Semjase Posted February 1, 2013 Author Share Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) I have to start with the most accurate prophecy to date, the prophecy of the popes which is an exact short description in order of 112 popes, Benedict is the 111th pope , Peter the Roman is last pope mentioned and also it says that the 7 hilled city will be destroyed.This prophecy is an over riding prophecy due to it's accuracy so if Benedict is still alive then were safe. Other prophecies mention specific months but not years, and some prophecies tie the second coming, world conflict, geological upheaval and 1000 years of peace in that order. Bible prophecies being the most notable tie the first 3 in at the same time. What are the chances of all these prophecies independently being arrived at being all wrong? If there is a God it would be a good time for him prove his existence now and the second coming would be a good place to start. Edited February 1, 2013 by Semjase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 I'm a believer in eye witness testimonies I'm not a eye witness to these events but other people are, if eye witness testimonies had no credibility why would they be allowed in a court of law? Science doesn't accept eye witnesses but a court of law does? These are not eye witness testimonies Semjase, they are at best third hand accounts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tar Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Semjase, Well as the spokesperson for this future race, can you ask them for us, for some of their technology, and a few helpful peices of detailed information? Such as which of the many possible cities and towns that are built on seven hills is going to be destroyed on which date, and we can order an evacuation a couple days ahead. We could also use the name and address of the antichrist, if he/she is already on this Earth, or the time and place of his/her future birth, so we can alert the local authorities to take proper precautionary measures. Sure would help to know exactly who not to listen to. Regards, TAR2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 2, 2013 Author Share Posted February 2, 2013 (edited) I don't have direct contact with Semjase's people some their technology makes star treks look somewhat backwards. Do the math how many cities have 7 hills not many. I don't have access to information concerning that. This I know for sure events can be made real in the future, through time travel, which people are yet to experience and no matter what information is returned to the present you cannot change the outcome of that event no matter what you do. It has to do with quantum reality where things are made real from the future to the past. I have dealings with the most advanced God there is. God of the bible is not too happy about that so he made me into the fake antichrist, I work for the greater good. The real antichrist is the leader who starts world war 3. Just like God made the Jesus name it's faked. The real Jesus is Jmmanuel. Edited February 2, 2013 by Semjase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 OK, that's a testable prediction. If we are still here at Christmas will you accept that religion gets things wrong and science gets things right? If not then you are admitting that your actions have nothing much to do with science and you earlier assertion that you are a "science person" is nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tar Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Semjase, I'm done. You have nothing sensible to offer. Nevermind, TAR2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 2, 2013 Author Share Posted February 2, 2013 (edited) I had channel opened to by an intelligence identifying itself as the Alien God so me being a scientific person looked for evidence to support their claim and that its not just an over active imagination I found plenty they showed me a factoring alogrithm that will easily factor RSA challenge numbers. It's a security problem so I really can't use it. I was curious if anyone brought forward information concerning the Alien God and then I found this He shallregard neither the God of his fathers nor the desire of women, norregard any god; for he shall exalt himself above them all. 38 But intheir place he shall honor a god of fortresses;and a god which his fathers did not know he shall honor with gold andsilver, with precious stones and pleasant things. 39 Thus he shall actagainst the strongest fortresses with a foreign god [literally analien god], which he shall acknowledge, and advance its glory; and heshall cause them to rule over many, and divide the land for gain. that quote is right out of the bible next I looked for someone who might of brought an alien god forward in the public eye there was no one so I'm saying what the hell is going on here. So what do I think? I just found this an interpretation of the above quote Here it is apparent that the Antichrist will not only acknowledge the"aliens", the minions of the "alien god of fortresses", but he will alsocontrol their activities. He will be their "emissary" and spokesman. Edited February 2, 2013 by Semjase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 I'm a science person not a religious mental case. I had channel opened to by an intelligence identifying itself as the Alien God so me being a scientific person looked for evidence to support their claim and that its not just an over active imagination 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 2, 2013 Author Share Posted February 2, 2013 I think God has dishonesty problem you can't have 2 antichrists at the end times the bible refers to the antichrist singularly God needs a diversion to take peoples attention away from from the real one he doesn't want known and fabricates one. Just like Jmmanuel God couldn't live with Jmmanuel's background created a factious name, Jesus for him and changed his teachings and life story, deciding on the events he wanted out of countless possibilities in the future. On further research on the second coming I've found that it is after the prophesied tragic turn of events in this world, when Jmmanuel with renewed life and alien help will establish 1000 years of peace in this world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Did it occur to you that the reason the Bible contradicts itself is because it's a book of made-up stories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 (edited) Science has already proven that there is fiction in the bible, but when science fully unravels quantum reality and comes up the entire picture of all science will fact from fiction, and the entire truth about the bible be accepted. The science of God kind of has a ring to it. When comes to evidence science has to start somewhere, biblical and religious prophecies that are verified can be classified as evidence that there is important verifiable facts in the bible. Religion is a murky science and it will take a long time before it's finally unraveled. Edited February 3, 2013 by Semjase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 The science of God kind of has a ring to it. We already have such a science. It's called psychology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Science has already proven that there is fiction in the bible, but when science fully unravels quantum reality and comes up the entire picture of all science will fact from fiction, and the entire truth about the bible be accepted. The science of God kind of has a ring to it. Do you realise that, when science reveals a few more truths it's likely that there will be so little left of the bible that " the entire truth about the bible" won't mean anything? " the entire truth about the bible" may well turn out to be that the Bible was made up by a self interested group about 100 years after the events it purports to record. "All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 (edited) The first question does God exist at all? If you don't ask that question the the rest is irrelevant. The next question then is the bible God's handiwork, or the work of men? God or no God is the question? I guess until the matter is finally resolved it will be a matter of faith.Then it becomes the question of the value of faith? Pascal's Wager might resolve this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_Wager Edited February 3, 2013 by Semjase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 "The first question does God exist at all?" And the answer is that there's no reason to suppose He does. There's also strong evidence that the God described in the Bible does not actually exist. The Bible is clearly not the work of any competent God since it contradicts itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 (edited) God of the bible never said he was a nice guy how many people did the church burn at the stake? That's why I have a belief it in higher science, higher values and a higher God. The burning of Giordano Bruno a catholic priest is classic example of the church's historical contempt for new scientific ideas. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno Edited February 3, 2013 by Semjase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 How is this not breaking the rule here against proselytizing? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 I not trying to convert anyone I'm just discussing facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I not trying to convert anyone I'm just discussing facts.Your posts are long on opinion and light on facts. That word means something different to you than the rest of us, apparently. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semjase Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 I'll make it clear from now on when it is my opinion or a known fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 ! Moderator Note Semjase, if you want to discuss religion here, we have certain expectations regarding evidence, fact vs opinion, and non-alien involvement, which you clearly are not meeting. This thread is closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts