dimreepr

WOW, so many post's and we're back to this, why do you care?

Whatever you think it used to mean isn't relevant, what it means now is found in a dictionary; for us to have a reasonable discussion we have to agree on the meaning and since this discussion IS now, then a relevant meaning has to take precedence.

I'm anything but anti religious, ask anyone or read some of my topics, in philosophy or religious thread's I've posted in (including this one if memory serves), but I am a full blown, dyed in the wool athiest. Usually when a theist resorts to such an attack, it means they've run out of logical/reasonable argument's, what's your excuse?

I don't care... 😉

Lot's of humans invented one.

But it is evidence that the concept of God is man made, which strongly suggests that "does not exist" is evidential...

Just a guess, I hope I'm wrong.

I can't help it, I'm very bored...

No, it's just a relevant question, that you've failed to answer; I'm guessing your presence here is limited...

I think they'd be saying, "see, I told you"...

I'm guessing that you're thinking that God is more than a concept? Like a rock, can't... 😇

Have you met one?

The point is, we are human and given the right conditions we are all capable of lying, being religious and deriding, those other, religion's; and at some point in our lives, we all fit into every box described by a humanity test. Ants and alien's couldn't...

Your interpretation of the meaning of the word, derivation.

Is it me, or does that sound religious; in a way, that is often used to deride religion? So, your a human like me; if you were an ant, you'd be lost without me... 😉

The thing about nukes is, it's a weapon of revenge not defence. Ukraine is facing a bully, and the rest of the playground is hoping to see them bloody it's nose, not stab it's mother.

One day their yield is less than we can eat/digest...

Then they're witches, and they'd weigh the same as a duck; so we can drown them...

When my left shoe is measured, it has no impact on my right shoe; other than, it's one of a pair...

I don't think so, but the political fallout of such an action would legitimise a tactical 'nuclear' response; and all we could do is, fire a bigger bomb; and where would that end???

Fair enough...

This is an interesting watch on the subject (hope you can view it).

That might be true as a baby (generally) but time + circumstances = me now, and me now has a percentage of good over bad, and we all think we know what that is; definitely above 75%. An extrovert would broadcast any good information about him/her, while an introvert would just hide the bad information about her/him. The point is, there's no such thing as neutral in a human. Indeed, which leaves me wondering why you'd quote me?

Are any of the 16 or so categories negative? As in something that you'd not want to be and actively seek to hide? Would you change your answers to the next job interview, if you knew the answer's to your last obviously lost you employment? It all stem's back to @iNow's point about the astrology equivalence. If it's a sensitivity to being judged, then they got it wrong, at least in this thread. 😉 Do we all tend to assume that? Only when they tend to agree...

Indeed, it's a path that we're forced to follow, apparently.