iNow

Heated ones Also, oily ones

Yes, but by upending his username to the end of every thread title he creates he is better optimizing his ideas in search engine results... nonsense or not

If you want to break a bowl or drinking glass with a hammer or power drill, it’s not the sound waves you’ll be using to do so

While you may take offense at the comments, you and your “argument” are not the same thing and his comments were very clearly about your “argument,” not you.

I find the advanced rail energy storage system to be a cool idea, but may not be precisely what’s being sought by the OP https://interestingengineering.com/energy-storage-trains-work-power-gravity

This was apparently too much to ask

When you draw an outline around the one on the left, it even looks like a middle finger sticking up at you 🖕

Same

As Phi already shared, that was not what I did. I’m quite capable of referencing a dictionary or Google myself. I DID comment on the lack of credibility of one of the websites you provided when asked to support your claim that it was “TRUTH!!” that the US capitalistic system WILL soon collapse. When I made this comment, you then suggested I’m clearly over reactive and emotional about the word Marxism. It’s fairly well apparent that you either have a problem with reading comprehension, intellectual honesty, or perhaps both. Regardless, none of this is either interesting nor on-topic. This thread is about the insurrection on January 6. If you’d like to further explore the likelihood (or what you claim is an inevitability) of the capitalistic parts of the US economic system collapsing, then please do so in a separate thread. See above

What does this mean?

There’s no there there. We see shiny stuff on Mars all of the time. This is nothing new and has happened with past photos. Sometimes, it’s just plastic from the rover or landing vehicle itself: https://www.cnet.com/news/curiositys-new-bright-shiny-object-is-actually-martian/ https://www.cnet.com/news/nasa-identifies-mars-rovers-mysterious-bright-object/ Other times, it’s a cosmic ray being detected by the camera equipment: https://www.cnet.com/news/mysterious-light-in-mars-image-sparks-curiosity/ But in most cases, it’s just our feeble human brains forcing us to see patterns even when they’re not actually there, like this woman on Mars (and like is almost certainly happening here in this silly thread): Pareidolia strikes again!

Technically, it depends on the nature of sound emitted by the drill and the object(s) within the room under question, but in the VAST vast majority of situations your answer of NO is certainly correct. ‘I’m increasingly convinced we’re chatting with a bot, though.

That you must better define your terms before meaningful discussion may occur. 1. Honest 2. Dignified 3. Expectation 4. Respect

You misspelled relevance

They’re also refusing to buy potatohead dolls since they’re actively loving to be more inclusive of transgendered kids Yes, those are all interesting opinion pieces highlighting some of the weaknesses in our current economic system. They are not “truth” claims about an inevitable crash as you seem to think. I assure you I’m primed, painted, and even fairly well weathered on these subjects, but appreciate your attempts to enlighten me like some naive uninformed child. I find the marxists dot org site to be especially credible in that endeavor

Amazing how much this thread feels like one on a conspiracy site.

Have you ever heard of Google? It’s a useful tool and you can ask it great questions like “how does noise induced hearing loss work?”

Why not just toss in a desiccant packet or two?

That’s gibberish and fails to answer my actual question. Would you like to try again, or just stop now while you’re... let’s call it... ahead?

Ok. It's a bit like suggesting that doctors mostly only hand out bandaids, but won't belabor it any further. I can feel the returns on this exchange already diminishing.

In what way are you suggesting your claims of "the upcoming total collapse of the entire capitalistic system in the USA" is "truth?"

I tend to agree, but your original assertion suggested the opposing side of atheism is deism. That's a rather odd claim to make when in the US, for example, deism accounts for only about 0.02% of the population whereas theism accounts for almost 80%... you know, about 4,000x as many as deists do.

It doesn't feel like your post has enough hyperbole or exaggeration. Would it be possible for you to please add a bit more next time?

And I'm supposed to just take your word on that? Please elaborate. Happy to discuss and correct any blindspots or errors in my thinking.

It's actually called an, "Oops... That's never happened to me before, I swear!"