dimreepr

It's just a question for discussion, besides I'm not sure what context would change an answer.

Discuss...

Yep, but that's life; live for the if not the when. Yikes indeed, it's scary to let the future sort itself.

Whilst, making excuses.

If only trees gave off wifi.

I do Not so keen on crap, but I do like to smell my own farts.

Indeed https://www.johndesmond.com/blog/environment/the-hot-zinc-spraying-process/

Indeed, and why is corrosion a factor?

Not to mention, it is a very poor substitute for food.

Well in that why you are correct, what if the why is, you burnt all the money?

The problem is, the leaders are very charismatic and very proficient at finding the best way to appeal to the majority, who generally when pushed, just want revenge. It's a very difficult sell to persuade, on mass, that revenge can only destroy both sides rather than protect everything they care for. "Cometh the hour cometh the man", it's no coincidence that great men/women are as rare as hen's teeth. It's just far to easy to dismiss a platitude like, "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.".

Because money isn't based in reality, it's based on a promise and it's all too easy to break a promise even if you don't want to; which is a reality just not a conserved one That depends on "the" why?

FFS grow up and start to think for yourself. As they say "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter", I do get what you mean but the only moderate that's truly crushed is the one in a powerful but fearful nation.

Indeed and I suggested, in this thread, the abused becomes the abuser. It was a rhetorical question.

Now that's funny, BTW who's the IDF?

It seems not, luckily I wasn't holding my breath.

Indeed, but Israel has been hiding behind that for far too long.

Whilst I do, generally, agree I think "both sides" implies a parity that simply does not exist. That said, history shows, violence only really works for the powerful, the impoverished must use peace as their weapon.

With rocks? I've rescinded my ignore, just in case you had anything to back up the neg rep.

Indeed but never an excuse. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/u-s-blocks-investigation-60-gaza-protestors-killed-article-1.3990469

Well, that and a big arsed wall, lots of tear gas, a few tanks and etc...

For the sake of my 'new' irony meter and general peace of mind (to think I once said "you're better than this"), you're (the first) on my ignore list.

I don't know, but then I'm not looking for an excuse to kill 20 times that number.

I wonder who told you that.

Yet it's so often applicable, these days; sometimes irony just stinks.