iNow

Nobody types like that.

There’d be no good detection mechanism, few good ways to enforce such a ban, and this becomes doubly true when the forum “member” doing the posting isn’t even human but is instead itself an AI bot.

Understandable when viewed through the lens of the aerospace sector. That slice of collaboration may not be representative of the broader whole, though.

FYI https://www.scienceforums.net/guidelines/ https://www.scienceforums.net/staff/

You need to refresh your definition of logic.

And the dataset in support of that hypothesis continues expanding

Recommend beginning with your currently flawed comprehension of it

And you’re obviously ignorant of optical illusions

Negative, little buddy. I’m not the one making the claim. The onus of proof is yours.

Once you disregard the laws of physics, you can suggest any possible answer. My Time Machine will be powered by raccoons from outer space, but just the ones that eat tiramisu for breakfast every day and pistachios for dinner.

Yawn

Science for millennia has directly challenged the church’s claims to absolute truth. These particular subjects were more of an affront to core scriptures and teachings than most others. They don’t care how computers and GPS work, but get nervous when others start telling them about how life is the way it is or how the observable universe seems to have begun. That’s “their” territory. … at least that’s what they tell people when selling their wares.

In fact, it's chronologically impossible

Yeah, I forgot that all your threads are ridiculous time wasters. Appreciate the reminder.

no

More than most, but enough to know that an ethos is insufficient to overcome basic physics, with which I’m also somewhat familiar. I’ve got a bridge I want to sell you. That was Star Wars, not Shaolin. Correct, the nonexistent one.

I’m familiar with Shaolin training. I can assure you none are able to levitate

And I’ve seen YouTube videos of unicorns pooping out rainbows. Good for you.

It’s Shaolin, and none of them are levitating (despite their incredible training and gymnastic abilities)

CO2 isn’t the only thing ejected by erupting volcanoes. Ash and dust matter here, too. https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/how-climate-works/how-volcanoes-influence-climate

shade

Oh, thank goodness you clarified that

A link I shared earlier in the thread also dove into this: https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/is-consciousness-everywhere/

Modern research suggests the most likely phenomenon is unconscious processing occurs and we only then later “apply” a narrative on top of that to explain it once it enters our conscious awareness. More remains to be learned, but the most supportable concepts imply that the paraventricular thalamus, claustrum, and the posterior cortex (the occipital and temporal lobe) are core to this integration activity. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2019.00302/full#h2 You may well be correct. The core idea has merit, though. Despite being activated chemically, the nervous system is a global collection of local individual EM events (each with their own polarization and thresholds) all combined by a sort of biological forrier analysis. I compare it to multiple streams and rivers flowing into a single data lake. The shape of that lake is forever changing since so too are the aforementioned flowing inputs from the streams.