Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MonDie

  1. REVISION OF: "The problem with using too much liquid is that the substance will get washed into the mouth before it is removed, but it needs plenty of motion, not plenty of liquid. ... You can't rinse all of the inside of your lips without accidentally ingesting some of that water, even if you spit it out and try rinse it out. ..." This was based on a hypothesis that seemed to be the only hypothesis that could account. It's also true that solids would pick the substance up if the lips had been wet within the hour. This is potentially a confound since the act of rinsing was also incidentally moistening, and I would typically eat after doing it whereupon the solid foods picked it up. This became a repeated observation. However, I distinctly remember thinking that I wasn't going to drop the other hypothesis even though the two hypotheses potentially confound one another. However, I found more corroboration for the hypothesis that foods could pick it up if the lips had been moist, and I would privilege it over the excess-liquid-spillage hypothesis, if the latter didn't also make a lot of sense and moreover to find corroboration. That is, finding corroboration in the unsafeness of drinking from large bottles upon awakening, rather than small bottles, and how this was consistent with a spillage hypothesis that was only a small leap and could seem to be operating in at least one other context where no other hypothesis seemed to suffice.
  2. I won't be able to finish because people are withholding all money from me, into starvation. This much became clear: Whether it starts on the lip's corner from sleeping on my side (it probably does), it inevitably migrates across the lips where it becomes stuck on the surface, or dare I say in the epithelium, but the lips are sticky. You can remove it by getting the lips mildly wet (?: setting for between immediately and twenty/thirty minutes) and applying plenty, plenty of motion (?: with two different paper surfaces). After going through ten tissues, I removed most of it, maybe close to all of it. The problem with using too much liquid is that the substance will get washed into the mouth before it is removed, but it needs plenty of motion, not plenty of liquid. ?: Why accidentally rinsing any liquid into the mouth causes detectable effects, (?: is that it probably has some sort of rinsing half-life, (?: or whatever is exposed does before more of it loosens up and becomes exposed)). (-- In that case, avoidance is probably a much worse strategy compared to removal.) The thing causing delayed sniffles has disappeared again. Alas, if your wipe doesn't accidentally contact your face, you don't need to wipe your cheeks or the cheek that was on your pillow. You should wipe outside skin before inside the lips, starting from a broad cheek area, moving to a narrower cheek area, then start wiping in the lips. This seemed to work before this mystery substance disappeared again. This also seemed to mitigate the other substance's effects slightly even though I didn't do the entire lips, but I might not be able to confirm this. You can't rinse all of the inside of your lips without accidentally ingesting some of that water, even if you spit it out and try rinse it out. I slept like a baby. 😂 I have had dark circles under my eyes for some months or maybe a year. You can stick your tongue at the can, if you're choosing avoidance over removal. Without the tongue, the can's liquid goes toward the corners, and this tongue-ing seemed to mitigate the effects. The mystery substance that caused a more delayed sniveling seemed to sit around in the saliva. This became clear when I experienced its effects immediately after lying on my side. However, it still had a pretty consistent onset time of two-and-a-half or three hours. Finished!
  3. I don't know if I can conduct a test for it until I know what it is or at least how it is behaving, and the situation is becoming more complex as I collect more observations. I will definitely check it out for resonant observations. I also have my old chemistry textbook that I read the first half of. Stopped before Lewis Structure. I've been feeling agitated for the last five or six years, and I began thinking aloud after I quit the prescribed anti-psychotics. The agitation--the restless scatterbrained thinking aloud--got noticeably worse after I started rinsing my face with water. Something else, though, was causing the allergic response. Whatever was causing the agitation seemed to be remaining active for so long that it was sitting in wait on my pillowcase, where the contaminant would pass onto my cheeks where I would rinse it onto my mouth by pouring more water onto it. In contrast, whatever caused the allergic response seems to be more soluble such that it rinses away more easily, but the allergy contaminant also has the ability to invade the aqueous solution on the wet tissues. Recently, I've been wiping my mouth with wet tissues, but the wet tissues seem to pull in the contaminant from wherever they can: the surrounding face, or the edge of the plastic bag where the baggie opens. Imagine somebody trying to spot mop a floor covered with a dried goop, a dried goop that becomes liquid again whenever it contacts the moisture of the water from the mop. That dried/wet goop is the allergy-causing contaminant. The full coverage of the residue over all the lips is a problem because you will eat or drink it multiple times: you eat the inside of your lips, then your toothbrush will replace it with contaminant from the lower lip or the lip's corners, then you eat it again. I will say this tentatively, and I will revise it if I am wrong, but the best approach seems to be to let the external skin dry after wet wiping it externally and before wiping inside mouth. You also have to open wide for the corners and wipe the inside corners carefully, so you don't draw in more from the surrounding skin. I am not sure how long it takes to build up inside the lip's corners*. Regarding the lip's corners. I seemed to be experiencing poor concentration related to the lip corners, poor concentration that wasn't noticeably until twice it manifested as physical fatigue combined with overwhelming inattention that was hard to ignore. Get it? Overwhelming inattention that you can't ignore? Yeah, I need a method to asses it. I am not sure how long it takes to build up yet, but I had literal mental and physical fatigue when I finally noticed it. Anyway, it seems to peak after two hours or from one-hour to three-hour, and to last for a total of seven (7) hours. Incidentally, the allergic thing usually sets in after ten minutes, but when I began wiping my lips, it started producing a more enduring allergic effect lasting from two-and-a-half hours until five hours or so, and this happened regardless of whether it was ingested from my hands or from my lips. Talk about unnecessary confounds! How am I supposed to assess my own ability to concentrate? Anyway, the solution to these problems, tentatively, is to very carefully wipe inside the opened lips after allowing the external skin to dry after being wet wiped. Otherwise, there is an alternative and pretty straightforward, albeit messy, method: pour the water onto your lips while lying down. --> Pour the water onto your lips while lying down. Clear water that won't stain. Patiently pour gently from a small or low-filled bottle so you don't get it up your nose, or else it will be carrying something else with it. And get the bottom of your lip too, or else the remaining contaminant will get spread around by your toothbrush. In fact, a rectangular shaped section of skin surface is probably more optimal than a lip-shaped section. Other discoveries: Whatever is causing the diahrea, probably the stuff on my cheek, only has this degistive effect after being heated or being exposed to chemicals, including a disinfecting wipe and a sensitive skin wipe, but this chemical product also removes from the surface very, very. That is, if you don't toothbrush your way into a round two. The over-heated form might have an onset of less than an hour rather than more than an hour. Plastic bags as gloves still cause problems if you have to reach into a deep container, because you still have to touch the edge of the bag to open it. I will have to work this out somehow. Regarding soda cans, open them carefully with a firm grip, and do not pour anything onto the can after opening it with your hand.
  4. Here is Francesca Fiorentini's reporting from early July, prior to Kabul's surrender. Afghanistan is 50:00 onward, and the finance angle is from 90 onward. (Empire Files is good for Israel Palestine.) From a scientific perspective, one might analogize that the Taliban, a supposedly "primitive" culture, pushed out the foreign invader like it was influenza, a naturally occurring viral infection. All the Taliban needed was a real boogeyman like what humans have evolved to detect. Although agnostic atheists are only pushing for what seems like the next logical step (i.e. why not ditch the God too?), it is worth noting how we've wandered, or carelessly stumbled, into a supposedly modern culture of hyper-individualism and continual oligarchy. What do the Taliban have that we have willingly surrendered to the marketing and propaganda that have mangled/modernized our values into accomodating whatever corrupt, lying oligarchs they propped up? Trump started the withdrawal, Biden carried through with it, and neoliberal imperialists and war racketeers were all-along profiting from mediocre work. Meanwhile, communist China actually seems to be adopting the empirial strategy of bolstering its allies through infrastructure projects of the sort that we cannot even commit to here in the continental USA. Another war finance story: we wasted trillions beefing up bulky fighter jets rather than improving on an older, lightweight design. It was TYT. I'll find it. Lockheed Martin. "U.S. Military Admits Trillion Dollar Mistake" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbzEMdJBagg
  5. I love Mr Bungle. I never listened to Faith No More. We need moral behavior, not moral frameworks. One-Two Punch. Thank you Anna Biishiki? What you do is important. I've been waking up late every Monday.
  6. *oops, sinusoidal is a math term I am not on any drugs. I took anti-psychotics for about a year about five years ago, but otherwise I hardly ever taken an Aspirin.
  7. Also, looking at the splash patterns in the sink, I'm wondering whether some sink splashing reaches my moustache region when I am rinsing my lips and not rinsing above my lips. That could be why the moustache hairs are problematic. But, per the above, I still remember what I ate: rod-shaped cookies first, and then bagels yesterday. The bagels didn't touch my moustache region but only a wider area of my lips, after my lips were extensively rinsed, and the effect was unusually severe despite the extensive rinsing. I don't know what is happening today, the day after, but something is going on, and I'm tentatively blaming the sink. I'm carefully biting my crackers out of their bag after running out of bottled water, and I'm pulling out the ones that might have touched my lip. I just had another flare up and it made me momentarily reconsider, but I'm pretty sure. Another Addendum: Two days ago I decided to snort the water into my nose until my nasal passages were clean. I may have actually re-sensitized myself to the effects if it could have splashed from the sink to my nose, essentially refilling my nasal cavity with more of it so that I experience a more enduring sinusoidal effect.
  8. I don't know why the book summary is missing. I already have general biological knowledge and personally acquired medical knowledge. Even at sub-sniffling doses I can feel restless and scatter-brained, but this effect oddly doesn't increase proportionally to the sniveling and on a few occasions has been quite intense in the absence of any sniffles. I don't know whether to blame it on histamine. Anyway, I have just confirmed that I am washing it from my cheek rather than washing it off from my lips. I should probably partition my pouring technique into two different steps, so that my pouring doesn't just grab more from the periphery as it washes away. I poured out more than a few ounces this time, and I still had issues. On the prior night I tried putting plastic over my face, but I was touching the plastic as I was tearing the ear holes. Working it out later, I realized that I had indirectly touched my cheek on the very periphery of where I would pour the water, and it was its location on the periphery that allowed it to act as a reservoir of sorts. I still don't know what happened with the facemask. The facemask was never an issue UNTIL I tried pouring water (and sweetened tea) over it, and was only an issue immediately after, not thereafter. It probably tends toward an equilibrium with however much is on my lips whenever my lips are touching the mask. Do I have to add a warning? Do not put plastic over your face. Especially, do not put plastic over your face overnight! It wasn't even necessary. ... Because you could suffocate due to the non-breathable, non-porous nature of the material, i.e. the plastic. I use plastic to keep things dry. I was reluctant to put it over my face.
  9. I have been allergically responding to the tap water, and I think I have worked out the hydrodynamics of it well enough to post it with some certainty. I don't know where my mom's apartment's water comes from. Any help understanding this would be appreciated. Main allergic response: The first thing I addressed was the tableware. Yes, tableware and silverware washed in tap water is the #1 culprit if no action at all is taken. My fingers were the number two culprit. Even accidental contact with fingers was noticeably aggravating to my allergy. Rinsing my fingers with store-bought water was ultimately more wasteful than simply using inside-out bags as gloves. Indigestion: I have also had some big problems with my toothbrush since I began sequestering it. This phenomenon was unique because it wasn't an allergic reaction, but it seems to happen consistently. I think the toothpaste and maybe something else is reacting over night on the toothbrush, so I have to always always rinse my toothbrush before using it, ... lest I risk digestive issues. Beware, these digestive issues are exacerbated by energy drinks - it happens an hour after whichever happens after the other, the energy drink or the toothbrushing. Smaller allergic response: Other more negligible exposure points, negligible as they were, were illuminating. Some wrappers allow hit or miss transmission, and the best solution is to bite the corners off before pulling the wrapper open. It is possible that pouring over a horizontal surface splashed a negligible amount back into my water container, but I am not sure anymore because it was a wide-mouthed bottle, which has its own problems if my lips aren't rinsed. In any case, if the surface isn't solid or isn't horizontal, it isn't an issue in any degree. It also gets ingested from my lips in negligible amounts, presumably when certain circumstances convene. For example, moustache hairs can be problematic in unpredictable ways. I just learned that (with moustache hairs) I am able to ingest some via my pillowcase. (I hadn't shaved, ) I poured about half an ounce of water over my lips, being sparing with my water, but instead of washing off my lips I washed down whatever was beside my lips after it leaped from my pillowcase to my face. I will soon explain how this pertains to tableware. Any effects of ingesting it from the lips are negligible, but the effect I just described seems to interact with what is eaten or drank. Thick foods, like doughnuts and thick cookies, and plastic bottles, contrasted with cans, seem to allow it to pass into my mouth from my lips in negligible quantities. It seems to rinse from my lips more easily than it rinses from fabrics. When I rinsed my pillowcase contact point with insufficient water (maybe half an ounce of water), my lips became a noticeable exposure point. The same thing had happened with my fabric facemask, but I poured out at least ten ounces of water over it. Compared to my lips, It rinsed down the fabric at less than one-tenth the pace, requiring more than ten times the water. I have not clearly recreated either effect more than once, but the implication is that tableware, despite being the worst unrinsed, is also the easiest to rinse. Nothing to my memory contradicts this. All of these were negligible exposure sources, and none caused the digestive problems that I had with my toothbrush + energy drinks. Cans are better than bottles, but I don't like wasting the water rinsing the rim of the can because I didn't want to remove the can carefully. Thanks. I hope I don't have to edit this.
  10. One. Actually, I have to believe you believe it. Two. My belief should be consequential to me to be part of my perspective, or it should be part of somebody's perspective to constitute a meaningful statement.
  11. Netanyahu-Israel's government rose to power as what suspiciously resembles a coup government, its retaliations are always disproportionate and reckless, and it gets ample funding and weaponry from the United States, and now we are blocking a UN resolution to condemn its present actions. This conflict has been a steady, slow-burning fire, but the USA, whose alliance has global strategical implications(?), alongside the Wahabi Saudis and the militaristic Al-Sisi, will bare responsibility when it escalates into a Palestinian genocide whereupon the Iranians will take matters into their own hands. All roads lead to Iran. Before the British-American coup of Iran Couping in Iran, 1953! A Deep Cut With Stephen Kinzer (The Commitee Program/Nomiki Konst) After the coup, reign of the Shah in Iran, before the second revolution Iran 1979: Anatomy of a Revolution | Featured Documentary (Al Jazeera) and also "Iran 1979 Legacy of a Revolution" (Al Jazeera) Palestine and its ally Jordan, another victim of poverty and political violence King Hussein of Jordan: On A Knife Edge and part two Survival of a Dynasty (Al Jazeera), but they could use an English dub. There is apparently a French documentary about Yitzhak Rabine. Saudi/Israeli alliance, Saudi/Israeli holy sites, Saudi/Israeli political assassinations, and each one killing... its own.
  12. Yet the currency would still remain valid in those times, upholding those inequalities even in times of strive. To give a more biological perspective, I think the ways the legitimacy of a currency is maintained are arguably very primatological: territory/land, food patches/resources, safety in numbers/shelter. If these things were still free, it would probably be easier to break from our currencies when they became counterproductive. Cultural hegemony of the elites/majorities can be a, a, something with claws.
  13. Indeed, why does a computer hacker have access to more systems? Moreover, does he have a right to those systems he hacked into? Nobody owns the Internet! But somebody does code the code, and knows the code's deepest vulnerabilities. Perhaps the dollar's deception of simplicity deceptively suggests anti-regulatory stances like longing for the gold standard, while legitimizing the rich. The deceptively simple concept forgets that the power of currency actually comes from an idea, that so much exploitation is actually psychological, and these psychological tendencies are what crashes the system. America's 2009 economic crisis, i.e. "the housing bubble", was caused by predatory loans.
  14. Not knowing socialism or communism, I tend to assume that the communism-capitalism axis is as superficial/cultural as the left-right axis is. It is more like some self-fulfilling guide to coalition building that probably made more sense fifty years ago. Our societies seems to be full of reciprocity-driven concepts that would useless without a cultural context, including money and stocks. Profit can have unintended side-effects. The stock market is self-fulfilling.
  15. Then why haven't we fixed the damn problem?! Brainy Quote my ass! PS That river is full of teflon PFOA/PFOS particles. ... depending on how high up it is.
  16. As someone who is pro-education and anti-superstition, I do still think this is a matter of human nature. This is my personal perspective based on my personal online research. Both religion and, seemingly, these conspiracy theories like QAnon, disproportionally affect women, and women score higher on theory of mind and score lower on measures of autism. Theory of mind is correlated with religiosity (+ToM, -IQ). Theory of mind, measured via facial expressions, is thought to involve the ability to infer hidden motives (and "conspiracies" I suppose). And my personal speculation: The correlation of religiosity with ToM seems to be reinforced by the many correlations shared between oxytocin and religiosity, including ToM score, along with being female, monogamy, ethnocentrism, generosity, and (paradoxically if so) gloating behaviors. Vasopressin is also related to ToM, but it seems understudied compared to oxytocin. Certain measures of religiosity, like church attendance, are stronger predictors of the more desirable behaviors that are correlated with religiosity. If something like church attendance, which has indeed steadily declined, is in decline, it is probably a sign of an undesirable change rather than a desirable change. The above increases the likelihood that religion is some sort of outlet for some part of our nature. Internet conspiracy theories could be the new and even more problematic outlet for those instincts. These tech giants are apparently run by geeky libertarian types, who probably wouldn't be concerned by something like a drop in church attendance, not being aware of the sociological implications. If this is a problem of human instincts run amok, the easiest solution might be natural, not rational, corrections to the environmental factors causing the deviation. Trying to fight it with rationality might be akin to pushing a boulder up a hill. Worst case scenario: the necessary changes cannot be implemented without a political realignment. Stay tuned for even more ramblings on this perspective of mine. Schizotypal personality disorder is significantly elevated among people on the autism spectrum.* STPD (which is male-biased) was originally a subscale of BPD (which is female-biased) before it became STPD, and STPD hasn't been linked with the same sort of hyper-mentalizing that BPD has. Although "high-functioning" autism (autism with a certain IQ score) has been linked to agnostic + atheism, STPD has a unique relationship with peculiar beliefs or superstitious beliefs. The apparent suggestion is that some feature of STPD, like social isolation or socially anxious paranoia, is possibly responsible for the rise in conspiracy theories. At the non-pathological end, STPD has relationships with the Neuroticism (unsurprisingly), Antagonism, and Introverted dimensions of the Big Five. I have come across one personality study that reported an unusually high correlation between Agreeableness and Extraversion (Antagonism and Introversion), which surpassed the Agreeableness-Conscientiousness correlation. Personality is supposed to be stable over time, and not situational, but I don't see why a personality disorder with so many links to psychiatric illness should not violate this assumption of longitudinal stability. The assumption of BPD's non-treatability has also been challenged in recent times. If situational factors can exacerbate STPD symptoms, then the affected symptoms might include the peculiar beliefs. I have also come across reporting, accurate or not, that being african-american increases the likelihood of a PPD diagnosis (paranoid personality disorder). In my opinion, this should raise questions about how habitual assumptions like the fundamental attribution error can interact with stereotyping or in-group bias to affect the diagnosis of these disorders. However, environmental factors like urban lead-exposure could also potentially explain the phenomenon, if it is verified and it is the rate of PPD specifically that is elevated. *(STPD too, but SPD and OCPD were the most elevated among Asperger's patients, in the data I found.)
  17. Our virtue, your fault, acknowledging own fault-lines, or faith in leader. The seismometer, whose fault is these clumsy lies, to spare us later / to spare us leader.
  18. We should have had extras to spare. They should have gone to experts at high risk of contracting. India is a tinderbox. Even more risk, because most Indians speak English.
  19. It isn't over yet, America! Deaths (as a proportion of cases) are spiking as covid-19 ravages underfunded hospital systems in southern Europe and west Asia! https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths If we don't even send them some vaccines specifically intended for hospital workers etc., which we should have done months ago, then I hope Narendra Modi, whom I am not a fan of, rubs it in our faces when they are manufacturing the Covaxin vaccine domestically without patent restrictions. Because, by that time, it won't matter whether the patents are lifted, and that is called petty healthcare CEOs being too petty to be greedy. On another note, the microchip, if it even existed, would probably become oxidized in a peroxisome or something somewhere. Stop eating snake cakes. Matt Binder had a guest on to discuss the 12 biggest anti-vax disseminators. Let us have a live discussion about THEM. The Anti-Vaxxer Disinformation Dozen Matt Binder John Iadarola hosted Kurt Eichenwald (Anti-Vax Story Suffers SERIOUS Blow) to discuss how Andrew Wakefield set off the anti-vax movement.
  20. The thread topic seems rather trivial until you consider that "possibility", much like the set theory problem above, is really a non-referential linguistic operation that describes our use of language rather than any particular referent or experience except the experience of using language. A statement of possibility describes a hypothetical validity rather than a factual validity because it pertains to the unknown, but as the unknown becomes known then the hypothetical possibilities narrow toward the factual reality. Thus "possibility" pertains to knowledge rather than reality. Even your set theory problem makes more sense after considering that "sets" are a useful product of psychology and language rather than empirical investigation of the world, and insofar that a set is imaginary a set is free to produce the sorts of contradictions that are necessary to guide a logical operation toward its appropriate conclusion. err "factual *veracity*", not "validity" A good analogy is a wrench that doesn't fit any bolts. The wrench still exists, it just doesn't work. If my cult happened to worship that mis-shapen wrench, however, that wrench would suddenly become an important aspect of my world in the minds of myself and culties. 😋
  21. Hmmm, what about disinfection via tanning booth? I wonder.
  22. All of this is basic psychology. One gigantic problem-IMO-still looms. How easy is it to provoke a confrontation between sides? Who benefits from the resulting wrestling match? Who profits; who consumes; who condones; and who could but doesn't? Who gets a distraction? TMBS 146: Joshua Khan describes his group's delightful encounter with undercover cops. youtu.be/8MZqEuUlzDs?t=690
  23. Pregnant Woman: I might have to abort my own child. Radical Pro-Lifer: I might have to kill (liberal people) to save the fetuses. They updated their translation of Exodus. I can't find it. Is that one of those modern translation? Best wishes.
  24. I like Diablo Swing Orchestra. YouTube seems to rarely recommended anything non-white. Even the disco is white people (Faze Action). Its algorithm just tossed up Trump's Snake poem last night though. Trump reads... "Trump reads a snake poem" Hmmm Radiohead's "Desert Island Disk"
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.