iNow

Lol. All 3 of them. #priorities

No

More likely to me is it was another grift to secure LARGE sums of money in exchange for info, most likely from the Saudis (who have also already given more than $2 Billion to Jared Kushner for extremely questionable reasons) and potentially even Russia. The DoJ tried less severe means first, including a subpoena this spring that Trump and team ignored. Their lack of compliance is a direct reason for the escalation.

Fascist tendencies

Unsure why you don’t feel that’s very specifically an economics and politics problem. I’m not saying we can avoid unpredictable disasters, more that we can stop making the problems worse amd update building codes to support same purpose / fortify against other coming storms (much like California building codes now have requirements to protect homes against wildfires. I’d focus more on desalination, storage, amd transportation of sea water as Israel has been doing for decades. The politics and unwillingness to invest, however, seem to be preventing this.

As studiot pointed out in the OP, this isn’t an engineering or technical problem. Like with climate change, we know exactly what needs to be done to address it, but politics and economics stand in the way.

Almond trees, even But then this post would need to move to a different subforum: https://www.scienceforums.net/forum/110-sculptures-made-of-almonds/

Like a broken analog clock, I acknowledge that you might every once in awhile be correct, but sadly it will almost certainly be by accident.

Inhaling the byproducts of any combustion (burning) is toxic and/or carcinogenic, so the question really is how much, how does it differ based on the substance being burned, and how do those things map to your personal level of risk tolerance. Keep in mind it’s not just the oil,in your pan, but the heating being applied below it that matter here.

Your mention of A and B and mine of one vs greater than one makes the answer here to the quoted question obvious… With binary! I’m in town all week, folks. Try the schnitzel.

Today while Biden’s passing historic legislation on climate and healthcare, Trump’s passing FBI agents carrying boxes outside his shiny toilet. ———- "It's a sad day in America when a man whose only crime was breaking the law is treated as if he were some kind of criminal." - Paul Campos

Given assertions like this, I trust you’re a massive supporter of Joe Biden and the current congress given that the US economy is right now functionally at full employment. A near century low of unemployment. Let me guess, though… you don’t. 😂 I think this may just be even more hilarious the second time. Have you considered doing standup? This is great material! It also completely fails to account for the actual ROI on the investment and the additional costs poverty imposed on others. It’s like a kindergartners version of economics. He may as well be saying scooby do is needed to prevent crime.

The farts of purple unicorns cause erections in leprechauns. See, I can make up anything I want, too!

As the obvious “law and order” party, they clearly only care when they can enforce the law via foreign adversaries hacking email systems. It’s a bit like how so many of them shout about the 2nd amendment being sacred but try to prevent BLM supporters from open carrying.

Division, but more in a conceptual sense than an operational one. Specifically, there must be more than one concept or object or entity to compare and transact to perform maths. You can do little with just ONE object/entity/concept/etc., but the moment you have two (aka more than one), mathematical operation only then becomes possible. Ergo, in order to carry out any sort of mathematics, I suggest that the operation of division is prerequisite.

And within a few short weeks I’m sure at least one kind entrepreneurial soul will join our fine community here to share a link to great one!

The simpler point is there’s a reason we needed equal rights amendments and civil rights acts and laws allowing white and black peoples or same sex couples to wed. Just saying we’re all equal doesn’t mean those currently in power ensure that’s so.

A great reshuffling is happening. What that ultimately means will be for historians to decide.

The history here seems relevant. Certain classes of people are considered “protected,” not privileged, and there’s good reason this had to be. For decades / centuries they were discriminated against merely for how they were born. It’s as if someone goes to the doctor for a broken arm and the doctor says, “All bones matter!” Well… yeah. Thx, Dr Einstein. Nobody disagrees with that lovely bumper sticker fitting platitude, but maybe we could focus right now on this broken one since that’s why I’m here? We agree all people deserve to be treated well and respectfully, but since so many of our fellow citizens can’t seem to get on board with that simple agreement, we need to take extra steps and actively ensure the protection is afforded. As noted earlier, some white men are mostly noticing the loss off their asymmetric privilege RELATIVE to the privilege thankfully now being experienced by their non-white non-male peers. That doesn’t however, mean that white men are actually losing any rights or facing any discrimination. They’re just enjoying less unearned benefit than before and relative to peers and noticing the difference. Many are mad that they can’t keep a job if they fail to perform or are angry that society now calls them out for saying nigger and faggot and retard and related epithets. Well boo fucking hoo, snowflake. Grow a pair and quit whining. (not directed at you, just commenting on society more broadly).

The US is sending now another BILLION dollars in military aid to Ukraine, bringing the total to $9B. Meanwhile, China continued exercises off Taiwanese waters and there’s more movement there than has been for decades.

I didn’t say it’s not a factor, but if 90% or more of the population is successfully breeding despite having the trait, then the evolutionary pressures asserted by that trait are minimal to nonexistent. Evolution selects only for the things which prevent breeding. Some people have extremely severe allergies, but they can still for the most part fornicate and sire offspring… and it’s FAR fewer than 1 in 10 who cannot… more like 1 in a few hundred thousand.

Oh, the sweet delicious irony.

Friendly hint: You just spent a few hours typing 4 or 5 long ranty posts where you essentially dig in your heels, move goalposts, and offer straw men and red herrings. That same time could’ve instead been used to post even one single example of the evidence you say is plentiful. Nobody has stopped you but yourself. Gosh. I wonder why that is.

Because not every disorder prevents you from successfully having offspring.