Jump to content

Jack hammers and their noise.


Recommended Posts

Why do jackhammers and all other percussive drills make noise despite having a shock absorbing system? Why can't we design a structure that can get rid of the noise?

we can use, may in some ways, the conservation of energy law to make use of the sound energy and in turn gain more efficiency in the drilling process.

 

There's construction work going on in my neighborhood. Hence, this discussion.

 

king-jackhammer-patent.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The energy lost to sound is negligable in a jackhammer and inherent in the mechanics.

 

Muffler arrangements do exist, but they simply absorb the sound, they do not and cannot prevent it.

Having said that some hammers are noisier than others.

Edited by studiot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much of the noise comes from the hammer itself and how much comes from the repeated impact it makes with the solid ground? Smash a flat shovel on the ground over and over and it will make a loud noise, and this is true no matter how well designed the shovel. Likewise with a framing hammer hitting a nail...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most noise comes from the air exhaust and could certainly be reduced. You get an idea of the percussion noise by hearing a hand-held hammer drill (remembering the size ratio) or by hearing distinctly both noises.

Could the percussion noise be reduced too? Not so much if the tool must break hard material like concrete, for which peak force is paramount. In a first approximation, the shock of the piston on the hammer must be as hard as the target material. But with an adjustment, less hard parts would be used for asphalt.

In countries where jackhammers were recognized as harmful for the workers, disc saws replace jackhammers on most occasions, especially to open asphalt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

This ties in a bit with my thread on piezoelectricity and roads, perhaps piezoelectric crystals could be used as shock absorbers, helping to dampen the noise and recover some of that (even if only slight) energy loss. I'm guessing this has been thought off and overlooked due to cost/benefit ratios though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if there is inefficiency in the recoil that could be used to generate current. Waste energy as noise is one of those inefficiencis, shock absorbed to the operators arms, not directed back to impact for breaking is another.

 

I know there is no such thing as perpetual motion machines, but there are maximum efficiency machines.

 

So why not transfer that ease energy to a more useful form and at the same time reduce noise and impact on the operator?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.