dimreepr

Really? It's big enough for steotypes to emerge...

It's never been a binary question, even if we take the obvious, sex for reproduction, there's 4 group's: 1, men that can, 2, women that can, 3, men that can't, 4, women that can't, 6 if we include those that choose not to partake, 8 if we include those that can't attract a mate. And that's a question of life and death, and we're only talking about a game FFS. For me, it's because you've already dismissed the language to describe it out of hand; for instance, a large part of what it is to be male/female is subjective, so you know what it feels like to be a man because you are one, so in your imagination what it feels like to be a woman is simply the opposite of that. IOW You lack the understanding, because you've dismissed the language needed as bullshit. 😉

Indeed, we will continue to grow until physics says we can't...

Is it though? Women are very bad driver's... 😲

Well, he didn't explain it very well... 😉

You've taken that out of context, like you do with all of your excuses; you've obviously missed the part where he explains why he's not being transphobic and that there will be a certain amount of irony in the following joke's... 😉

Now that's irony... 🤓 But not them??? Ye, I get it; you're irony impaired... 😲

Can you think of a reason why I shouldn't think that???

Your generalisation isn't aimed at all, it's like a punt gun pointing at a flock of people. Greed is good for example, is it only wrong in the right circumstances, or, only right in the wrong circumstances???

I can't find the slaphead emoji 🙄, I imagine I'd use it as I frantically tried to swim away from the cameras that covers Niagara fall's...

But we're not, are we?

Really, you wanna jump down that rabbit hole???

I don't know!!! Can you tell when the event horizon is crossed? All I'm saying is, Marxism is more about balance than communism...

You'll note that in my first post in this thread I added the word finally, the inference being it's happening now.

I read what he wrote and combined that with what other's (Asimov et al) wrote, and formed an hypothesis of what he might have meant...

Just one along the way...

That was his criticism, not his vision...

For example, the Russian revolution missed a step; it went straight from subsistence farming to a capitalist end game by force, not choice...

Please explain...

Indeed, but only one of us is right... 🧐 Sorry, that's a bit too binary; it should read "but one of us is more right, you know, given the evidence!!!"

I agree, they have to play before a situation can arise... 😉

The only thing I can possibly disagree with in this statement is, that you get to decide... 🙄

But class is a stabalising feature in society, capitalism breaks class, it's the revolution that sows its own seeds...

That's a different question... Critical mass is reached when the shit creator's doesn't understand the value of the shit removers... It's more of an event horizon type deal...

I see, I think you might be missing some recent context (in this thread) to the question you quoted, unless you've swapped side's. My question isn't level dependent: It's, why don't YOU want that athlete/person (that's not you) to play that athlete/person (that's also not you) in a game you're not part of (other than in a voyeuristic/dogging sense)?