Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

please help me: how can this cycle work ?


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 ali_baba

ali_baba

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 12 May 2017 - 06:26 PM

please help me: how can this wheel work ? or is Trick ?

link removed per rules

very thank's
BR


Edited by imatfaal, 12 May 2017 - 07:34 PM.
by moderator

  • 0

#2 imatfaal

imatfaal

    lazy do-nothing mudslinger

  • Moderators
  • 7,586 posts
  • LocationSt James's Park

Posted 12 May 2017 - 07:36 PM

!

Moderator Note

Link in your removed per the rules. 

 

Please post basis of discussion here - the rules are explicit that members should not be forced offsite in order to participate in debate.


  • 1

A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.

- Alexander Pope

 

feel free to click the green arrow  ---->

 


#3 ali_baba

ali_baba

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 14 May 2017 - 04:46 AM

hello . please see Pics

Untitfgled.png

...........................

Untitlasasased.png

.......................................

Untitlereted.png

 

this can work ? or no ?


Description of the invention concept  

A strong magnet set in the open slot between sides of the wheel attracts an iron ball.

The magnet is supposed to draw the ball to one side of the center to make the wheel permanently unbalanced.

It is important to note that the static potential energy of the magnetic force is converted into pure kinetic energy.

 

Theoretical study of the perpetual wheel

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_M

We assume that the ball rolls and slips on the inner track of the wheel.

The various inventoried losses of this motor are :

  • Rolling friction losses ( Rrf ) of the ball on the inner track of the wheel and resulting from local deformation of the raceway under the weight of the ball,
  • Power losses due to sliding of the contact surfaces of the ball and raceway (ω' is greater than ω),
  • Loss of two ball bearings installed on the axis of the wheel.

 


 

Balance of forces

Balance of forces along y1 axis :

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_B

Balance of forces along x1 axis :

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_B

We have the following relationship between Rrf and R :

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_R

Then, it comes:

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_G

Expressing the following equalities :

2018.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_F

It comes then :

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_G

In this formula, the following terms are known: F magnet, m, g, α and θ. α is the angle of the rolling friction.

The combined gravity and magnetic forces cause an unbalance of the rolling ball which is not compensated by an equal and opposite reaction force. The ball is forced to rotate and this rotation drives the main wheel by means of rolling friction force.

Due to violation of Newton's third law, there is creation of excess positive energy from potential energy supplied by static magnetic and gravitic fields.

Static potential energy is thus converted into kinetic energy by that perpetual wheel.

 


full file in .PDF

Attached Files


  • 0

#4 Strange

Strange

    SuperNerd

  • Senior Members
  • 12,885 posts
  • Location珈琲店

Posted 14 May 2017 - 05:59 AM

this can work ? or no ?

 

 

No.


  • 2

#5 KipIngram

KipIngram

    Atom

  • Senior Members
  • 372 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 14 May 2017 - 04:43 PM

Wait, let me get this straight.  You're proposing that that the ball will roll up the incline of the raceway toward the magnet, and this rolling will drive the wheel counterclockwise continuously?

 

No, that won't work.  You don't even really have to do the math to show it won't work - this sort of thing never works.  You're putting no energy in, and you noted the various ways energy can be lost.  Conservation of energy prohibits all devices of this nature.

 

If you execute a detailed analysis of the system correctly it will show that.  If you do an analysis that does imply continuous rotation of the wheel then you made a mistake in the analysis somewhere.

 

The other reason you know it won't work is that if it would work we'd have machinery all over the place that exploited the principle.  :-)


  • 1

#6 studiot

studiot

    Genius

  • Senior Members
  • 6,637 posts
  • LocationSomerset, England

Posted 14 May 2017 - 04:49 PM

 

It is important to note that the static potential energy of the magnetic force is converted into pure kinetic energy.

 

Not quite I think.

 

Check the geometry very carfully for the position of the centre of gravity.


  • 1

#7 humility

humility

    Quark

  • Senior Members
  • 40 posts

Posted 14 May 2017 - 05:21 PM

I dont think the ball would roll. It would just be dragged. And without the rolling motion the wheel won't spin. Because the magnet would have to just pull on the top edge of the ball, letting go as soon as that edge is no longer the top, repeat. For the ball to roll. And thats not how magnets work.

Like how if you try to play pool on a air hockey table, everytime you hit a ball in the center, it just skids along the table rather than rolling.
  • 1

#8 KipIngram

KipIngram

    Atom

  • Senior Members
  • 372 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 14 May 2017 - 05:36 PM

Well, I think the magnet would pull on the whole ball to various degrees, create a force distribution throughout it.  And then whether it rolls or gets dragged depends only on the friction coefficient between the ball and wheel.  The magnetic attraction is not going to direction cause the ball to rotate, but contact with the wheel could, depending on the specific numbers an analysis revealed.

 

But even if you grant rolling, the motion is still going to be transient and come to an end.  It's entirely possible that the wheel might turn a bit when you first introduce the magnetic (i.e., when you "switch on" the magnetic field.)  But the steady state solution to the entire problem is static.  There will be no "unbalanced force" on the wheel, because the component of gravitational force on the ball tangential to the wheel will be precisely balanced by the component of the magnetic force on the ball tangential to the wheel.

 

When this thing has no magnetic, we all know that the ball will be at the bottom of the wheel.  It's still experiencing a gravitational force, but that force is normal to the wheel's inner surface.  No tangential force - no motion.  With the magnet in place the total force on the ball (gravitational and magnetic) will be... normal to the inner surface of the wheel.  No tangential force - no motion.


  • 1

#9 ali_baba

ali_baba

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 14 May 2017 - 09:36 PM

Link removed by staff

 

See The Video File


  • 0

#10 KipIngram

KipIngram

    Atom

  • Senior Members
  • 372 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 14 May 2017 - 09:47 PM

No.  I suspect the whole story isn't being portrayed there.  That is just not how the world works.  As I said, if that worked we'd have many, many devices in regular use based on the process.  Especially if it was patented in 1823.


  • 1

#11 studiot

studiot

    Genius

  • Senior Members
  • 6,637 posts
  • LocationSomerset, England

Posted 14 May 2017 - 09:53 PM

A video from 1823?

 

:eek:


  • 1

#12 KipIngram

KipIngram

    Atom

  • Senior Members
  • 372 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 14 May 2017 - 09:56 PM

:-)  That would be pretty rad, wouldn't it?  Early in the video it had a frame about something patented in 1823.


  • 1

#13 studiot

studiot

    Genius

  • Senior Members
  • 6,637 posts
  • LocationSomerset, England

Posted 14 May 2017 - 10:03 PM

 

Balance of forces

Balance of forces along y1 axis :

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_B

Balance of forces along x1 axis :

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_B

We have the following relationship between Rrf and R :

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_R

Then, it comes:

2012.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_G

Expressing the following equalities :

2018.08.11_MagnetMotor_OverunityEngine_F

 

This maths starts with an elementary mistake.

 

The forces are not balanced yet the author writes an equilibrium equation as though the ball and wheel were in equilibrium.

 

They cannot be in equilibrium since they are in motion, suffering accelerations and decelerations.

 

 

So can we have a correct analysis please?


  • 1

#14 ali_baba

ali_baba

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 15 May 2017 - 03:44 AM

i think this is a game between Gra vs Mag.

 

experience is better than science. for Trust.  Has anyone tested ?


Edited by ali_baba, 15 May 2017 - 03:49 AM.

  • 0

#15 hypervalent_iodine

hypervalent_iodine

    Malevolent Viper

  • Moderators
  • 3,611 posts

Posted 15 May 2017 - 06:50 AM

!

Moderator Note

ali_baba, I have once again removed the link to the video. Please stop doing this. Ask your questions and present your ideas here. You shouldn't need a video to carry the entirety of what you're asking.


  • 1

#16 Bender

Bender

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 720 posts

Posted 15 May 2017 - 12:39 PM

experience is better than science. for Trust.  Has anyone tested ?

In a way, science is experience, but in a rigorous way.

 

Without the rigor, experience is nothing but a bunch of anecdotes.

 

I have tested magnets and wheels and rolling balls and conservation of energy separately. There is no need to test them again combined in a different configuration.


  • 1

#17 ali_baba

ali_baba

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 15 May 2017 - 08:48 PM

then, it can not work . so it's just one of thousands tricks.


  • 2

#18 Bender

Bender

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 720 posts

Posted 16 May 2017 - 06:14 AM

Correct. It is quite easy to fake a movie.
  • 1

#19 Externet

Externet

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 1,527 posts
  • LocationMideast U.S.

Posted 16 May 2017 - 02:07 PM

Easy to make one.  Put a shaft on a frisbee and a bearing ball in its channel.  Then come back with results of the failure.


  • 1
Abolish the deciBel !

#20 DrP

DrP

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 1,959 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 16 May 2017 - 02:11 PM

Even if you did get the set up to turn and spin unaided it would be slow and any power harnessed would not be enough to remake the magnet once it's field had depleted.


  • 1

"Tonight I am going to party like it's on sale for $19.99"! - Apu Nahasapeemapetilon





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users