causing an internal flame which became visible on the outside of my body. The doctor had diagnosed me with ''Partial Spontaneous Combustion'', and told me that I had burnt from the inside out, com…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 7.6k views
  23. Started by Moontanman,

    I like a British TV program called "Primeval" in this show rifts in time allow animals from various eras to invade the present. In this show usually only one or two animals come through and are dealt with in various ways. The animals from the past are generally shown to be too dangerous for modern animals to deal with them but I wonder if that is true. During the time of the dinosaurs there were no modern type Mammals and the mammals that were alive were easily dominated by dinosaurs. If the two ecosystems were truly mixed in some way would Mammals beat out the dinosaurs or would dinosaurs reclaim their dominance? I think dinosaurs would be at a big dis…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 69 replies
    • 18.6k views
    • 3 followers
  24. Started by sunshaker,

    Below is our star the sun, Also a human egg with sperm. I was wondering if a human egg was enlarged to the size of our sun, How would the egg look to us viewed from earth? Would we see it at its atomic structure? If i changed their colour in photoshop, could you tell difference at first glance? I am not saying our sun is an egg, just how similar they look.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 8 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 1 follower
  25. Started by dijinj,

    Here is non-mass expulsion type device, which uses properties of line integral and path dependent nature of friction force. The new device can achieve near light speed using properties inherent to relativity. In cases like LHC while particle moves at light speed the force is applied from stationary. But in new device force applied from and space craft is in same inertial frame, so comparatively less energy is required to attain light speed. Details of new device are given in link https://sites.google.com/site/nonmassexpulsiontypethruster/ Please comment your views on feasibility of the above concept for a Path independent force or conservative force work done in a c…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 103 replies
    • 10.7k views
    • 3 followers

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.