Pole shift?

[swansont]

Watch the video this is pretty well confirmation of a pole shift

from my perspective, so this guy is a nutter too.

 

Yep. He embraced astrology 30 seconds in. Nutter. Couldn't stand more than 2 minutes of his droning, though.

 

Here's Polaris basically not moving in a time-lapse video from last summer.

 

[Semjase]

 

Yep. He embraced astrology 30 seconds in. Nutter. Couldn't stand more than 2 minutes of his droning, though.

 

Here's Polaris basically not moving in a time-lapse video from last summer.

 

 

No denying what you see, providing the date is correct.

 

On the video he is not a good speaker but watch the video

from the 8 minute 30 second mark you will hear his important

observations.

[John Cuthber]

Does he explain who reset all the satellite TV dishes?

Does he explain who redrew Galileo's pictures of the moon?

Does he explain who rebuilt Stonehenge?

If not, there's no real point watching is there?

[Semjase]

Account for documented reports on physical pole shifts

on outside planets and a moon. How much more convincing

evidence do you need that some force is acting on the

the magnetic fields of planets and moons in our solar system.

 

By comparing the pattern of the depressions with fractures that would
result from stresses caused by a shift in Europa’s rotational axis, the
researchers determined that the axis had shifted by approximately 80°.
The previous axis of rotation is now located about 10° from the present
equator.

Read more: http://www.universetoday.com/14278/pole-shift-on-europa/#ixzz2MVuser6P

The Russians are reporting changes that are being recorded in space
that have never been seen before. We cannot verify this information
“for certain,” but we do know that the scientific body reporting it is
real, and that a Dr. Dmitriev does head this body. Also, I have
personally been before the Russian National Academy of Science, in
Moscow. Speaking for the Academy in Siberia, Dr. Dmitriev says that the
effects reported below have been observed (these are not quotes from
Dr. Dmitriev, but extracts from his report).

What’s truly amazing, since some people here on Earth have been
expecting and predicting a pole shift for some time now, is that the
Russians report that Uranus and Neptune appear to have had recent pole
shifts. When the Voyager II space probe flew past Uranus and Neptune,
the apparent north and south magnetic poles were sizably offset from
where the rotational pole was in earlier recordings. In one case, it
was 50 degrees off, and in the other case the difference was around 40
degrees.

read more: http://crisisboom.com/2011/01/23/pole-shift-2011/

 

[John Cuthber]

Meanwhile, back on planet earth.

Does he explain who reset all the satellite TV dishes?
Does he explain who redrew Galileo's pictures of the moon?
Does he explain who rebuilt Stonehenge?
If not, there's no real point watching is there?

[swansont]

 

Account for documented reports on physical pole shifts

on outside planets and a moon. How much more convincing

evidence do you need that some force is acting on the

the magnetic fields of planets and moons in our solar system.

 

By comparing the pattern of the depressions with fractures that would

result from stresses caused by a shift in Europa’s rotational axis, the

researchers determined that the axis had shifted by approximately 80°.

The previous axis of rotation is now located about 10° from the present

equator.

Read more: http://www.universetoday.com/14278/pole-shift-on-europa/#ixzz2MVuser6P

That's Europa, not the earth.

 

The Russians are reporting changes that are being recorded in space

that have never been seen before. We cannot verify this information

“for certain,” but we do know that the scientific body reporting it is

real, and that a Dr. Dmitriev does head this body. Also, I have

personally been before the Russian National Academy of Science, in

Moscow. Speaking for the Academy in Siberia, Dr. Dmitriev says that the

effects reported below have been observed (these are not quotes from

Dr. Dmitriev, but extracts from his report).

What’s truly amazing, since some people here on Earth have been

expecting and predicting a pole shift for some time now, is that the

Russians report that Uranus and Neptune appear to have had recent pole

shifts. When the Voyager II space probe flew past Uranus and Neptune,

the apparent north and south magnetic poles were sizably offset from

where the rotational pole was in earlier recordings. In one case, it

was 50 degrees off, and in the other case the difference was around 40

degrees.

read more: http://crisisboom.com/2011/01/23/pole-shift-2011/

 

Magnetic pole shifts are not rotational shifts. I've pointed this out before.

[Semjase]

Could this be the sun's binary star pulling on

Earth's magnetic pole? Could someone

explain this video?

 

 

 

 

[John Cuthber]

Could this be the sun's binary star pulling on
Earth's magnetic pole?

No, for two reasons. The Sun isn't part of a binary system and the sun's magnetic field is tiny compared to the gravitational field at this distance.

Did you ever think about learning some physics?

If you had then you would know that binary stars have to orbit their common centre of mass so, from time to time we would see both of them. Because of the distances involved they would be seen more than once a year.

Also you would know that the magnetic field of a dipole, like the sun, falls as the cube of the distance while the gravitational effect only falls as the square of the distance.

 

 

OK, I guess you can't be bothered with physics.

What about common sense?

If two suns were visible in China then they would also be visible in other places round the world, but the only report comes from China.

 

There are two ways of looking at that- one more "polite" than the other.

One is to remember that China has sent out faked footage before.

The other is to assume that it's some local effect- like reflection from a cloud or even just a lens flare.

 

In any event, it hasn't got anything to do with a shift in the earth's rotation or magnetic field.

 

So, why did you post it?

[Ophiolite]

I find myself wondering why, when all of Semjase's 'evidence' is easily refuted - and has been, that this thread is still entitled to the relative honour of being in Speculations.

[John Cuthber]

By the way Semjase, I forgot to remind you that you still haven't addressed this

Meanwhile, back on planet earth.
Does he explain who reset all the satellite TV dishes?
Does he explain who redrew Galileo's pictures of the moon?
Does he explain who rebuilt Stonehenge?
If not, there's no real point watching is there?

[Semjase]

The previous video obviously isn't fake

because here's two more unrelated videos

that show a second sun. It could have influence

on the Earth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Ophiolite]

You seriously think no one else would have noticed the appearance of a second sun? Tell me, where do you think it went to?

 

More to the point, when you complete your master's thesis on "How practising scientists can be duped into arguing with an apparent fool for many weeks at a time on internet forums" would you send us a copy?

[John Cuthber]

Same problem. Why was it only a local effect?

Do you not realise that the sun is the sun? If there were two in China there would be two everywhere else at the same time. Everybody would see it.

However reflections from clouds and lens flare would only affect one site.

So, the evidence (taken together with all the people who didn't notice that they suddenly had two shadows, shows that there are not two suns. It's just some optical illusion.

 

Incidentally, the site's rules expect you to answer valid criticism so I expect an explanation of the apparent gormlessness of nearly all 7 billion people on earth (Why didn't most people ever see two suns?)

and some answers to this

Meanwhile, back on planet earth.
Does he explain who reset all the satellite TV dishes?
Does he explain who redrew Galileo's pictures of the moon?
Does he explain who rebuilt Stonehenge?
If not, there's no real point watching is there?

[swansont]

The previous video obviously isn't fake

because here's two more unrelated videos

that show a second sun. It could have influence

on the Earth.

 

You really need to get up to speed on what is considered scientific evidence.

 

It's easy to get an extra reflection if you take a picture through a window, and there are atmospheric refraction possibilities. If there were actually two suns, they should be regularly visible.

[Semjase]

All I could find is photographic evidence,

no one wants to talk about it.

 

Here's more photographic evidence

that's all there is

 

http://www.google.ca/search?q=two+suns+in+the+sky&hl=en&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=iwc9UbjbLNHuqQGf_4HICg&sqi=2&ved=0CEUQsAQ&biw=1271&bih=585

Edited March 10, 2013 by Semjase

[ACG52]

I can't believe this is actually being argued.

[swansont]

Lens flares and sun dogs are well-known optical phenomena.

[Ophiolite]

All I could find is photographic evidence,

no one wants to talk about it.

 

Here's more photographic evidence

that's all there is

 

http://www.google.ca/search?q=two+suns+in+the+sky&hl=en&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=iwc9UbjbLNHuqQGf_4HICg&sqi=2&ved=0CEUQsAQ&biw=1271&bih=585

Please stop posting more crap and address some of the points raised. Specifically this:

You seriously think no one else would have noticed the appearance of a second sun? Tell me, where do you think it went to?

 

I give you fair warning that if you fail to answer these questions and make a reasonable attempt at addressing similar points and queries from other posters I shall report your posts and request moderators take appropriate action.

[Semjase]

Maybe the science world has noticed and maybe it's

not always and easily visible to the naked eye.

Here's the opinion of scientist on this object

in a very informative article on the subject

 

Quote

 

According to John Anderson of Jet Propulsion laboratory in

Pasadena, Calif., this odd behavior suggests that the sun has a

unseen companion, a dark star gravitationally bound to it but

billion miles away.

 

Read more:http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/05/planet-x-niribu-old-articles-that-have.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

According
to John Anderson of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.,
this odd behavior suggests that the sun has an unseen companion, a dark
star gravitationally bound to it but billions of miles away. ... Other
scientists suggest that the most likely cause of the orbital snags is a
tenth planet 4 to 7 billion miles beyond Neptune.

[hypervalent_iodine]

!

Moderator Note

We're only going to let you spout ridiculous assertions and avoid the call for evidence so many times, Semjase. This thread is locked and you are not permitted to reintroduce the topic.