Science Forums: Wikipedia blacked out for 24hrs - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Wikipedia blacked out for 24hrs Rate Topic: -----

#21 Suxamethonium 


Baryon

View PostJohn Cuthber, on 22 January 2012 - 01:11 PM, said:

Ok, so people found work rounds.
So what?
The point wasn't to stop people using WIKI, it was to make them think about the silly legislation.
If they really wanted to close it down they could just switch off the servers.
How much use would disabling scripts be then?


My point was so that all the people put out by it could know for next time. I use wiki for quick varification of info on the fly rather than shifting through google sites and papers trying to find what is probably 'assumed' anyway- so I understand how much quicker using a work around can be compared to searching the literature and thought I would share for others that MAY be interested.

As for the political stance, analoguous bills haven't passed before- why should they pass now anyway? I'ld take it they just wanted to hype it up a bit- probably made the news, it made facebook... nothing like a bit of free publicity. And if the point wasn't to stop people using wiki- then why didn't they have a link so once you were inconvienced by the add you could move on to required information? They stated their point was to block out the information for a day in protest (bla bla bla politics, sopa etc)- not close the site down and if you turned off the server there wouldn't be an ad to alert us to 'it's sopa fault' in the first place. I really don't understand where your argument lies.


Edit: Immortal- It worked in firefox. Dunno bout IE might be a bit tempremental? Haven't used it in ages.

This post has been edited by Suxamethonium: 25 January 2012 - 01:39 AM

0

#22 Cap'n Refsmmat 


Icon
Mr. Wizard

View PostSuxamethonium, on 22 January 2012 - 09:59 AM, said:

My first thought would be that major companies would host sites overseas to escape the legislation? If this is insufficient some big companies may even shift ownership to another country??

The whole point of SOPA is to target overseas websites which sell counterfeit products or illicit movies. It achieves that by cutting off their sources of funding. If you want to host overseas, you also have to use an overseas payment processor and advertising agency.
Cap'n Refsmmat
SFN Administrator

Get in the chatroom!
0

#23 Suxamethonium 


Baryon

View PostCap, on 25 January 2012 - 02:15 AM, said:

The whole point of SOPA is to target overseas websites which sell counterfeit products or illicit movies. It achieves that by cutting off their sources of funding. If you want to host overseas, you also have to use an overseas payment processor and advertising agency.


I would assume, it only seeks to elliminate funding from or through America? To me that implies that America, once again, seems to feel that the world somehow centralises around them. To be honest, I always thought the biggest buyer in pirate copies and such were countries of the European continent (this is pure conjecture- just the impression that I got growing up).
0

#24 imatfaal 


Icon
Primate

View PostSuxamethonium, on 25 January 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:

I would assume, it only seeks to elliminate funding from or through America? To me that implies that America, once again, seems to feel that the world somehow centralises around them. To be honest, I always thought the biggest buyer in pirate copies and such were countries of the European continent (this is pure conjecture- just the impression that I got growing up).


A large amount of the revenues that on line companies will receive, whether through googleads etc. paypal and creditcard transactions, US$ payments will have to be routed to an extent via a US based company (even if it seems that the deal is completely outside USA). The practical worry (apart from the obvious ones...) from those outside the USA about SOPA was that eg. a UK website (based and catering for UK residents) could be effectively closed by the actions of a US court with no prior representation or notice. I think one bit of fallout from SOPA will be the establishment of non-US based parallel revenue streams/routing to avoid this being a problem again.
A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.

- Alexander Pope
feel free to click the green [+] ---->
0

#25 Suxamethonium 


Baryon
Ah ok, makes a bit more sense. But I still feel that if the bill passed there would be adequate international companies to find work arounds... From the seemingly legitimate companies put out by it, it sounds like its just going to stuff up the american economy even more. O.o Haha- I hate politics...
1

#26 John Cuthber 


Icon
Chemistry Expert
This story gets sillier each time I look.
http://blog.hubze.co...copyright-laws/

Incidentally,
The Dollar is not the only unit of currency in the world.
It is not even the biggest: the euros are worth more than the dollars.
What's this signature thingy then? Did you know Santa only brings presents to people who click the + sign? -->
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users